Skip to content
Arizona Family Health Partnership at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Arizona Family Health Partnership

To make sexual and reproductive healthcare accessible to everyone

$4.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$982k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$37MRecreation & Sports$823kCivil Rights$402kArts & Culture$106k
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $110k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $337k
  • $250k+8 grants · $4.1M
$281,546
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EL RIO COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$981,820
MOUNTAIN PARK HEALTH CENTER$832,731
PIMA COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT$584,000
CHIRICAHUA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS$444,750
PINAL COUNTY DIVISION OF PUBLIC$397,081
SOUTHWEST CENTER FOR HIVAIDS$312,125
WESLEY HEALTH CARE CENTER INC$283,172
CANYONLANDS HEALTHCARE$281,546
COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF YAVAPAI$136,652
SPECIAL OLYMPICS ARIZONA$135,006
1N10 INC$65,249
PLANNED PARENTHOOD ARIZONA$42,792
CIHUAPACTLI COLLECTIVE$30,000
CAN COMMUNITY HEALTH$20,840
PHOENIX CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$16,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WESLEY HEALTH CARE CENTER INC: $473k → 11%WESLEY HEALTH CARE CENTER INC: $435k → 11%WESLEY HEALTH CARE CENTER INC: $419k → 11%WESLEY HEALTH CARE CENTER INC: $411k → 11%WESLEY HEALTH CARE CENTER INC: $283k → 11%WESLEY HEALTH CARE CENTER: $242k → 11%WESLEY HEALTH CARE CENTER: $234k → 11%WESLEY HEALTH CARE CENTER: $201k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$38M · 20 repeat orgs$257k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +83% since the first grant, against -76% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
5

Total granted

$38M
$257k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
-76%

Still filing today

80%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsCivil RightsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD ARIZONA INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $5.7M · revenue +9%
  • ER
    EL RIO SANTA CRUZ NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $5.0M · revenue +126%
  • MP
    MOUNTAIN PARK HEALTH CENTER
    7× · 2017–2024 · $4.2M · revenue +86%

Funded once

  • SO
    State of Arizona
    one grant, 2022 · $111k
  • PC
    PHOENIX CHILDRENS HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2019 · $66k
  • GW
    GO WITH THE FLOW INC
    one grant, 2022 · $40k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Adelante Healthcareinc

Mission: cultivate health by supporting individuals and the community at every step of their journey. vision: lead a future in which accessible, high-quality care sets the standard for all. adelante healthcare, a federally qualified health…

Health
2
Ajo Community Health Center

The vision of desert senita community health center states: your center for healing and wellness. the mission is quality, local, affordable healthcare for all. desert senita community health center is the sole provider of primary medical,…

Health
3
Sun Life Family Health Center Inc

Sun life family health center delivers affordable, accessible and high-quality health services, wellness and education to all people.

Health
4
North Country Healthcare Inc

To provide accessible, affordable, comprehensive, quality primary healthcare in an atmosphere of respect, dignity, and cultural sensitivity.

—
5
Marana Health Center Inc

Improving our community by providing exceptional, whole-person healthcare.

Health
6
Northern Arizona Healthcare Corporation

Improving health, healing people.

Health
7
Penobscot Community Health Center

Penobscot Community Health Center (PCHC) is a non-profit organization incorporated in 1997 that is governed by a Board of community volunteers and is the largest Federally Qualified Health Center in Maine. PCHC is driven by its mission…

Health
8
United Community Health Center - Maria Auxiliadora Inc

United community health care center - maria auxiliadora, inc., a federally qualified health center (fqhc), is a medical home that provides primary and preventative health care to the population of southern arizona and is open to all…

Health
9
Codac Health Recovery & Wellness

Codac provides tools, support and services to individuals, families, and communities so they may live with dignity, free from the harmful effects of mental illness, substance use disorders and trauma.

—
10
Honorhealth

Honorhealth's mission is to improve the health and well-being of those we serve.

Health
11
Arizona Association of Community Health Centers Inc

To promote and facilitate the development and delivery of affordable and accessible primary healthcare for everyone in arizona through advocacy, education and technical assistance.

Health
12
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chiricahua Community Health Centers Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cihuapactli Collective. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
16/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD ARIZONA INC: $5,717,967 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD ARIZONA INCEL RIO SANTA CRUZ NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER INC: $4,992,276 · HealthEL RIO SANTA CRUZ NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER INCMOUNTAIN PARK HEALTH CENTER: $4,245,739 · HealthMOUNTAIN PARK HEALTH CENTERChiricahua Community Health Centers Inc: $1,924,870 · HealthChiricahua Community Health Centers IncPRISMA COMMUNITY CARE (FKA SOUTHWEST CENTER HIV/AIDS INC): $1,428,544 · HealthPRISMA COMMUNITY CARE (FKA SOUTHWEST CENTER HIV/AIDS INC)+6 more: $1,125,166 · Health+6 morePIMA ANIMAL CARE CENTER: $5,493,981 · OtherPIMA ANIMAL CARE CENTERPINAL COUNTY DIVISION OF PUBLIC: $3,478,830 · OtherPINAL COUNTY DIVISION OF PUBLICCANYONLANDS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $2,652,423 · OtherCANYONLANDS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF YAVAPAI: $1,972,254 · OtherCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF YAVAPAI+6 more: $815,818 · Other+6 moreWESLEY COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $2,697,424 · Human ServicesSPECIAL OLYMPICS ARIZONA INC: $823,274 · Recreation & Sports1N10 INC: $402,211 · Civil RightsCihuapactli Collective: $106,235 · Arts & Culture
Health$19,434,562Other$14,413,306Human Services$2,697,424Recreation & Sports$823,274Civil Rights$402,211Arts & Culture$106,235

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD ARIZONA INC: $5,717,967 over 7y, 15% of budgetEL RIO SANTA CRUZ NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER INC: $4,992,276 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetMOUNTAIN PARK HEALTH CENTER: $4,245,739 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetWESLEY COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $2,697,424 over 8y, 7.1% of budgetCANYONLANDS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $2,652,423 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetChiricahua Community Health Centers Inc: $1,924,870 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetPRISMA COMMUNITY CARE (FKA SOUTHWEST CENTER HIV/AIDS INC): $1,428,544 over 5y, 5.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS ARIZONA INC: $823,274 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetUTAH NAVAJO HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $539,668 over 6y, 0.3% of budget1N10 INC: $402,211 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetPhoenix Children's Hospital Foundation: $335,054 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetNATIVE HEALTH: $116,644 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetArizona Youth Partnership: $115,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetCihuapactli Collective: $106,235 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetMARIPOSA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $75,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCAN COMMUNITY HEALTH INC: $40,445 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEBONY HOUSE INC: $19,999 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD ARIZONA INC ↗
  • Who funds EL RIO SANTA CRUZ NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN PARK HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WESLEY COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CANYONLANDS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Chiricahua Community Health Centers Inc ↗
  • Who funds PRISMA COMMUNITY CARE (FKA SOUTHWEST CENTER HIV/AIDS INC) ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS ARIZONA INC ↗
  • Who funds UTAH NAVAJO HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds 1N10 INC ↗
  • Who funds Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds Arizona Youth Partnership ↗
  • Who funds Cihuapactli Collective ↗
  • Who funds MARIPOSA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CAN COMMUNITY HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds EBONY HOUSE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community Fou…American Cancer Socie…St Mary's Food Bank A…Community Foundation …Direct ReliefDelta Dental Plan of …Arizona Healthiest St…The Foundation for Co…Virginia G Piper Char…Aunt Rita's Foundation100 Club of ArizonaReach Out and Read Inc
Arizona Community FoundationAZ33.2× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · American Cancer Society Inc · St Mary's Food Bank Alliance · Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · Direct Relief · Delta Dental Plan of Arizona Charitable Foundation and Trust · Arizona Healthiest State Foundation · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Aunt Rita's Foundation · 100 Club of Arizona · Reach Out and Read Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Arizona Family Health Partnership funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Arizona Family Health Partnership. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Can Community Health Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Arizona Family Health Partnership’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home