· Private foundation
Armotte Boyer Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k9 grants · $45k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES DAYTON | $15,000 |
| ARTEMIS CENTER FOR ALTERNATIVES TO | $10,000 |
| CRAYONS TO CLASSROOMS | $5,000 |
| UNITED REHABILITATION SERVICES OF | $5,000 |
| BRUNNER LITERACY CENTER | $5,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL | $5,000 |
| KIDS IN NEW DIRECTIONS INC | $5,000 |
| THE VICTORY PROJECT | $5,000 |
| ELIZABETH'S NEW LIFE CENTER | $5,000 |
| DAYBREAK | $5,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $64k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TVTHE VICTORY PROJECT LLC2× · 2019–2025 · $26k · revenue +248%
- ENELIZABETH'S NEW LIFE CENTER INC3× · 2021–2025 · $19k · revenue +17%
- NBNOVA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INC2× · 2022–2023 · $17k · revenue +7%
Funded once
- SLST LUKE MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCHone grant, 2020 · $20k
- ACAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INCone grant, 2020 · $20k
- UWUNITED WAY OF GREATER DAYTONone grant, 2019 · $18k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote community by nuturing children and empowering familites in a christian environment by providing childcare services and supportive services for families.
Daybreak saves young lives by demonstrating love and bringing hope for their future.
The mission of school choice ohio is to protect and expand children's educational options through ensuring choice in quality schools and other places of learning, thereby supporting systemic reform of k-12 education across the state.
Greater cleveland volunteers enriches the community and indivuduals through volunteer service. volunteers age 18 and older are recruited and placed in the agency's programs or referred to local nonprofit or public organizations to help…
Ohio hills health services is a non-profit health care operation, organized by communities in eastern ohio to promote healthy lifestyles and to provide preventative and comprehensive medical and dental care for area residents. the primary…
At united way of north central ohio, we bring people, organizations, and resources together to create solutions that improve the lives of every person in every community in our region.
Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.
We are the premier childrens mental health agency that reduces the suffering experienced by children who have emotional problems related to depression, anxiety, and behavior like adhd. untreated, these problems can lead to failure in…
Judson care center's mission, as a charitable, christian organization, is to use its resources to meet the housing, health care, social, physical and spiritual needs of its constituents without regards to race, color, creed, national…
Ensuring the safety and well-being of children entrusted to our care while empowering them to prepare for the future.
The mission of sunlight village is to provide mental health, youth development and nutritional programs and services within inner-city, west dayton as we fulfill our vision to address disparities for the underserved in all communities.
The mission of ohio valley goodwill industries rehabilitation center, inc. is to provide vocational rehabilitation, training, and employment services to individuals with either disabilities or social and economic barriers to full employment
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ronald Mcdonald House Charities Dayton and the most unlike its peers is With Gods Grace. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE VICTORY PROJECT LLC ↗
- Who funds ELIZABETH'S NEW LIFE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NOVA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES DAYTON ↗
- Who funds DAYBREAK INC ↗
- Who funds CHOICES IN COMMUNITY LIVING INC ↗
- Who funds THE MUSE MACHINE INC ↗
- Who funds KETTERING PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds We Care Arts Inc ↗
- Who funds OVERFIELD EARLY CHILDHOOD PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF DAYTON INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED REHABILITATION SERVICES OF GREATER DAYTON ↗
- Who funds THE BRUNNER LITERACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds ARTEMIS CENTER FOR ALTERNATIVES TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds HOMEFULL ↗
- Who funds BRUKNER NATURE CENTER ↗
- Who funds WITH GODS GRACE ↗
- Who funds GOOD NEIGHBOR HOUSE ↗
- Who funds CRAYONS TO CLASSROOMS ↗
- Who funds Kids in New Directions ↗
- Who funds University of Dayton ↗
- Who funds CLOTHES THAT WORK ↗
- Who funds BRETHREN RETIREMENT COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds K12 GALLERY FOR YOUNG PEOPLE ↗
- Who funds MIAMI VALLEY MEALS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Dayton Foundation · Mathile Family Foundation · Dayton Foundation Plus Inc · Dayton Foundation Depository · Iddings Benevolent Trust Xxxxx5009 · The Dayton Power and Light Company Foundation Dba Aes Ohio Foundation · Virginia W Kettering Foundation Xxxxx3003 · Levin Family Foundation · The United Way of the Greater Dayton Area · The Fred and Alice Wallace Charitable Memorial Foundation · Synchrony Foundation · The CareSource Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Armotte Boyer Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.