Skip to content
Asian Resources Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Asian Resources Inc

Employment and training services

$348k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$41k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Employment$1.8MHealth$10k
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 17 grants below total $321,129, the rows itemized in this filing. The $348,004 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $26,875 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$14,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$8.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OCAPICA$41,084
PACIFIC ISLANDER HEALTH PARTNERSHIP$34,834
HEALTHY HOUSE WITHIN A MATCH COALITION$31,084
NICOS CHINESE HEALTH COALITION$31,084
KOREAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF THE EAST BAY$23,334
THE FRESNO CENTER$23,334
FAMILIES IN GOOD HEALTH$18,875
SOUTH ASIAN NETWORK$18,875
OCA SACRAMENTO$14,000
INDIAN ASSOCIATION OF SACRAMENTO$12,500
THAI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER$11,125
ACC SENIOR SERVICES$11,000
ASIAN PACIFIC ISLANDER FORWARD MOVEMENT$10,000
AFRICA HOUSE OF SACRAMENTO$10,000
TOFA INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $619k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE FRESNO CENTER: $38k → 19%HEALTHY HOUSE WITHIN A MATCH COALITION: $48k → 19%THE FRESNO CENTER: $35k → 19%HEALTHY HOUSE WITHIN A MATCH COALITION: $39k → 19%THE FRESNO CENTER: $23k → 19%HEALTHY HOUSE WITHIN A MATCH COALITION: $31k → 19%ASIAN YOUTH CENTER: $5k → 14%THE FRESNO CENTER: $13k → 19%HEALTHY HOUSE WITHIN A MATCH COALITION: $20k → 19%SOUTH ASIAN NETWORK: $25k → 14%COMMUNITY LINK CAPITAL REGION: $16k → 12%SOUTH ASIAN NETWORK: $19k → 14%COMMUNITY LINK CAPITAL REGION: $15k → 12%SOUTH ASIAN NETWORK: $15k → 14%SOUTH ASIAN NETWORK: $13k → 14%ASIAN PACIFIC ISLANDER FORWARD MOVEMENT: $14k → 14%ASIAN PACIFIC ISLANDER FORWARD MOVEMENT: $11k → 14%ASIAN PACIFIC ISLANDER FORWARD MOVEMENT: $10k → 14%MUTUAL ASSISTANCE NETWORK: $17k → 12%ASIAN PACIFIC AIDS INTERVENTION TEAM: $5k → 14%MUTUAL ASSISTANCE NETWORK: $15k → 12%PALS FOR HEALTH: $13k → 14%PALS FOR HEALTH: $10k → 14%PALS FOR HEALTH: $10k → 14%THAI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $14k → 14%THAI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $12k → 14%THAI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $11k → 14%THAI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $5k → 14%LA FAMILIA COUNSELING CENTER INC: $15k → 12%VIETNAMESE AMERICAN COMMUNITY OF SACTO: $28k → 12%VIETNAMESE AMERICAN COMMUNITY OF SACTO: $18k → 12%VIETNAMESE AMERICAN COMMUNITY OF SACTO: $10k → 12%VIETNAMESE AMERICAN COMMUNITY OF SACTO: $10k → 12%VIETNAMESE AMERICAN COMMUNITY OF SACTO: $8k → 12%HMONG YOUTH AND PARENTS UNITED: $15k → 12%HMONG YOUTH AND PARENTS UNITED: $8k → 12%HMONG YOUTH AND PARENTS UNITED: $8k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 26 repeat orgs$149k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
11

Total granted

$2.0M
$149k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+28%

Still filing today

96%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureInternationalCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ORANGE COUNTY ASIAN AND PACIFIC ISLANDER
    4× · 2022–2025 · $171k · revenue +59%
  • HH
    HEALTHY HOUSE WITHIN A MATCH COALITION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $138k · revenue +69%
  • KOREAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF THE EAST BAY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $127k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • MN
    MARSHALLESE NEW BEGINING
    one grant, 2023 · $28k
  • ASIAN PACIFIC HEALTH CARE VENTURE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $23k · revenue +28%
  • CHINATOWN SERVICE CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +62%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Asian American Advocacy Alliance
Community Improvement
2
Asian American Center of Santa Clara

The mission of Asian American Community Center of Santa Clara County (AASC) is to provide health, human, and economic development services to low income families and individuals to enable them to become actively participating citizens in…

Human Services
3
Asian Law Caucus

The Asian Law Caucus's mission is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist…

Crime & Legal
4
Asian Pacific Center for Human Development

To advance the well being of the asian american pacific islander community by providing culturally appropriate and integrated medical, behavioral, and related services.

Health
5
The Asian-American Senior Citizen Association
Human Services
6
Asian American Senior Citizens Service Center Inc

To provide educational, medical, and employment services to the seniors of asian communities.

—
7
Asian Community Center Inc
Public Benefit
8
Asian Pacific Islander Capitol Assn

The Asian Pacific Islander Capitol Association (APICA) is a non-partisan, 501(c)(3) non-profit organization comprised of legislative staffers, advocates, and other API professionals based in the State Capitol community of Sacramento,…

Community Improvement
9
Asian-American National Committee Inc

Various national educational programs and services.

Arts & Culture
10
Asian American Resource Center Inc

To improve the health and well-being of Asians and Asian Americans in Central Texas through education advocacy and support. A new contracted outreach program with Central Health began to conduct community outreach for the Medical Access…

Recreation & Sports
11
San Francisco Filipino Cultural Center
Arts & Culture
12
Asian and Pacific Islander Americans in Historic Preservation

APIAHIP is the only national organization dedicated to protecting historic places and cultural resources significant to Asian and Pacific Islander Americans.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Asian American Drug Abuse Program Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pacific Islander Health Partnership. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
22/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HEALTHY HOUSE WITHIN A MATCH COALITION: $138,000 · Human ServicesHEALTHY HOUSE WITHIN A MATCH COAL…THE FRESNO CENTER: $108,500 · Human ServicesTHE FRESNO CENTERVIETNAMESE AMERICAN COMMUNITY OF SA: $73,000 · Human ServicesVIETNAMESE AMERICAN COMMUNITY OF …Special Service for Groups Inc: $72,250 · Human ServicesSpecial Service for Groups IncSOUTH ASIAN NETWORK INC: $71,375 · Human ServicesSOUTH ASIAN NETWORK INCTHAI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $41,875 · Human ServicesTHAI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERMUTUAL ASSISTANCE NETWORK OF DEL PASO HEIGHTS: $32,000 · Human ServicesCommunity Link Capital Region: $31,000 · Human ServicesHMONG YOUTH AND PARENTS UNITED: $30,500 · Human Services+2 more: $20,250 · Human ServicesORANGE COUNTY ASIAN AND PACIFIC ISLANDER: $170,500 · HealthORANGE COUNTY ASIAN AND PACIFIC I…NICOS CHINESE HEALTH COALITION: $137,703 · HealthNICOS CHINESE HEALTH COALITIONPACIFIC ISLANDER HEALTH PARTNERSHIP: $107,500 · HealthPACIFIC ISLANDER HEALTH PARTNERSH…DIGNITY HEALTH: $71,375 · HealthDIGNITY HEALTHASIAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF SACRAMENTO VALLEY INC DBA ACC SENIOR SERVICES: $66,000 · HealthASIAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF SACRAME…OPERATION SAMAHAN INC: $44,250 · HealthOPERATION SAMAHAN INC+1 more: $17,500 · HealthKOREAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF THE EAST BAY: $126,500 · OtherKOREAN COMMUNITY CENTER …ORGANIZATION OF CHINESE AMERICANS INC: $124,500 · OtherORGANIZATION OF CHINESE …SACRAMENTO IU-MIEN ASSOCIATION INC: $42,500 · OtherSACRAMENTO IU-MIEN ASSOC…MARSHALLESE NEW BEGINING: $27,500 · OtherMARSHALLESE NEW BEGININGSACRAMENTO CHINESE OF INDOCHINA FRIENDSHIP ASSOCIATION IN AMERICA: $25,500 · OtherSACRAMENTO CHINESE OF IN…ASIAN PACIFIC HEALTH CARE VENTURE INC: $22,500 · OtherCHINATOWN SERVICE CENTER: $15,000 · OtherMy Sisters House: $25,500 · OtherMy Sisters House+4 more: $38,750 · Other+4 moreINDIAN ASSOCIATION OF SACRAMENTO: $88,000 · Arts & CultureTOFA of Sacramento Incorporated: $67,500 · Arts & CultureCAPITAL OF SACRAMENTO INC: $115,000 · Community ImprovementJAPANESE AMERICAN CITIZENS LEAGUE: $10,000 · Community ImprovementTHE FILIPINO COMMUNITY OF SACRAMENTO AND VICINITY: $73,000 · PhilanthropyAFRICA HOUSE SACRAMENTO INC: $50,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC: $15,000 · International
