Skip to content

Oklahoma · Public charity

Areawide Aging Agency

Identify needs of the elderly, determine available resources to fill those needs, evaluate their effectiveness, and coordinate existing programs and services for the elderly when feasible.

$5.7M
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
19
Itemized grants FY2025
18
Organizations funded FY2024
6%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$5.2M
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$50,964
Largest grant, FY2025
$2,349,638
Organizations funded a year
16 to 19
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$3.0M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 6% of the organizations Areawide Aging Agency funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EmploymentHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving17$5.2M6%
FY202418$5.4M6%
FY202317$5.3M0%
FY202218$5.1M6%
FY202117$5.2M12%
FY202018$4.6M6%
FY201919$3.8M21%
FY201816$4.0M0%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$20MHuman Services$18MHealth$1.7MCrime & Legal$891kEducation$868kHousing & Shelter$678k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Oklahoma County Senior Nutrition Development$13,263,0447n/a
OK County Senior NutritionSodexo$9,752,4169n/a
Aging Services Inc$9,739,726975%
Copta-Embark$2,961,1079n/a
Sunbeam Family Services Inc$983,83961%
Legal Aid Services of Oklahoma Inc$890,78591%
University of Oklahoma$867,9653n/a
Rebuilding Together Okc Inc$677,819917%
Newview Oklahoma Inc$609,85051%
University of Central Oklahoma$561,4589n/a
Show all 27 grantees
All grantees of Areawide Aging Agency by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Oklahoma County Senior Nutrition Development$13,263,0447n/a
OK County Senior NutritionSodexo$9,752,4169n/a
Aging Services Inc$9,739,726975%
Copta-Embark$2,961,1079n/a
Sunbeam Family Services Inc$983,83961%
Legal Aid Services of Oklahoma Inc$890,78591%
University of Oklahoma$867,9653n/a
Rebuilding Together Okc Inc$677,819917%
Newview Oklahoma Inc$609,85051%
University of Central Oklahoma$561,4589n/a
St Luke's United Methodist Church$554,8906n/a
Daily Living Centers Inc$302,59273%
Mobile Meals of Oklahoma County Inc$241,011388%
City of Edmond$223,0459n/a
Metropolitan Better Living Center$211,81493%
Full Circle Adult Day Center Inc$165,53095%
Valir Pace Foundation$141,8284n/a
Yukon Mobile Meals$112,538831%
City of El Reno$110,9394n/a
Eoc Technology Center Adult Day Service$86,8057n/a
Wovenlife Inc$82,14042%
The Salvation Army$75,1542n/a
Sr Citizens of El Reno$48,8294n/a
NorthCare General Pershing Inc$38,67225%
Temple Gardens$17,0002n/a
Reaching Our City Inc$14,8111n/a
City of Mustang$6,8001n/a

Where it is load-bearing

Areawide Aging Agency supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 3 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 12 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAging Services Inc: $9,739,726 over 9y, 75% of budgetSunbeam Family Services Inc: $983,839 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetLegal Aid Services of Oklahoma Inc: $890,785 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetRebuilding Together Okc Inc: $677,819 over 9y, 17% of budgetNewview Oklahoma Inc: $609,850 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetDaily Living Centers Inc: $302,592 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetMobile Meals of Oklahoma County Inc: $241,011 over 3y, 88% of budgetMetropolitan Better Living Center: $211,814 over 9y, 2.6% of budgetFull Circle Adult Day Center Inc: $165,530 over 9y, 4.7% of budgetYukon Mobile Meals: $112,538 over 8y, 31% of budgetWovenlife Inc: $82,140 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetNorthCare General Pershing Inc: $38,672 over 2y, 5.2% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 12.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma City Community Foundation IncOK29.2× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Sarkeys Foundation · Kirkpatrick Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Inasmuch Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · The Merrick Foundation · Cresap Family Foundation · Harris Foundation Inc · American Fidelity Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Areawide Aging Agency with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Areawide Aging Agency?

Find your warmest path to Areawide Aging Agency through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Areawide Aging Agency

How much does Areawide Aging Agency give?
Areawide Aging Agency reported 19 itemized grants totaling $5,217,997, out of $5,743,424 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 16 and 19 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Areawide Aging Agency fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Food & Nutrition (48%), Human Services (42%), Health (4%).
Who are Areawide Aging Agency's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Oklahoma County Senior Nutrition Development ($13M), OK County Senior NutritionSodexo ($9.8M), Aging Services Inc ($9.7M).
Does Areawide Aging Agency fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 6% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Areawide Aging Agency?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc, Communities Foundation of Oklahoma, Sarkeys Foundation.
Where is Areawide Aging Agency based?
Areawide Aging Agency is based in OK.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Areawide Aging Agency’s filings →

More from the funding graph