Skip to content

· Private foundation

Arthur H Korn Charitable Remainder Unitrust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$192k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$2.0MHealth$182kHuman Services$9k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $2.0M
$191,800
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
POPULAR SPRING ANIMAL SANCTUARY$191,800
FREE TO LIVE$191,800
BIG PURPLE BARN INC$191,800
ANIMAL CARE SANCTUARY$191,800
SAV-A-PET ADOPTION CENTER$191,800
PAWS OF HONOR$191,800
DEFENDERS OF ANIMAL RIGHTS INC$191,800
CALVERT CO ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE$191,800
FELINES CANINES INC$191,800
BRIDLE PATHS$181,800
Individual grant recipient$53,173
LOVE A CAT ENTERPRISES$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 50% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%ANIMAL CARE SANCTUARY: $192k → 12%FREE TO LIVE: $192k → 15%SAV-A-PET ADOPTION CENTER: $192k → 8%FELINES CANINES INC: $192k → 14%MISSISSIPPI MUTS: $3k → 18%BRIDLE PATHS: $182k → 4%PAWS OF HONOR: $192k → 7%FREEDOM HILL HORSE RESCUE: $3k → 5%LOVE A CAT ENTERPRISES: $10k → 6%HORSES HELP HEROS: $3k → 6%POPULAR SPRING ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $192k → 8%BIG PURPLE BARN INC: $192k → 11%DEFENDERS OF ANIMAL RIGHTS INC: $192k → 11%ANIMAL CARE SANCTUARY: $10k → 12%FREE TO LIVE: $10k → 15%SAV-A-PET ADOPTION CENTER: $10k → 8%FELINES CANINES INC: $10k → 14%PAWS OF HONOR: $10k → 7%LOVE A CAT ENTERPRISES: $10k → 6%HORSES HELP HEROS: $3k → 6%POPULAR SPRING ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $10k → 8%BIG PURPLE BARN INC: $10k → 11%DEFENDERS OF ANIMAL RIGHTS INC: $10k → 11%ANIMAL CARE SANCTUARY: $5k → 12%FREE TO LIVE: $5k → 15%SAV-A-PET ADOPTION CENTER: $5k → 8%FELINES CANINES INC: $5k → 14%CALVERT CO ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE: $192k → 5%DEFENDERS OF ANIMAL RIGHTS INC: $5k → 11%ANIMAL CARE SANCTUARY: $3k → 12%FREE TO LIVE: $3k → 15%SAV-A-PET ADOPTION CENTER: $3k → 8%FELINES CANINES INC: $3k → 14%CALVERT CO ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE: $10k → 5%ESCROWED CASH RESERVES: $53k → 6%DEFENDERS OF ANIMAL RIGHTS INC: $3k → 11%ANIMAL CARE SANCTUARY: $3k → 12%FREE TO LIVE: $3k → 15%SAV-A-PET ADOPTION CENTER: $3k → 8%FELINES CANINES INC: $3k → 14%CALVERT CO ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE: $5k → 5%DEFENDERS OF ANIMAL RIGHTS INC: $3k → 11%ANIMAL CARE SANCTUARY: $3k → 12%FREE TO LIVE: $3k → 15%SAV-A-PET ADOPTION CENTER: $3k → 8%FELINES CANINES INC: $3k → 14%CALVERT CO ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE: $3k → 5%DEFENDERS OF ANIMAL RIGHTS INC: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 21% of Arthur H Korn Charitable Remainder Unitrust’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 42% of the giving stays in MD; by stated purpose, 39%.

Arthur H Korn Charitable Remainder Unitrustlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 12 repeat orgs$240k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +79% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
2

Total granted

$2.0M
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%
+38%

Still filing today

58%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $235k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DO
    DEFENDERS OF ANIMAL RIGHTS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $221k · revenue +153%
  • AC
    ANIMAL CARE SANCTUARY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $221k · revenue +79%
  • FT
    FREE TO LIVE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $221k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • FI
    Felines Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +38%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Animal Haven Inc

The animal haven's misson is to provide a temporary, safe, caring and humane refuge for homeless dogs and cats and place these animals in quality adoptive homes.

Animals
2
Partners for Animal Welfare Society

Animal shelter for the protection and care of abused and neglected animals.

Animals
3
Humane Animal Partners

Founded in 2023, humane animal partners is a nonprofit no-kill animal care and adoption center. we are committed to providing for the needs of homeless and owned dogs and cats in our community. we make "friends for life" by connecting…

Animals
4
Furever Home Animal Rescue Inc

Animal rescue and placement

—
5
Living Free Non-Profit Animal Sanctuary

A no kill animal sanctuary that saves and finds homes for animals facing imminent shelter euthanasia

—
6
Freedom Ride Rescue

Freedom ride rescue is committed to saving dogs from overcrowded shelters and placing them in loving foster homes until they find their forever families. our mission is to create a no-kill state by rehabilitating and rehoming dogs while…

Animals
7
Pet Rescue Incorporated

Pet rescue inc. is committed to the rescue of abandoned and abused cats and dogs, and uses funds raised to provide veterinary care, neutering and spaying services, food and a home for these animals.

—
8
Pets Alive Inc

Our mission is to build a humane community supporting the human-animal bond by being a resource through rescue, adoption, intervention, education, and outreach.

Animals
9
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
10
Champaign County Animal Welfare League Inc

To provide a refuge for unwanted and/or abandoned dogs and cats, provide pet adoption, pet trainng, neutering and medical treatment, and rehabilitation, with no euthanization unless in the case of incurable illness.

Animals
11
Animal Adoption Foundation

Aaf is a no kill shelter for domestic animals that have been abused and abandoned. aaf provides and coordinates adoption, spay/nueter, and educational programs, which aim to reduce and control pet population. aaf maintains temporary…

Animals
12
Philadelphia Animal Welfare Society

Dedicated to saving philadelphias homeless and at-risk pets through rescue, adoption, and provision of veterinary care and other pet owner support services.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Defenders of Animal Rights Inc; the most unlike its peers is Freedom Hill Horse Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DEFENDERS OF ANIMAL RIGHTS INC: $221,300 · AnimalsDEFENDERS OF ANIMAL RIGHTS INCANIMAL CARE SANCTUARY: $221,300 · AnimalsANIMAL CARE SANCTUARYFREE TO LIVE INC: $221,300 · AnimalsFREE TO LIVE INCCALVERT ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE INC: $215,800 · AnimalsCALVERT ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE INCPAWS OF HONOR INC: $201,800 · AnimalsPAWS OF HONOR INCPOPLAR SPRING ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $201,800 · AnimalsPOPLAR SPRING ANIMAL SANCTUARY+2 more: $8,000 · AnimalsSAV-A-PET ADOPTION CENTER: $221,300 · OtherSAV-A-PET ADOPTION CENTERFELINES CANINES INC: $218,800 · OtherFELINES CANINES INCBIG PURPLE BARN INC: $201,800 · OtherBIG PURPLE BARN INCIndividual grant recipient: $53,173 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+3 more: $31,500 · OtherBRIDLE PATHS: $181,800 · HealthBRIDLE PA…
Animals$1,291,300Other$726,573Health$181,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDEFENDERS OF ANIMAL RIGHTS INC: $221,300 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetANIMAL CARE SANCTUARY: $221,300 over 8y, 7.7% of budgetFREE TO LIVE INC: $221,300 over 8y, 9.8% of budgetCALVERT ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE INC: $215,800 over 6y, 50% of budgetPAWS OF HONOR INC: $201,800 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetPOPLAR SPRING ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $201,800 over 2y, 20% of budgetBRIDLE PATHS: $181,800 over 1y, 39% of budgetFREEDOM HILL HORSE RESCUE: $5,500 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetFelines Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DEFENDERS OF ANIMAL RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL CARE SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds FREE TO LIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds CALVERT ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds PAWS OF HONOR INC ↗
  • Who funds POPLAR SPRING ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds BRIDLE PATHS ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM HILL HORSE RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds Felines Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Give Back FoundationWI13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Give Back Foundation · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Arthur H Korn Charitable Remainder Unitrust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Arthur H Korn Charitable Remainder Unitrust. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Arthur H Korn Charitable Remainder Unitrust’s filings →

    More from the funding graph