Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Arthur K Muselman Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$155k
Granted FY2020
14
Grants FY2020
7
States reached
$50k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

68% of Arthur K Muselman Family Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Taylor University, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Arthur K Muselman Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 10 organizations, $155k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
17
8
18
9
19
10
20
9
21
11
22
5
23
3
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

Education$1.5MReligion$220kEnvironment$108kArts & Culture$105kYouth Development$26kHuman Services$20kOther$221k
02FY2020 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k9 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SWISS VILLAGE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY$50,000
TAYLOR UNIVERSITY$29,750
GLOBAL DISCIPLES$15,000
HOPE INDIA MISSION$10,000
APARTMENT LIFE$10,000
SCAN$5,000
REMEDYLIVE$5,000
FORGE$5,000
YOUTH FOR CHRIST USA$5,000
ASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY$5,000
YOUTH FOR CHRIST OF ADAMS JAY$5,000
AMERSON MUSIC MINISTRIES$5,000
ALPHA MINISTRIES$5,000
PRINCE OF PEACE HOME FOR GIRLS$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SCAN: $5k → 12%SCAN: $5k → 12%SCAN: $5k → 12%SCAN: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
IN
PA
CA
CO
KY
VA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$759k · 21 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

21 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2020, 8 since wound down. Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
0

Total granted

$759k
$0

Still filing today

62%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionEducationEnvironmentArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BERNE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    2× · 2019–2024 · $108k · revenue +363%
  • GD
    GLOBAL DISCIPLES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $105k · revenue +93%
  • HI
    Hope India Mission Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $70k · revenue +44%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Reformed University Inc

    Provide education in theology, divinity, religious education, ministerial training, business and organizational leadership.

    Education
    2
    Christianity Today International

    Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

    Religion
    3
    Charis Bible College Inc

    Charis Bible Colleges, Inc. (CBC) was established to train and equip individuals to carry out the Gospel of Jesus Christ through practical application through mentoring, training, and teaching.

    Religion
    4
    American Baptist Theological Seminary dba American Baptist College

    Is to provide educational opportunities for gifted students who have limited academic experiences and resources but unlimited potential for leadership in society.

    Education
    5
    International Biblical Training Inc

    International Biblical Training is a teaching, training and equipping religious ministry. IBT staff provide theological teaching and training for the purpose of making Christian disciples who in turn train and disciple others in…

    Religion
    6
    Alliance for Transformational Ministry

    Enable christian organizations worldwide to initiate and strenghten ministries that lead people to become followers of jesus and transform communities out of cycles of poverty and disease.

    Religion
    7
    Pursue Ministries

    Pursue Ministries has the mission to pursue an eternal impact by introducing others to Jesus Christ, teaching the Bible and training disciples through one-on-one meetings, small groups, resources, retreats and seminars.

    Religion
    8
    Ambassador Baptist College

    Degreed courses offered to men and women in training and preparation to enter the ministry of preaching and teaching the Gospel.

    Education
    9
    Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

    Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

    10
    Alaska Bible College

    In accordance with the mandate of matthew 28:19-20 and 2 timothy 2:2, alaska bible college seeks to train servants who lead with christlike character by 1.) nurturing students in bible-based, academic programs that solidify their christian…

    Education
    11
    Abilene Christian School Inc

    The mission of Abilene Christian School, Inc. is to equip students to excel academically, serve meaningfully, and walk faithfully with God.

    Education
    12
    Dallas International University

    As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

    Education

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Global Disciples and the most unlike its peers is Iris Family Support Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    4
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    14/16
    Grantees still filing
    13/16
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    Taylor University — $1,437,000 · EducationTaylor University+4 more — $60,445 · EducationSWISS VILLAGE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY — $150,000 · OtherSWISS VILLA…YOUTH FOR CHRIST OF ADAMS JAY — $35,000 · OtherYOUTH FOR C…Kingdom Building Ministries — $16,000 · OtherKingdom Bui…ARISE CHURCH — $10,000 · Other+3 more — $10,000 · OtherHope India Mission Inc — $70,000 · ReligionHope India …SOULMEDIC MEDIA GROUP INC — $65,000 · ReligionSOULMEDIC M…ALPHA MINISTRIES INC — $35,000 · ReligionALPHA MINIS…AMERSON MUSIC MINISTRIES — $20,000 · ReligionAMERSON MUS…Apartment Life Inc — $20,000 · ReligionApartment L…A Time to Revive — $10,000 · ReligionBERNE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $107,500 · EnvironmentGLOBAL DISCIPLES — $105,000 · Arts & CultureYOUTH FOR CHRIST OF ADAMSBLACKFORD GRANT JAY AND WELLS COUNTIES INC — $25,500 · Youth DevelopmentIRIS FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER INC — $20,000 · Human Services
    Education$1,497,445Other$221,000Religion$220,000Environment$107,500Arts & Culture$105,000Youth Development$25,500Human Services$20,000

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTaylor University — $1,437,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetBERNE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $107,500 over 2y, 22% of budgetGLOBAL DISCIPLES — $105,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetHope India Mission Inc — $70,000 over 7y, 5.4% of budgetSOULMEDIC MEDIA GROUP INC — $65,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetALPHA MINISTRIES INC — $35,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY — $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH FOR CHRIST OF ADAMSBLACKFORD GRANT JAY AND WELLS COUNTIES INC — $25,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetAMERSON MUSIC MINISTRIES — $20,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetApartment Life Inc — $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetIRIS FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKingdom Building Ministries — $16,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHuntington University — $15,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetA Time to Revive — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFORGE INC — $10,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetWHEATON ACADEMY — $4,945 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds Taylor University
    • Who funds BERNE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    • Who funds GLOBAL DISCIPLES
    • Who funds Hope India Mission Inc
    • Who funds SOULMEDIC MEDIA GROUP INC
    • Who funds ALPHA MINISTRIES INC
    • Who funds ASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY
    • Who funds YOUTH FOR CHRIST OF ADAMSBLACKFORD GRANT JAY AND WELLS COUNTIES INC
    • Who funds AMERSON MUSIC MINISTRIES
    • Who funds Apartment Life Inc
    • Who funds IRIS FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER INC
    • Who funds Kingdom Building Ministries
    • Who funds Huntington University
    • Who funds A Time to Revive
    • Who funds FORGE INC
    • Who funds WHEATON ACADEMY

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA15.3× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Arthur K Muselman Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to Arthur K Muselman Family Foundation?

      Find your warmest path to Arthur K Muselman Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph