Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Arizona Hospital & Healthcare Association

Bringing together diverse voices to advance health and healthcare in arizona.

$345k
Granted FY2023
19
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
0172% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20192023.

Health$291kCivil Rights$182kOther$187k
02FY2023 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 19 grants below total $333,670 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $345,170 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $11,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COBRE VALLEY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER$40,125
BENSON HOSPITAL$30,250
VALLEYWISE HEALTH$30,000
SAN CARLOS RESERVATION$20,500
MOUNT GRAHAM REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER$20,250
CANYON VISTA MEDICAL CENTER$20,250
HAVASU REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER$20,125
LITTLE COLORADO MEDICAL CENTER$20,125
LA PAZ REGIONAL HOSPITAL$20,125
NORTHERN COCHISE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL$20,000
ARIZONANS FOR BETTER HEALTHCARE$11,545
HOLY CROSS HOSPITAL$10,250
GILA RIVER HEALTH CARE$10,125
COALITION TO PROTECT AMERICA'S HEALTHCARE$10,000
VALLEY VIEW MEDICAL CENTER$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ARIZONANS FOR BETTER HEALTHCARE: $95k → 11%GILA RIVER HEALTH CARE: $10k → 11%MOUNT GRAHAM REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $20k → 15%HAVASU REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $20k → 17%BENSON HOSPITAL: $30k → 18%COBRE VALLEY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $40k → 19%HOLY CROSS HOSPITAL: $10k → 19%LA PAZ REGIONAL HOSPITAL: $20k → 20%LITTLE COLORADO MEDICAL CENTER: $20k → 26%SAGE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $10k → 28%AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE: $10k → 14%ARIZONANS FOR BETTER HEALTHCARE: $76k → 11%GILA RIVER HEALTH CARE: $10k → 11%MOUNT GRAHAM REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $10k → 15%HAVASU REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $10k → 17%BENSON HOSPITAL: $20k → 18%COBRE VALLEY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $10k → 19%HOLY CROSS HOSPITAL: $10k → 19%LA PAZ REGIONAL HOSPITAL: $10k → 20%LITTLE COLORADO MEDICAL CENTER: $10k → 26%WHITE MOUNTAIN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $10k → 28%AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE: $6k → 14%ARIZONANS FOR BETTER HEALTHCARE: $12k → 11%SAN CARLOS RESERVATION: $21k → 15%VALLEY VIEW MEDICAL CENTER: $10k → 17%COPPER QUEEN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL: $10k → 18%VALLEYWISE HEALTH: $30k → 11%SAN CARLOS RESERVATION: $10k → 15%CANYON VISTA MEDICAL CENTER: $20k → 18%VALLEYWISE HEALTH: $20k → 11%NORTHERN COCHISE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL: $20k → 15%CANYON VISTA MEDICAL CENTER: $10k → 18%ARIZONA STATE HOSPITAL: $10k → 11%NORTHERN COCHISE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$601k · 14 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
6

Total granted

$601k
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+50%

Still filing today

64%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
HealthCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BH
    BENSON HOSPITAL CORPORATION
    3× · 2020–2023 · $50k · revenue +28%
  • CV
    Cobre Valley Regional Medical Center
    3× · 2020–2023 · $50k · revenue +65%
  • MG
    Mt Graham Regional Medical Center Inc
    3× · 2020–2023 · $30k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • CT
    COALITION TO STRENGTHEN AMERICA'S HEALTH CAREgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +910%
  • VV
    VALLEY VIEW MEDICAL CENTER AUXILIARY
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • SO
    State of Arizona
    one grant, 2023 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
2
Northern Arizona Healthcare Corporation

Improving health, healing people.

Health
3
Banner Medical Group

To assist banner health complete its mission, banner medical group (bmg) was created to make health care easier, so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
4
Banner Medical Group Colorado

Assist banner health to complete its mission to make health care easier, so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
5
Washoe Barton Medical Clinic

Our mission is to care for your health and wellness. Our vision is to strengthen our community by providing accessible, affordable, high quality healthcare to all.

