· Private foundation
Arthur Jr Dobles & Olive G Dobles Crut
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k9 grants · $44k
- $10k–50k37 grants · $669k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KEENE HOUSING KIDS COLLABORATIVE | $25,000 |
| HARBOR CARE | $25,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MANCHESTER | $25,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CENTRAL AND NORTH | $25,000 |
| THE GRANITE YMCA | $25,000 |
| FAMILY PROMISE OF SOUTHERN NH | $25,000 |
| YMCA OF GREATER NASHUA | $25,000 |
| SEACOAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL | $25,000 |
| WALPOLE VILLAGE SCHOOL PROJECT | $20,000 |
| NASHUA POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE | $20,000 |
| WHITE BIRCH CENTER | $20,000 |
| GREEN MOUNTAIN CHILDRENS CENTER | $20,000 |
| ARTS IN REACH | $20,000 |
| NORTHEAST WOODLAND CHARTER SCHOOL | $20,000 |
| GIRLS INC | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 22% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
90 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 72 since wound down; 28 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $450k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FPFamily Promise of Southern New Hampshire7× · 2019–2025 · $149k · revenue +107%
- WIWOMEN'S INFORMATION SERVICE (WISE) OF THE UPPER VALLEY INC5× · 2020–2024 · $115k · revenue +29%
- WWAYPOINT6× · 2020–2025 · $113k · revenue +47%
Funded once
- CLCHILDRENS LAW CENTERone grant, 2024 · $30k
- BDBRIDGES DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE SUPPone grant, 2020 · $28k
- MCMOORE CENTER SERVICES INCone grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +11%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
CityHope walks with individuals and families, empowering and equipping them with the necessary resources and skills needed to thrive in their communities. By providing support services to those experiencing financial hardships and housing…
ARCNH community recovery center is a Peer-to-Peer recovery coaching program that is designed to provide those on the path to recovery with individualized care and support from those with personal experiences with SUDS
The holding company for 615 Amherst St, Harbor Care's licensed residential treatment center for individuals and families living with substance use disorder.
Transitional and permanent supportive housing - provides shelter in the greater Manchester NH area. Services include housing, counseling (including substance abuse counseling), job search assistance, etc.
Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.
The Well's mission is to deliver real solutions in behavioral health through compassion, innovation, and collaboration. By building an inclusive community, we offer comprehensive treatment and resources to empower individuals of diverse…
Northern New Hampshire Healthcare Collaborative, Inc. will ensure access to quality care within the communities in which our patients live, provide local and high quality care with positive outcomes to our patients in Coos County while…
Home Health and Hospice Care provides trusted patient centered services that enhance each individual's independence and quality throughout life.
Build strong recovery communities, eliminate barriers to recovery supportive housing and promote best practice standards for New Hampshire alcohol and drug free homes. NHCORR is the sole New Hampshire affiliate of the National Alliance for…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Lakes Region Mental Health Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Austin 17 House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
117 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 117 of the 173 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Family Promise of Southern New Hampshire ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S INFORMATION SERVICE (WISE) OF THE UPPER VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds WAYPOINT ↗
- Who funds CONCORD COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS ↗
- Who funds Seacoast Youth Services ↗
- Who funds GRANITE UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds TWIN PINES HOUSING TRUST ↗
- Who funds Nashua Police Athletic League ↗
- Who funds MARGUERITE'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MANCHESTER ↗
- Who funds DISMAS HOME OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC ↗
- Who funds Families in Transition ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR SAFER COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds Easter Seals New Hampshire Inc ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE LEGAL ASSISTANCE INC ↗
- Who funds Gateways Community Services Inc ↗
- Who funds CONCORD COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CONCORD INC ↗
- Who funds ARTS IN REACH - ENCOURAGING GROWTH THROUGH THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds TRIANGLE CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds Belknap House ↗
- Who funds TLC FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Harbor Homes Inc ↗
- Who funds SEACOAST FAMILY PROMISE ↗
- Who funds HUNDRED NIGHTS INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOMELESS CENTER FOR STRAFFORD COUNTY ↗
- Who funds RIVERBEND COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH ↗
- Who funds MONADNOCK FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds THE FRONT DOOR AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE COMMUNITY LOAN FUND INC ↗
- Who funds MY FRIEND'S PLACE ↗
- Who funds New Hampshire Catholic Charities ↗
- Who funds ST GIANNA'S PLACE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Granite United Way · Madelaine G Vonweber Trust Todd Fahey & William Tucker Co-Trustees · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · Arthur L Getz Charitable Tr · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · Trust Uw Oleonda Jameson · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Samuel P Hunt Foundation · Bank of New Hampshire Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Arthur Jr Dobles & Olive G Dobles Crut funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Twin Pines Housing Trust — 100% of income from government
- Upper Valley Haven — 38% of income from government
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Arthur Jr Dobles & Olive G Dobles Crut?
Find your warmest path to Arthur Jr Dobles & Olive G Dobles Crut through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.