Human Services$618,750Health$614,828Other$448,250Arts & Culture$155,500Community Improvement$125,000Philanthropy$73,000International$65,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetORANGE COUNTY ASIAN AND PACIFIC ISLANDER: $170,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHEALTHY HOUSE WITHIN A MATCH COALITION: $138,000 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetNICOS CHINESE HEALTH COALITION: $137,703 over 4y, 4.8% of budgetKOREAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF THE EAST BAY: $126,500 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetORGANIZATION OF CHINESE AMERICANS INC: $124,500 over 5y, 62% of budgetCAPITAL OF SACRAMENTO INC: $115,000 over 4y, 100% of budgetTHE FRESNO CENTER: $108,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPACIFIC ISLANDER HEALTH PARTNERSHIP: $107,500 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetINDIAN ASSOCIATION OF SACRAMENTO: $88,000 over 5y, 81% of budgetVIETNAMESE AMERICAN COMMUNITY OF SA: $73,000 over 5y, 88% of budgetTHE FILIPINO COMMUNITY OF SACRAMENTO AND VICINITY: $73,000 over 3y, 32% of budgetSpecial Service for Groups Inc: $72,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH ASIAN NETWORK INC: $71,375 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetDIGNITY HEALTH: $71,375 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTOFA of Sacramento Incorporated: $67,500 over 4y, 7.7% of budgetASIAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF SACRAMENTO VALLEY INC DBA ACC SENIOR SERVICES: $66,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAFRICA HOUSE SACRAMENTO INC: $50,000 over 3y, 41% of budgetOPERATION SAMAHAN INC: $44,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHAI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $41,875 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetMUTUAL ASSISTANCE NETWORK OF DEL PASO HEIGHTS: $32,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCommunity Link Capital Region: $31,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetHMONG YOUTH AND PARENTS UNITED: $30,500 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetMy Sisters House: $25,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSACRAMENTO CHINESE OF INDOCHINA FRIENDSHIP ASSOCIATION IN AMERICA: $25,500 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetASIAN PACIFIC HEALTH CARE VENTURE INC: $22,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASIAN PACIFIC COMMUNITY COUNSELING: $17,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCHINATOWN SERVICE CENTER: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLa Familia Counseling Center Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAsian Pacific Islander American Public Affairs - Community Education Foundation: $12,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetKOREAN AMERICAN COALITION: $11,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetASIAN AMERICAN DRUG ABUSE PROGRAM INC: $5,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASIAN YOUTH CENTER: $5,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Asian Americans Advan…The California Endowm…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Asian Pacific Communi…Public Health Institu…Sierra Health Foundat…GofundmeorgThe California Wellne…Sierra Health Foundat…Weingart FoundationCommunity PartnersUnited Way California…
Asian Americans Advancing Justice Southern CaliforniaCA34.7× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Asian Americans Advancing Justice Southern California · The California Endowment · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Asian Pacific Community Fund of Southern California · Public Health Institute · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · Gofundmeorg · The California Wellness Foundation · Sierra Health Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Community Partners · United Way California Capital Region

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Asian Resources Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Asian Resources Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Asian Resources’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home