Skip to content

· Public charity

Arts Etc

We are proud to announce that funds raised from the 2025 Kiawah Art & House Tour will support visual, performing, and literary arts programs for the youth of Johns and Wadmalaw Islands.

$37k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$419kEducation$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$471k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Charleston Symphony Orchestra$30,000
Engaging Creative Minds$6,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Charleston Gaillard Management Corporation: $34k → 12%Chalrleston Gaillard Management Corporation: $30k → 12%Charleston Galliard Center: $21k → 12%Angel Oak Elementary School: $13k → 12%Angel Oak Elementary School: $13k → 12%Palmetto City Ballet: $20k → 12%Palmetto City Ballet: $10k → 12%Palmetto City Ballet: $10k → 12%Charleston Symphony Orchestra: $30k → 12%PURE Theatre: $29k → 12%PURE Theater: $16k → 12%PURE Theatre: $11k → 12%PURE Theatre: $10k → 12%Charleston Jazz: $18k → 12%Charleston Jazz: $16k → 12%Charleston Jazz: $13k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$374k · 8 repeat orgs$66k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
2

Total granted

$374k
$36k

Still filing today

88%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 18% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PT
    Pure Theatre
    3× · 2022–2024 · $66k · revenue +61%
  • CG
    CHARLESTON GAILLARD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $64k · revenue +24%
  • CM
    CHAMBER MUSIC CHARLESTON
    3× · 2022–2024 · $56k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • CG
    Charleston Galliard Center
    one grant, 2022 · $21k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greenville Theatre Arts Center
—
2
Charleston Concert Association

Sponsor Internationally Acclaimed Classical Performances

Arts & Culture
3
Music Carolina

To provide small ensemble chamber music perfs

Arts & Culture
4
American Chamber Ensemble Inc

The American Chamber Ensemble is a consortium of distinguished musicians whose concerts explore the music for piano with strings, woodwinds and/or voice, presenting both great standard repertoire and living American composers.

—
5
Sumter County Fine Arts Council

Cultural enrichment through arts programs

Arts & Culture
6
Vanguard Concerts
—
7
Classical Theatre Company

Classical Theatre Company is dedicated to boldly re-envisioning classical drama on the stage, in the community, and in the classroom through engaging and enlightening plays that bring them new life and relevance while maintaining the…

Arts & Culture
8
Columbia Childrens Theatre

Inspired by the intelligence and emotional wisdom of young people, we create professional theatre for youth and families, foster inclusive community, and nurture meaningful learning through the arts. We provide these experiences through…

Arts & Culture
9
Centre Stage-South Carolina Inc

Centre stage is a non-profit 501(c)(3) performing arts venue and theatre organization that exists to captivate audiences with diverse programming, cultivate local artistry, and inspire community collaboration.

Arts & Culture
10
The Palmetto Opera

To raise awareness of opera and fine arts in sc.

Arts & Culture
11
Chicago Wind Symphony
Arts & Culture
12
Charleston Academy of Music

The Charleston Academy of Music is committed to providing access to exceptional music education, performance and community outreach to all, regardless of age, skill, gender, ethnicity or income.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Charleston Stage Company Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pure Theatre. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Pure Theatre: $66,215 · Arts & CulturePure TheatreCHARLESTON GAILLARD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION: $63,500 · Arts & CultureCHARLESTON GAILLARD MANAGEMENT CORPORATIONCHARLESTON STAGE COMPANY INC: $58,978 · Arts & CultureCHARLESTON STAGE COMPANY INCCHAMBER MUSIC CHARLESTON: $56,340 · Arts & CultureCHAMBER MUSIC CHARLESTONCharleston Jazz: $47,455 · Arts & CultureCharleston JazzPalmetto City Ballet: $40,000 · Arts & CulturePalmetto City BalletCHARLESTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $30,000 · Arts & CultureCHARLESTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRASOUTH CAROLINA CONGRESS OF PARENTS AND TEACHERS: $25,000 · OtherSOUTH CAROLINA …Charleston Galliard Center: $20,921 · OtherCharleston Gall…Individual grant recipient: $15,421 · OtherIndividual gran…ENGAGING CREATIVE MINDS: $16,900 · Education
Arts & Culture$362,488Other$61,342Education$16,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPure Theatre: $66,215 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetCHARLESTON GAILLARD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION: $63,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHARLESTON STAGE COMPANY INC: $58,978 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCHAMBER MUSIC CHARLESTON: $56,340 over 3y, 6.6% of budgetCharleston Jazz: $47,455 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetPalmetto City Ballet: $40,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetCHARLESTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $30,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetENGAGING CREATIVE MINDS: $16,900 over 2y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gaylord and Dorothy Donnelley FoundationIL19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gaylord and Dorothy Donnelley Foundation · Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina Inc · Daniel Island Community Fund Inc · Henry & Sylvia Yaschik Foundation Inc · The Joanna Foundation · The Mark Elliott Motley Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Greater Memphis Inc · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Td Charitable Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Arts Etc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Arts Etc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Arts Etc?

    Find your warmest path to Arts Etc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Arts Etc’s filings →

    More from the funding graph