Skip to content

· Private foundation

Arizona Healthiest State Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$303k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$303k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$399kHuman Services$2kPhilanthropy$1kCommunity Improvement$782Housing & Shelter$781
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$302,767
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARIZONA HOSPITAL AND HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$302,767
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $781) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CIRCLE THE CITY: $781 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northern Arizona Healthcare Corporation

Improving health, healing people.

Health
2
Marana Health Center Inc

Improving our community by providing exceptional, whole-person healthcare.

Health
3
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
4
Chiricahua Community Health Centers Inc

Caring for patients, building healthy communities.

Health
5
Honorhealth

Honorhealth's mission is to improve the health and well-being of those we serve.

Health
6
North Country Healthcare Inc

To provide accessible, affordable, comprehensive, quality primary healthcare in an atmosphere of respect, dignity, and cultural sensitivity.

—
7
Tmc Healthcare

Our mission is to provide exceptional health care with compassion.

Health
8
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
9
Marin Community Clinic

To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.

Health
10
Southwest Medical Center

To be the leading provider of excellent healthcare for the communities we serve.

Health
11
San Juan Regional Medical Center

Better is our mission, improving lives through personalized health and care

Health
12
United Community Health Center - Maria Auxiliadora Inc

United community health care center - maria auxiliadora, inc., a federally qualified health center (fqhc), is a medical home that provides primary and preventative health care to the population of southern arizona and is open to all…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Benson Hospital Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Western Az Reg Medical Auxiliary. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 130 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
22/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ARIZONA HOSPITAL AND HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $302,767 · HealthARIZONA HOSPITAL AND HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION+17 more: $13,282 · Health+108 more: $84,374 · Other+108 moreWestern AZ Reg Medical Auxiliary: $782 · PhilanthropyIMMANUEL CAMPUS OF CARE FOUNDATION: $781 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc: $500 · PhilanthropyCIRCLE THE CITY: $781 · Human Services
Health$316,049Other$84,374Philanthropy$2,063Human Services$781

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetARIZONA HOSPITAL AND HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $302,767 over 1y, 46% of budgetTHE GUIDANCE CENTER INC: $782 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUN LIFE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC: $782 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVALLE DEL SOL INC: $782 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTucson Medical Center: $782 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNSET COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $782 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWINSLOW INDIAN HEALTH CARE CENTER INC: $782 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEL RIO SANTA CRUZ NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER INC: $781 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARIPOSA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $781 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF HAVASU INC: $781 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHORIZON HEALTH AND WELLNESS INC: $781 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMt Graham Regional Medical Center Inc: $781 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHANDMAKER JEWISH SERVICES FOR THE AGING: $781 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HEALTH NETWORK: $781 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAJO COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $781 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIVE HEALTH: $781 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBENSON HOSPITAL CORPORATION: $781 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANYONLANDS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $781 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADELANTE HEALTHCAREINC: $781 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNTAIN PARK HEALTH CENTER: $781 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCIRCLE THE CITY: $781 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCREEK VALLEY HEALTH CLINIC: $781 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFlagstaff Medical Center: $781 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH ACCESS TO HEALTH: $781 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ARIZONA HOSPITAL AND HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE GUIDANCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Western AZ Reg Medical Auxiliary ↗
  • Who funds SUN LIFE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds VALLE DEL SOL INC ↗
  • Who funds Tucson Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds SUNSET COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WINSLOW INDIAN HEALTH CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds EL RIO SANTA CRUZ NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MARIPOSA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ33.7× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Delta Dental Plan of Arizona Charitable Foundation and Trust · American Cancer Society Inc · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · Direct Relief · Mercy Care · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · St Mary's Food Bank Alliance · Arizona Family Health Partnership · Arizona Hospital & Healthcare Association · Health First Foundation-Northern Arizona · Community Foundation for Southern Arizona

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Arizona Healthiest State Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Arizona Healthiest State Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 130 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Arizona Healthiest State’s filings →

    More from the funding graph