Skip to content

· Public charity

Areawide Aging Agency

Identify needs of the elderly, determine available resources to fill those needs, evaluate their effectiveness, and coordinate existing programs and services for the elderly when feasible.

$5.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2.3M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$20MHuman Services$18MHealth$1.7MCrime & Legal$891kEducation$868kHousing & Shelter$678k
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 19 grants below total $5,217,997, the rows itemized in this filing. The $5,743,424 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $525,427 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $200k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $457k
  • $250k+4 grants · $4.6M
$50,964
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OK COUNTY SENIOR NUTRITIONSODEXO$2,349,638
AGING SERVICES INC$1,302,518
LOGAN COUNTY AGING SERVICES$523,585
COPTA-EMBARK$376,800
LEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA$116,800
NEWVIEW OKLAHOMA$80,000
REBUILDING TOGETHER$76,000
ST LUKE'S UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$70,000
CITY OF EL RENO$63,239
UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA$50,964
METROPOLITAN BETTER LIVING$42,513
FULL CIRCLE ADULT DAY CENTER$40,073
DAILY LIVING CENTERS INC$23,519
SALVATION ARMY - REDING SENIOR CENTER$23,272
SALVATION ARMY - SHARTEL TOWER'S SENIOR CENTER$21,003
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $10.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%AGING SERVICES INC: $1.4M → 13%AGING SERVICES INC: $1.4M → 13%AGING SERVICES INC: $1.3M → 13%AGING SERVICES INC: $1.2M → 13%AGING SERVICES INC: $1.2M → 13%AGING SERVICES INC: $1.1M → 13%Aging Services Inc: $858k → 13%AGING SERVICES INC: $798k → 13%AGING SERVICES INC: $550k → 13%FULL CIRCLE ADULT DAY CENTER: $40k → 13%FULL CIRCLE ADULT DAY CENTER: $35k → 13%FULL CIRCLE ADULT DAY CENTER: $26k → 13%FULL CIRCLE ADULT DAY CENTER: $19k → 13%FULL CIRCLE ADULT DAY CENTER: $12k → 13%FULL CIRCLE ADULT DAY CENTER: $9k → 13%DAILY LIVING CENTERS INC: $63k → 16%FULL CIRCLE ADULT DAY CENTER: $9k → 13%FULL CIRCLE ADULT DAY CENTER: $8k → 13%DAILY LIVING CENTERS INC: $56k → 16%FULL CIRCLE ADULT DAY CENTER: $8k → 13%DAILY LIVING CENTERS INC: $53k → 16%DAILY LIVING CENTERS INC: $41k → 16%DAILY LIVING CENTERS INC: $37k → 16%DAILY LIVING CENTERS INC: $30k → 16%DAILY LIVING CENTERS INC: $24k → 16%WOVEN LIFE: $25k → 16%Easter Seals of Oklahoma: $21k → 16%WOVEN LIFE: $19k → 16%WOVEN LIFE: $18k → 16%REACHING OUR CITY: $15k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$43M · 25 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
1

Total granted

$43M
$7k

Still filing today

48%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalFood & NutritionEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AS
    AGING SERVICES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $9.7M · revenue +32% · 75% of their budget
  • SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $984k · revenue +101%
  • LEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $891k · revenue +138%

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF MUSTANG
    one grant, 2019 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Circles of Caring Adult Day Health Foundation Inc

Circles of Caring Adult Day Health is a unique day-use program that provides a safe, caring, and nurturing atmosphere for adults and elders. We provide a wide range of services specialized to assist our participants with their medical,…

Human Services
2
Meals on Wheels of Norman Inc

To help improve nutrition by providing meal services to elderly, ill or disabled residents unable to prepare their own meals, and to improve the mental health of the isolated recipients by providing visitation.

Food & Nutrition
3
Southside Senior Citizen Center

Adults day care

Human Services
4
Ozark Senior Center

Providing services to Seniors

—
5
Living Center Inc

Enhancing the quality of life through integrated healthcare.

—
6
Docservies Inc

The organization's mission is to help maintain the independence of senior citizens in local communities by providing meal delivery, in-home chore services and rides to physicians and for other critical needs.

Human Services
7
Reliant Living Centers of Oklahoma Inc

None

Health
8
Meals On Wheels Senior Services

To keep the elderly and disabled citizens of Rockwall County living in their homes as long as safely possible through supportive services, nutritious meals, and daily human contact.

Human Services
9
Meals On Wheels-Bullhead City Az

Meals on Wheels delivers between 140-160 meals daily to homebound patients and serves approximately 50-60 clients daily at the Senior Center. The program averages between 40,000-45,000 meals yearly for seniors and disabled clients in…

Food & Nutrition
10
Jackson County Council On Aging

Provide services to local seniors to improve their quality of life and assist them in remaining in their homes

Human Services
11
Areawide Aging Agency

Identify needs of the elderly, determine available resources to fill those needs, evaluate their effectiveness, and coordinate existing programs and services for the elderly when feasible.

Human Services
12
Muleshoe Meals On Wheels Inc

The Muleshoe Meals on Wheels purpose is to engage in all activities necessary, useful, or expedient, through operative measures and active organizations, to promote and further the interests of the Senior citizens of the area. The purpose…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Aging Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Yukon Mobile Meals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OK County Senior NutritionSodexo: $9,752,416 · OtherOK County Senior NutritionSodexoCOPTA-EMBARK: $2,961,107 · OtherCOPTA-EMBARKUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA: $867,965 · OtherREBUILDING TOGETHER OKC INC: $677,819 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA: $561,458 · OtherST LUKE'S UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $554,890 · Other+9 more: $951,411 · Other+9 moreOklahoma County Senior Nutrition Development: $13,263,044 · HealthOklahoma County Senior Nutrition De…+1 more: $38,672 · HealthAGING SERVICES INC: $9,739,726 · Human ServicesAGING SERVICES INCSUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC: $983,839 · Human ServicesSUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC+5 more: $776,887 · Human Services+5 moreLEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC: $890,785 · Crime & LegalNEWVIEW OKLAHOMA INC: $609,850 · EmploymentYUKON MOBILE MEALS: $112,538 · Food & Nutrition
Other$16,327,066Health$13,301,716Human Services$11,500,452Crime & Legal$890,785Employment$609,850Food & Nutrition$112,538

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAGING SERVICES INC: $9,739,726 over 9y, 75% of budgetSUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC: $983,839 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetLEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC: $890,785 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER OKC INC: $677,819 over 9y, 17% of budgetNEWVIEW OKLAHOMA INC: $609,850 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetDaily Living Centers Inc: $302,592 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetMobile Meals of Oklahoma County Inc: $241,011 over 3y, 88% of budgetMETROPOLITAN BETTER LIVING CENTER: $211,814 over 9y, 2.6% of budgetFull Circle Adult Day Center Inc: $165,530 over 9y, 4.7% of budgetYUKON MOBILE MEALS: $112,538 over 8y, 31% of budgetWOVENLIFE INC: $82,140 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetNorthCare General Pershing Inc: $38,672 over 2y, 5.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Oklahoma County Senior Nutrition Development ↗
  • Who funds AGING SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER OKC INC ↗
  • Who funds NEWVIEW OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds Daily Living Centers Inc ↗
  • Who funds Mobile Meals of Oklahoma County Inc ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN BETTER LIVING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Full Circle Adult Day Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds VALIR PACE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YUKON MOBILE MEALS ↗
  • Who funds WOVENLIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds NorthCare General Pershing Inc ↗
  • Who funds REACHING OUR CITY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma City Community Foundation IncOK29.2× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Sarkeys Foundation · Kirkpatrick Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Inasmuch Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · The Merrick Foundation · Cresap Family Foundation · Harris Foundation Inc · American Fidelity Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Areawide Aging Agency funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Areawide Aging Agency. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 45%
  • Sunbeam Family Services Inc: 52% of income from government
  • Newview Oklahoma Inc: 45% of income from government
  • Legal Aid Services of Oklahoma Inc: 13% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Areawide Aging Agency?

Find your warmest path to Areawide Aging Agency through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Areawide Aging Agency’s filings →

More from the funding graph