Health
6
San Juan Regional Medical Center

Better is our mission, improving lives through personalized health and care

Health
7
Moab Valley Healthcare Inc

Our dedicated team puts the patient first, delivers quality cost-effective healthcare and promotes wellness to all we serve.

Health
8
Southwest Medical Center

To be the leading provider of excellent healthcare for the communities we serve.

Health
9
Methodist Medical Center

Methodist Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
10
Southern New Hampshire Medical Center

Southern New Hampshire Medical Center is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve. Southern New Hampshire Medical Center is a provider of choice, delivering…

Health
11
Cumberland Medical Center

Cumberland Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
12
Fort Loudoun Medical Center

Fort Loudoun Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Verde Valley Medical Center and the most unlike its peers is Havasu Regional Medical Ctr Auxiliary. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Health CentersArizona Policy AdvocacyCommunity Service Organizat…Hospital Foundation NetworksHospital Systems
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 50 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number29%0%<5yr17%4%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr14%25%20–35yr10%25%35–55yr11%38%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value29%0%<5yr17%33%5–10yr19%2%10–20yr14%29%20–35yr10%9%35–55yr11%27%55yr+

The field is 29% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/31
the rest of the field
16%
3,234/19,623

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
18/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Cobre Valley Regional Medical Center — $50,125 · HealthCobre Valley Regional Medical CenterVALLEYWISE HEALTH FOUNDATION — $50,000 · HealthVALLEYWISE HEALTH FOUNDATIONMt Graham Regional Medical Center Inc — $30,250 · HealthMt Graham Regional Medical Center IncLa Paz Regional Hospital — $30,125 · HealthLa Paz Regional HospitalHAVASU REGIONAL MEDICAL CTR AUXILIARY — $30,125 · HealthHAVASU REGIONAL MEDICAL CTR AUXILIARYLITTLE COLORADO MEDICAL CENTER — $30,125 · HealthLITTLE COLORADO MEDICAL CENTERNORTHERN COCHISE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC — $30,000 · HealthNORTHERN COCHISE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INCCOALITION TO STRENGTHEN AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE — $10,000 · HealthNAVAJO HEALTH FOUNDATION - SAGE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC — $10,000 · HealthBISBEE HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION INC — $10,000 · HealthWhite Mountain Regional Medical Center — $10,000 · HealthBENSON HOSPITAL CORPORATION — $50,250 · OtherBENSON HOSPITAL CORPORATIONSan Carlos Apache Tribe V00523 — $30,500 · OtherSan Carlos Apache Tribe V00523CANYON VISTA MEDICAL CENTER — $30,250 · OtherCANYON VISTA MEDICAL CENTERHOLY CROSS HOSPITAL — $20,250 · OtherHOLY CROSS HOSPITALGILA RIVER HEALTH CARE CORPORATION — $20,125 · OtherGILA RIVER HEALTH CARE CORPORATI…AHA PAC (Fund for Political Education) — $15,965 · OtherAHA PAC (Fund for Political Educ…VALLEY VIEW MEDICAL CENTER AUXILIARY — $10,000 · OtherVALLEY VIEW MEDICAL CENTER AUXIL…State of Arizona — $10,000 · OtherState of ArizonaARIZONANS FOR BETTER HEALTHCARE — $182,449 · Civil RightsARIZONANS FOR BETTER HEALTHCARE
Health$290,750Other$187,340Civil Rights$182,449

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetARIZONANS FOR BETTER HEALTHCARE — $182,449 over 3y, 100% of budgetBENSON HOSPITAL CORPORATION — $50,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCobre Valley Regional Medical Center — $50,125 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEYWISE HEALTH FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMt Graham Regional Medical Center Inc — $30,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLa Paz Regional Hospital — $30,125 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLITTLE COLORADO MEDICAL CENTER — $30,125 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHERN COCHISE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOALITION TO STRENGTHEN AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNAVAJO HEALTH FOUNDATION - SAGE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBISBEE HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWhite Mountain Regional Medical Center — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ20.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Arizona Healthiest State Foundation · Health First Foundation-Northern Arizona · National Indian Health Board · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Arizona Hospital & Healthcare Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Arizona Hospital & Healthcare Association?

    Find your warmest path to Arizona Hospital & Healthcare Association through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $8k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph