Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Asian Resources Inc

Employment and training services

$348k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$41k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.

Employment$1.8MHealth$10k
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 17 grants below total $321,129 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $348,004 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $26,875 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$14,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$8.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OCAPICA$41,084
PACIFIC ISLANDER HEALTH PARTNERSHIP$34,834
HEALTHY HOUSE WITHIN A MATCH COALITION$31,084
NICOS CHINESE HEALTH COALITION$31,084
KOREAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF THE EAST BAY$23,334
THE FRESNO CENTER$23,334
SOUTH ASIAN NETWORK$18,875
FAMILIES IN GOOD HEALTH$18,875
OCA SACRAMENTO$14,000
INDIAN ASSOCIATION OF SACRAMENTO$12,500
THAI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER$11,125
ACC SENIOR SERVICES$11,000
TOFA INC$10,000
PALS FOR HEALTH$10,000
VIETNAMESE AMERICAN COMMUNITY OF SACTO$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $619k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE FRESNO CENTER: $38k → 19%HEALTHY HOUSE WITHIN A MATCH COALITION: $48k → 19%THE FRESNO CENTER: $35k → 19%HEALTHY HOUSE WITHIN A MATCH COALITION: $39k → 19%THE FRESNO CENTER: $23k → 19%HEALTHY HOUSE WITHIN A MATCH COALITION: $31k → 19%ASIAN YOUTH CENTER: $5k → 14%THE FRESNO CENTER: $13k → 19%HEALTHY HOUSE WITHIN A MATCH COALITION: $20k → 19%SOUTH ASIAN NETWORK: $25k → 14%COMMUNITY LINK CAPITAL REGION: $16k → 12%SOUTH ASIAN NETWORK: $19k → 14%COMMUNITY LINK CAPITAL REGION: $15k → 12%SOUTH ASIAN NETWORK: $15k → 14%SOUTH ASIAN NETWORK: $13k → 14%ASIAN PACIFIC ISLANDER FORWARD MOVEMENT: $14k → 14%ASIAN PACIFIC ISLANDER FORWARD MOVEMENT: $11k → 14%ASIAN PACIFIC ISLANDER FORWARD MOVEMENT: $10k → 14%MUTUAL ASSISTANCE NETWORK: $17k → 12%ASIAN PACIFIC AIDS INTERVENTION TEAM: $5k → 14%MUTUAL ASSISTANCE NETWORK: $15k → 12%PALS FOR HEALTH: $13k → 14%PALS FOR HEALTH: $10k → 14%PALS FOR HEALTH: $10k → 14%THAI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $14k → 14%THAI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $12k → 14%THAI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $11k → 14%THAI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $5k → 14%LA FAMILIA COUNSELING CENTER INC: $15k → 12%VIETNAMESE AMERICAN COMMUNITY OF SACTO: $28k → 12%VIETNAMESE AMERICAN COMMUNITY OF SACTO: $18k → 12%VIETNAMESE AMERICAN COMMUNITY OF SACTO: $10k → 12%VIETNAMESE AMERICAN COMMUNITY OF SACTO: $10k → 12%VIETNAMESE AMERICAN COMMUNITY OF SACTO: $8k → 12%HMONG YOUTH AND PARENTS UNITED: $15k → 12%HMONG YOUTH AND PARENTS UNITED: $8k → 12%HMONG YOUTH AND PARENTS UNITED: $8k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.0M · 26 repeat orgs$149k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
11

Total granted

$2.0M
$149k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+38%

Still filing today

96%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureInternationalCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ORANGE COUNTY ASIAN AND PACIFIC ISLANDER
    4× · 2022–2025 · $171k · revenue +59%
  • HH
    HEALTHY HOUSE WITHIN A MATCH COALITION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $138k · revenue +14%
  • KOREAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF THE EAST BAY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $127k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • MN
    MARSHALLESE NEW BEGINING
    one grant, 2023 · $28k
  • ASIAN PACIFIC HEALTH CARE VENTURE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $23k · revenue +28%
  • CHINATOWN SERVICE CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +62%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Asian American Advocacy Alliance
Community Improvement
2
Asian American Center of Santa Clara

The mission of Asian American Community Center of Santa Clara County (AASC) is to provide health, human, and economic development services to low income families and individuals to enable them to become actively participating citizens in…

Human Services
3
Asian Law Caucus

The Asian Law Caucus's mission is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist…

Crime & Legal
4
The Asian-American Senior Citizen Association
Human Services
5
Asian Pacific Center for Human Development

To advance the well being of the asian american pacific islander community by providing culturally appropriate and integrated medical, behavioral, and related services.

Health
6
Asian American Senior Citizens Service Center Inc

To provide educational, medical, and employment services to the seniors of asian communities.

—
7
Asian Community Center Inc
Public Benefit
8
Asian Pacific Islander Capitol Assn

The Asian Pacific Islander Capitol Association (APICA) is a non-partisan, 501(c)(3) non-profit organization comprised of legislative staffers, advocates, and other API professionals based in the State Capitol community of Sacramento,…

Community Improvement
9
San Francisco Filipino Cultural Center
Arts & Culture
10
Asian American Resource Center Inc

To improve the health and well-being of Asians and Asian Americans in Central Texas through education advocacy and support. A new contracted outreach program with Central Health began to conduct community outreach for the Medical Access…

Recreation & Sports
11
Asian-American National Committee Inc

Various national educational programs and services.

Arts & Culture
12
Asians for Collective Action

Asians for Collective Action (ACA) harnesses the strenghts of Asians and Asian Americans to drive systemic change to create a just, healthy, and thriving community for all.

Public Benefit

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Asian American Drug Abuse Program Inc and the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%0%<5yr16%14%5–10yr20%16%10–20yr17%24%20–35yr10%35%35–55yr12%11%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%0%<5yr16%14%5–10yr20%16%10–20yr17%35%20–35yr10%28%35–55yr12%6%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/37
the rest of the field
15%
11,146/73,994

