Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ashbrook Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$120k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Environment$70kEducation$62kHousing & Shelter$32kHuman Services$30kPhilanthropy$22kCivil Rights$22kCrime & Legal$20kYouth Development$10k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$231k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RAINFOREST TRUST$20,000
CLEAN AIR COUNCIL$20,000
PUBLIC INTEREST LAW CENTER$20,000
YORK READY FOR CLIMATE ACTION$20,000
AVESTA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP$10,000
BROAD STREET MINISTRY$10,000
ALLENTOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION$10,000
EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA COALITION FOR ABANDONED MINE RECLAMATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%YORK READY FOR CLIMATE ACTION: $20k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

42%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$105k · 3 repeat orgs$142k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
3

Total granted

$105k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-18%
-7%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $90k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Human ServicesEnvironmentEducationHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AS
    Allentown School District Foundation
    3× · 2022–2024 · $42k · revenue -18%
  • AH
    AVESTA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $32k · revenue -3%
  • BROAD STREET MINISTRY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $30k · revenue -50%

Funded once

  • NL
    NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $22k · revenue -30%
  • CE
    CHESTER EDUCATION FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +111%
  • THE ATTIC YOUTH CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pennsylvania Solar Center

We provide trusted guidance to usher all pennsylvanians into the clean energy economy to reach a sustainable and resilient tomorrow.

Environment
2
Conservation Law Foundation Inc

Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…

Environment
3
Fresh Energy

Shape and drive bold policy solutions to achieve equitable carbon-neutral economies.

Environment
4
The Ohio Environmental Council

To protect the environment and health of all ohio communities through legal and policy advocacy, decision-maker accountability, and civic engagement.

Environment
5
Women's Law Project

Women's law project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. to this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education. the core values of women's law…

Civil Rights
6
Natural Resources Defense Council Inc

We safeguard the earth: its people, its plants and animals, and (see schedule o) the natural systems on which all life depends. we work to restore the integrity of the elements that sustain life - air, land, and water - to defend…

Environment
7
Delaware and Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Inc

See schedule oper the bylaws of the delaware & lehigh national heritage corridor(which were updated by the merged board of the national canal musuem and the d&l), our mission is to work with government entities, non-profit organizations…

Arts & Culture
8
The Urban Land Institute

Shape the future of the built environment for transformative impact in communities worldwide. we are a global network of professionals in every sector of real estate development and land use, from private enterprise to public service.

Environment
9
Public Health Law Center Inc

Help community leaders use the power of law and policy to improve america's health.

Education
10
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
11
Urban Affairs Coalition

Driving change from the ground up, the urban affairs coalition (uac) unites government, business, neighborhoods, and individual initiatives to improve the quality of life in the region, build wealth in urban communities, and solve emerging…

—
12
Third Way

To research and develop centrist policy ideas.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Clean Air Council; the most unlike its peers is York Ready for Climate Action. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
4/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BROAD STREET MINISTRY: $30,000 · Human ServicesBROAD STREET MINISTRYYORK READY FOR CLIMATE ACTION: $20,000 · Human ServicesYORK READY FOR CLIMAT…Allentown School District Foundation: $42,250 · EducationAllentown School …NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD FOUNDATION INC: $22,250 · OtherNATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD FOUNDAT…CHESTER EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherCHESTER EDUCATION FOUNDATIONRAINFOREST TRUST: $20,000 · OtherRAINFOREST TRUSTTHE ATTIC YOUTH CENTER: $10,000 · OtherTHE ATTIC YOUTH CENTERAVESTA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $32,250 · Housing & ShelterAVESTA HOUSIN…Clean Air Council: $20,000 · EnvironmentClean Air Co…EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA COALITION FOR ABANDONED MINE RECLAMATION: $10,000 · EnvironmentEASTERN PENN…FOUNDATION FOR DELAWARE COUNTY: $22,250 · HealthFOUNDATIO…THE PUBLIC INTEREST LAW CENTER: $20,000 · Crime & Legal
Human Services$50,000Education$42,250Other$72,250Housing & Shelter$32,250Environment$30,000Health$22,250Crime & Legal$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAllentown School District Foundation: $42,250 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetAVESTA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $32,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBROAD STREET MINISTRY: $30,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD FOUNDATION INC: $22,250 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR DELAWARE COUNTY: $22,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PUBLIC INTEREST LAW CENTER: $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetYORK READY FOR CLIMATE ACTION: $20,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetCHESTER EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetRAINFOREST TRUST: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetClean Air Council: $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA COALITION FOR ABANDONED MINE RECLAMATION: $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetTHE ATTIC YOUTH CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Td Charitable FoundationME15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Td Charitable Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ashbrook Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ashbrook Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ashbrook Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ashbrook Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ashbrook Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph