· Public charity
Arts Mid-Hudson Inc
The mission of arts mid-hudson is to provide vision and leadership to support thriving and diverse arts in the mid-hudson valley.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 23 grants below total $384,800 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $485,800 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $101,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $90k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $159k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $136k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ORGANIZATIONS 5000 | $135,945 |
| BARDAVON 1869 OPERA HOUSE INC | $43,900 |
| UPSTATE FILMS LTD | $16,310 |
| KAATSBAAN INTERNATIONAL DANCE CENTE | $15,500 |
| BEACON ARTS | $15,425 |
| MID-HUDSON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM | $13,125 |
| BEATRIX FARRAND GARDEN ASSOCIATION | $11,725 |
| WASSAIC PROJECT INC | $11,350 |
| NORTHERN DUTCHESS SYMPHONY ORCHESTR | $11,185 |
| THE ART EFFECT OF THE HUDSON VALLEY | $10,150 |
| CUNNEEN-HACKETT ARTS CENTER | $10,000 |
| TRANSART & CULTURAL SERVICES INC | $9,960 |
| FIREWORKS FOUNDATION INC | $9,730 |
| UNISON LEARNING CENTER | $8,100 |
| HUDSON VALLEY CURRENT INC | $8,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 24% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +15% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
27 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NDNORTHERN DUTCHESS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA9× · 2017–2025 · $105k · revenue +53%
- CHCUNNEEN HACKETT CULTURAL CENTER INC CUNNEEN-HACKETT ARTS CENTER6× · 2017–2025 · $78k · revenue +67%
- UFUPSTATE FILMS LTD6× · 2020–2025 · $69k · revenue +222%
Funded once
- TTTHE THOMAS POOLE AND CHARLES SCOTT GRIESA CENTER FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $27k · revenue 0%
- GLGREENWOOD LAKE THEATER INCone grant, 2024 · $18k
- TRTHE RED HOOK COMMUNITY CENTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $16k · revenue +25%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Organization s mission is the development and presentation of new art exhibits and programs.
Development and fostering of the arts in putnam county, new york
The Hudson Cultural Alliance is an all-volunteer,nonprofit that is spearheading the vision of an arts center to attract visitors andbusinesses, create opportunities for community engagement, and increase the regions overall quality of…
Sukkahwood Inc. provides arts programs for the Northern Manhattan community with a Jewish theme.
Entertainment
The mission of Rockland Center for the Arts is to inspire, educate, and enrich the community through creating, teaching, and presenting the arts, and to provide opportunities for all people to experience and participate in the cultural…
Promotion of arts and arts organizations in queens, ny
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Art Effect of the Hudson Valley Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Thomas Poole and Charles Scott Griesa Center Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
66 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 66 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BARDAVON 1869 OPERA HOUSE ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN DUTCHESS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds CUNNEEN HACKETT CULTURAL CENTER INC CUNNEEN-HACKETT ARTS CENTER ↗
- Who funds UPSTATE FILMS LTD ↗
- Who funds THE WASSAIC PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds THE ART EFFECT OF THE HUDSON VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds COUNTY PLAYERS INC ↗
- Who funds The Mid-Hudson Heritage Center Inc DBA Fall Kill Creative Works ↗
- Who funds BEACON ARTS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds BEATRIX FARRAND GARDEN ASSOC INC ↗
- Who funds RHINEBECK PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds KINGSTON MIDTOWN ARTS DISTRICT ↗
- Who funds WICKHAM WORKS INC ↗
- Who funds KAATSBAAN INTERNATIONAL DANCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE THOMAS POOLE AND CHARLES SCOTT GRIESA CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MID-HUDSON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM D/B/A MID-HUDSON DISCOVERY MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds GATEWAY TO ENTREPRENEURIAL TOMORROWS INC ↗
- Who funds Jewish Federation of Ulster County Inc ↗
- Who funds GREENWOOD LAKE THEATER INC ↗
- Who funds HOWLAND CHAMBER MUSIC CIRCLE INC ↗
- Who funds COMPASS ARTS CREATIVITY PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds UNISON LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Shandaken Theatrical Society Inc ↗
- Who funds FireWorks Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds TRANSART AND CULTURAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds THE RED HOOK COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds STEVEN MYRON HOLL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Hudson Valley Current Inc ↗
- Who funds THE VAN WYCK COUNCIL ON THE ARTS & CULTURE INC ↗
- Who funds ORANGE COUNTY NY ARTS COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds SAFE HARBORS OF THE HUDSON INC ↗
- Who funds Wallkill River Center for the Arts ↗
- Who funds The Bannermans Castle Trust Inc ↗
- Who funds STARLING PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds ASHOKAN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FULLERTON MANSION CENTER FOR CULTURE AND HISTORY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundations of the Hudson Valley Inc · Ulster Savings Charitable Foundation · Kvistad Foundation · Novo Foundation · The Dyson Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · JM McDonald Foundation Inc · Jane W Nuhn Charitable Trust · Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc · Preservation League of New York State · Bank of Greene County Charitable Foundation · Hudson Valley Foundation for Youth Health
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Arts Mid-Hudson Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.