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
22/33
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HEALTHY HOUSE WITHIN A MATCH COALITION — $138,000 · Human ServicesHEALTHY HOUSE WITHIN A MATCH COAL…THE FRESNO CENTER — $108,500 · Human ServicesTHE FRESNO CENTERVIETNAMESE AMERICAN COMMUNITY OF SA — $73,000 · Human ServicesVIETNAMESE AMERICAN COMMUNITY OF …Special Service for Groups Inc — $72,250 · Human ServicesSpecial Service for Groups IncSOUTH ASIAN NETWORK INC — $71,375 · Human ServicesSOUTH ASIAN NETWORK INCTHAI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $41,875 · Human ServicesTHAI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERMUTUAL ASSISTANCE NETWORK OF DEL PASO HEIGHTS — $32,000 · Human ServicesCommunity Link Capital Region — $31,000 · Human ServicesHMONG YOUTH AND PARENTS UNITED — $30,500 · Human Services+2 more — $20,250 · Human ServicesORANGE COUNTY ASIAN AND PACIFIC ISLANDER — $170,500 · HealthORANGE COUNTY ASIAN AND PACIFIC I…NICOS CHINESE HEALTH COALITION — $137,703 · HealthNICOS CHINESE HEALTH COALITIONPACIFIC ISLANDER HEALTH PARTNERSHIP — $107,500 · HealthPACIFIC ISLANDER HEALTH PARTNERSH…DIGNITY HEALTH — $71,375 · HealthDIGNITY HEALTHASIAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF SACRAMENTO VALLEY INC DBA ACC SENIOR SERVICES — $66,000 · HealthASIAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF SACRAME…OPERATION SAMAHAN INC — $44,250 · HealthOPERATION SAMAHAN INC+1 more — $17,500 · HealthKOREAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF THE EAST BAY — $126,500 · OtherKOREAN COMMUNITY CENTER …ORGANIZATION OF CHINESE AMERICANS INC — $124,500 · OtherORGANIZATION OF CHINESE …SACRAMENTO IU-MIEN ASSOCIATION INC — $42,500 · OtherSACRAMENTO IU-MIEN ASSOC…MARSHALLESE NEW BEGINING — $27,500 · OtherMARSHALLESE NEW BEGININGSACRAMENTO CHINESE OF INDOCHINA FRIENDSHIP ASSOCIATION IN AMERICA — $25,500 · OtherSACRAMENTO CHINESE OF IN…ASIAN PACIFIC HEALTH CARE VENTURE INC — $22,500 · OtherMy Sisters House — $25,500 · OtherMy Sisters House+6 more — $63,750 · Other+6 moreINDIAN ASSOCIATION OF SACRAMENTO — $88,000 · Arts & CultureTOFA of Sacramento Incorporated — $67,500 · Arts & CultureCAPITAL OF SACRAMENTO INC — $115,000 · Community ImprovementTHE FILIPINO COMMUNITY OF SACRAMENTO AND VICINITY — $73,000 · PhilanthropyAFRICA HOUSE SACRAMENTO INC — $50,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC — $15,000 · International
Human Services$618,750Health$614,828Other$458,250Arts & Culture$155,500Community Improvement$115,000Philanthropy$73,000International$65,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetORANGE COUNTY ASIAN AND PACIFIC ISLANDER — $170,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHEALTHY HOUSE WITHIN A MATCH COALITION — $138,000 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetNICOS CHINESE HEALTH COALITION — $137,703 over 4y, 4.8% of budgetKOREAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF THE EAST BAY — $126,500 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetORGANIZATION OF CHINESE AMERICANS INC — $124,500 over 5y, 62% of budgetCAPITAL OF SACRAMENTO INC — $115,000 over 4y, 100% of budgetTHE FRESNO CENTER — $108,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPACIFIC ISLANDER HEALTH PARTNERSHIP — $107,500 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetINDIAN ASSOCIATION OF SACRAMENTO — $88,000 over 5y, 81% of budgetTHE FILIPINO COMMUNITY OF SACRAMENTO AND VICINITY — $73,000 over 3y, 32% of budgetVIETNAMESE AMERICAN COMMUNITY OF SA — $73,000 over 5y, 88% of budgetSpecial Service for Groups Inc — $72,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDIGNITY HEALTH — $71,375 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH ASIAN NETWORK INC — $71,375 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetTOFA of Sacramento Incorporated — $67,500 over 4y, 7.7% of budgetASIAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF SACRAMENTO VALLEY INC DBA ACC SENIOR SERVICES — $66,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAFRICA HOUSE SACRAMENTO INC — $50,000 over 3y, 41% of budgetOPERATION SAMAHAN INC — $44,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHAI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $41,875 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetMUTUAL ASSISTANCE NETWORK OF DEL PASO HEIGHTS — $32,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCommunity Link Capital Region — $31,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetHMONG YOUTH AND PARENTS UNITED — $30,500 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetMy Sisters House — $25,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSACRAMENTO CHINESE OF INDOCHINA FRIENDSHIP ASSOCIATION IN AMERICA — $25,500 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetASIAN PACIFIC HEALTH CARE VENTURE INC — $22,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASIAN PACIFIC COMMUNITY COUNSELING — $17,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCHINATOWN SERVICE CENTER — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLa Familia Counseling Center Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAsian Pacific Islander American Public Affairs - Community Education Foundation — $12,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetKOREAN AMERICAN COALITION — $11,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetASIAN AMERICAN DRUG ABUSE PROGRAM INC — $5,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASIAN YOUTH CENTER — $5,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Asian Americans Advan…The California Endowm…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Asian Pacific Communi…Public Health Institu…Sierra Health Foundat…GofundmeorgThe California Wellne…Sierra Health Foundat…Weingart FoundationCommunity PartnersUnited Way California…
Asian Americans Advancing Justice Southern CaliforniaCA34.7× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Asian Americans Advancing Justice Southern California · The California Endowment · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Asian Pacific Community Fund of Southern California · Public Health Institute · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · Gofundmeorg · The California Wellness Foundation · Sierra Health Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Community Partners · United Way California Capital Region

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Asian Resources Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home