· Public charity
Arizona Family Health Partnership
To make sexual and reproductive healthcare accessible to everyone
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k4 grants · $110k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $337k
- $250k+8 grants · $4.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EL RIO COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER | $981,820 |
| MOUNTAIN PARK HEALTH CENTER | $832,731 |
| PIMA COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT | $584,000 |
| CHIRICAHUA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS | $444,750 |
| PINAL COUNTY DIVISION OF PUBLIC | $397,081 |
| SOUTHWEST CENTER FOR HIVAIDS | $312,125 |
| WESLEY HEALTH CARE CENTER INC | $283,172 |
| CANYONLANDS HEALTHCARE | $281,546 |
| COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF YAVAPAI | $136,652 |
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS ARIZONA | $135,006 |
| 1N10 INC | $65,249 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD ARIZONA | $42,792 |
| CIHUAPACTLI COLLECTIVE | $30,000 |
| CAN COMMUNITY HEALTH | $20,840 |
| PHOENIX CHILDRENS HOSPITAL | $16,250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +83% since the first grant, against -76% for the ones you funded once.
20 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PPPLANNED PARENTHOOD ARIZONA INC7× · 2017–2024 · $5.7M · revenue +9%
- EREL RIO SANTA CRUZ NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER INC7× · 2017–2024 · $5.0M · revenue +126%
- MPMOUNTAIN PARK HEALTH CENTER7× · 2017–2024 · $4.2M · revenue +86%
Funded once
- SOState of Arizonaone grant, 2022 · $111k
- PCPHOENIX CHILDRENS HOSPITALone grant, 2019 · $66k
- GWGO WITH THE FLOW INCone grant, 2022 · $40k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Mission: cultivate health by supporting individuals and the community at every step of their journey. vision: lead a future in which accessible, high-quality care sets the standard for all. adelante healthcare, a federally qualified health…
The vision of desert senita community health center states: your center for healing and wellness. the mission is quality, local, affordable healthcare for all. desert senita community health center is the sole provider of primary medical,…
Sun life family health center delivers affordable, accessible and high-quality health services, wellness and education to all people.
To provide accessible, affordable, comprehensive, quality primary healthcare in an atmosphere of respect, dignity, and cultural sensitivity.
Improving our community by providing exceptional, whole-person healthcare.
Improving health, healing people.
Penobscot Community Health Center (PCHC) is a non-profit organization incorporated in 1997 that is governed by a Board of community volunteers and is the largest Federally Qualified Health Center in Maine. PCHC is driven by its mission…
United community health care center - maria auxiliadora, inc., a federally qualified health center (fqhc), is a medical home that provides primary and preventative health care to the population of southern arizona and is open to all…
Codac provides tools, support and services to individuals, families, and communities so they may live with dignity, free from the harmful effects of mental illness, substance use disorders and trauma.
Honorhealth's mission is to improve the health and well-being of those we serve.
To promote and facilitate the development and delivery of affordable and accessible primary healthcare for everyone in arizona through advocacy, education and technical assistance.
Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chiricahua Community Health Centers Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cihuapactli Collective. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD ARIZONA INC ↗
- Who funds EL RIO SANTA CRUZ NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN PARK HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds WESLEY COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CANYONLANDS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds Chiricahua Community Health Centers Inc ↗
- Who funds PRISMA COMMUNITY CARE (FKA SOUTHWEST CENTER HIV/AIDS INC) ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS ARIZONA INC ↗
- Who funds UTAH NAVAJO HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds 1N10 INC ↗
- Who funds Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds NATIVE HEALTH ↗
- Who funds Arizona Youth Partnership ↗
- Who funds Cihuapactli Collective ↗
- Who funds MARIPOSA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CAN COMMUNITY HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds EBONY HOUSE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · American Cancer Society Inc · St Mary's Food Bank Alliance · Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · Direct Relief · Delta Dental Plan of Arizona Charitable Foundation and Trust · Arizona Healthiest State Foundation · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Aunt Rita's Foundation · 100 Club of Arizona · Reach Out and Read Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Arizona Family Health Partnership funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Can Community Health Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.