Skip to content

· Private foundation

Arthur & Helen Baer Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$386k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$827kEducation$645kHuman Services$279kHealth$255kYouth Development$135kRecreation & Sports$60kPublic Benefit$50kPublic Safety & Disaster$45kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $139k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $230k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER$75,000
JAZZ ST LOUIS$55,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
RANKEN JORDAN PEDIATRIC BRIDGE HOSPITAL$50,000
THE SHELDON ARTS FOUNDATION$35,000
BJC FOUNDATION$25,000
LIFT FOR LIFE ACADEMY$25,000
THE BACKSTOPPERS$15,000
BOOKS FOR STL KIDS$15,000
ARCHEOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICA$12,500
USO OF MISSOURI INC$11,000
VOLUNTEER LAWYERS & ACCOUNTANTS FOR THE ARTS$7,500
JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES$5,000
100 NEEDIEST CASES$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $436k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $80k → 21%SOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $75k → 21%SOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $75k → 21%SOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $50k → 21%SOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $47k → 21%SOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $44k → 21%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $10k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $10k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $10k → 11%MIGRANT & IMMIGRANT COMMUNITY ACTION PROJECT: $5k → 21%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $5k → 11%MIGRANT & IMMIGRANT COMMUNITY ACTION PROJECT: $5k → 21%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $5k → 11%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $10k → 21%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 20 repeat orgs$105k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
6

Total granted

$2.3M
$80k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+71%

Still filing today

65%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2019–2023 · $217k · revenue +9%
  • TR
    The Ranken-Jordan Home For Convalescent Crippled Children
    5× · 2020–2024 · $195k · revenue +38%
  • TS
    THE SHELDON ARTS FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $85k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • SF
    SHERWOOD FOREST CAMP INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $35k · revenue +71%
  • CG
    CONSULATE GENERAL OF JAMAICA
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • GM
    GOOD MEWS ANIMAL FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +79%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Louis Community Foundation

To promote the possibilities of charitable giving, helping charitable citizens understand how they can effectively provide for the community they love and the causes they care deeply about.

Philanthropy
2
St Louis Survivors' Legal Support Inc

SLSLS provides victims of domestic violence the assistance they need in filing petitions for orders of protection and obtaining full orders of protection in court.

Crime & Legal
3
Jewish Federation of St Louis

Jewish federation of st. louis mobilizes the jewish community and its human and financial resources to preserve and enhance jewish life in st. louis, in israel and around the world.

Philanthropy
4
St Louis Jewish Light

The st. louis jewish light is a non-profit, independent news source whose mission is to inform, inspire, educate, and connect the st. louis jewish community.

—
5
Greater St Louis Inc

Greater st. louis, inc. brings together business and civic leaders to create jobs, drive inclusive economic growth, and increase the st. louis metro area's global competitiveness. we speak with a unified voice, lead with a bold agenda, and…

Community Improvement
6
Mission St Louis

Mission: st. louis empowers individuals for social and economic growth through relationships and opportunity.

Community Improvement
7
St Louis Sports Commission Inc

Foster economic growth and improved quality of life in the st. louis area by producing events, enhancing its national and international image as a premier sports region, and increasing community awareness of the value of sports.

—
8
St Louis Economic Development Partnership

Economic development.

—
9
The Saint Louis Zoo Association

The saint louis zoo association was established to support and enhance the saint louis zoo by providing facilities, funds, and advice. the association provides direct financial support to the zoo for renovations, new facilities, programs,…

Animals
10
St Louis Shakespeare Festival

Fostering community and joy across the st. louis region through the shakespearean tradition of art for all.

Arts & Culture
11
St Louis Art Museum Foundation

The sole purpose of the foundation is to support the saint louis art museum, including but not limited to fundraising and other activities and assisting in financing expansion and renovation of its facilities.

Arts & Culture
12
St Louis Association of Community Organizations

Community Development and Community Center and social services

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family Services of St Louis; the most unlike its peers is Good Mews Animal Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTER FOR CONTEMPORARY ARTS: $220,000 · OtherCENTER FOR CONTEMPORARY ARTSIndividual grant recipient: $190,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGIRLS INC: $100,000 · OtherGIRLS INCUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATION USO OF MISSOURI INC: $63,750 · OtherUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATION USO OF MISSOURI…ARCHEOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $63,500 · OtherARCHEOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICATHE GREATER ST LOUIS ARTS AND EDUCATION COUNCIL: $62,000 · OtherTHE GREATER ST LOUIS ARTS AND EDUCATION COU…THE LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherTHE LEADERSHIP FOUNDATIONTHE BACKSTOPPERS INC FKA POLICEMEN & FIREMEN FUND OF ST LOUIS: $45,000 · Other+7 more: $115,000 · Other+7 moreJAZZ ST LOUIS: $362,500 · Arts & CultureJAZZ ST LOUISTHE SHELDON ARTS FOUNDATION: $85,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SHELDON ARTS FOUND…ST LOUIS VOLUNTEER LAWYERS AND ACCOUNTANTS FOR THE ARTS: $33,500 · Arts & CultureST LOUIS VOLUNTEER LAW…SOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $370,500 · Human ServicesSOUTHSIDE EARLY CHIL…JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF ST LOUIS: $45,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVIC…+2 more: $20,000 · Human ServicesST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $216,800 · EducationST LOUIS UNIV…BOOKS FOR STL KIDS: $57,500 · EducationBOOKS FOR STL…The Ranken-Jordan Home For Convalescent Crippled Children: $195,000 · HealthThe Ranke…LIFT FOR LIFE ACADEMY INC: $60,000 · Recreation & SportsSHERWOOD FOREST CAMP INC: $35,000 · Youth Development
Other$909,250Arts & Culture$481,000Human Services$435,500Education$274,300Health$195,000Recreation & Sports$60,000Youth Development$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $370,500 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetJAZZ ST LOUIS: $362,500 over 6y, 3.6% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $216,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Ranken-Jordan Home For Convalescent Crippled Children: $195,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SHELDON ARTS FOUNDATION: $85,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATION USO OF MISSOURI INC: $63,750 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetTHE GREATER ST LOUIS ARTS AND EDUCATION COUNCIL: $62,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetLIFT FOR LIFE ACADEMY INC: $60,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBOOKS FOR STL KIDS: $57,500 over 6y, 15% of budgetTHE BACKSTOPPERS INC FKA POLICEMEN & FIREMEN FUND OF ST LOUIS: $45,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF ST LOUIS: $45,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSHERWOOD FOREST CAMP INC: $35,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetST LOUIS VOLUNTEER LAWYERS AND ACCOUNTANTS FOR THE ARTS: $33,500 over 5y, 5.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD MEWS ANIMAL FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMigrant and Immigrant Community Action Project: $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetPEDAL THE CAUSE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER ↗
  • Who funds JAZZ ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds The Ranken-Jordan Home For Convalescent Crippled Children ↗
  • Who funds THE SHELDON ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATION USO OF MISSOURI INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GREATER ST LOUIS ARTS AND EDUCATION COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds LIFT FOR LIFE ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds BOOKS FOR STL KIDS ↗
  • Who funds THE BACKSTOPPERS INC FKA POLICEMEN & FIREMEN FUND OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds SHERWOOD FOREST CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS VOLUNTEER LAWYERS AND ACCOUNTANTS FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC ↗
  • Who funds GOOD MEWS ANIMAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Migrant and Immigrant Community Action Project ↗
  • Who funds PEDAL THE CAUSE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community FoundationMO28.1× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Jewish Federation of St Louis · Edward Jones Foundation · Sam and Marilyn Fox Foundation · Jordan Mary R & Ettie a Charitable · Youthbridge Community Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Arthur & Helen Baer Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Arthur & Helen Baer Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Arthur & Helen Baer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph