Skip to content

· Public charity

Asbury Theological Seminary

Asbury Theological Seminary is a community called to prepare theologically educated, sanctified, Spirit-filled men and women to evangelize and to spread scriptural holiness throughout the world through the love of Jesus Christ, in the power of the Holy Spirit and to the glory of God the Father.

$12M
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
15
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Religion$1.3M
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 24 grants below total $455,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $12,421,029 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $11,966,029 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$20,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$375M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
All Saints Anglican Church Naperville$37,500
Catapult$37,500
Awaken City Church$30,000
Alliance Tabernacle Church$30,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
Resilience Church$30,000
Christ Our Life Anglican Church$30,000
Elevate Church$20,000
Delaware County Alliance$20,000
Gray Community Church$20,000
Cornerstone Anglican Church$20,000
Sound Hope Community Church$20,000
Christ the King Anglican$20,000
Way of Life Church of God in Christ Inc$10,000
Accelaration Church$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY24–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 83% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Awaken City Church: $30k → 16%Christ the King Anglican: $20k → 8%Accelaration Church: $10k → 14%Way of Life Church of God in Christ Inc: $10k → 6%Sound Hope Community Church: $20k → 9%Four Winds NYC: $15k → 17%Alliance Tabernacle Church: $30k → 20%Catapult: $38k → 10%Harvest Church of the Nazarene: $10k → 15%Elevate Church: $20k → 17%Sanibel Community Church: $10k → 11%Mission Igniter: $10k → 13%Vestal United Methodist Church: $10k → 12%Cornerstone Anglican Church: $20k → 11%Favor Church: $10k → 9%Gray Community Church: $20k → 12%Resilience Church: $30k → 7%International Students Inc: $10k → 9%Delaware County Alliance: $20k → 5%Eglise Evangelique Amor du Christ de la CMA: $10k → 15%Every Nation Cincinnati Church: $10k → 16%All Saints Anglican Church Naperville: $38k → 7%Foundry Church: $10k → 10%Kingdom Life Fellowship: $10k → 12%Awaken City Church: $20k → 16%Magnolia Avenue UMC: $30k → 12%Resilience Church: $10k → 7%Asbury Foundation for Theological Education: $732k → 12%Magnolia Avenue UMC: $20k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
CA
CO
MO
KY
AR
TN
NC
SC
MS
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

33%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$180k · 4 repeat orgs$370k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
3

Total granted

$180k
$35k

Still filing today

0%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $335k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2024–2025 · $50k
  • AC
    AWAKEN CITY CHURCH
    2× · 2024–2025 · $50k
  • CO
    CHRIST OUR LIFE ANGLICAN CHURCH
    2× · 2024–2025 · $40k

Funded once

  • WC
    WESLEYAN CHURCH CORPORATION
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
  • PF
    PERCEPTION FUNDING INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +231%
  • FC
    Foundry Church
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ASBURY FOUNDATION FOR THEOLOGICAL EDUCATION INC: $732,262 · OtherASBURY FOUNDATION FOR THEOLOGICAL EDUCATION INCIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherAWAKEN CITY CHURCH: $50,000 · Other+22 more: $392,500 · Other+22 moreCATAPULT LABS INC: $37,500 · ReligionPERCEPTION FUNDING INC: $10,000 · ReligionEVERY NATION CINCINNATI CHURCH: $10,000 · Religion
Other$1,224,762Religion$57,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetASBURY FOUNDATION FOR THEOLOGICAL EDUCATION INC: $732,262 over 1y, 5.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ASBURY FOUNDATION FOR THEOLOGICAL EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CATAPULT LABS INC ↗
  • Who funds PERCEPTION FUNDING INC ↗
  • Who funds EVERY NATION CINCINNATI CHURCH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Signatry Charitable TrustSD12.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Signatry Charitable Trust · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Asbury Theological Seminary funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Asbury Theological Seminary. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Asbury Theological Seminary’s filings →

    More from the funding graph