Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ardon & Iris Moore Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$703k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$425k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$1.3MHuman Services$351kEnvironment$149kEducation$117kHealth$67kPublic Safety & Disaster$50kCrime & Legal$44kArts & Culture$30kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $66k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $200k
  • $250k+1 grant · $425k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$425,000
FORT WORTH GARDEN CLUB$100,000
TSCRA DISASTER RELIEF FUND$50,000
COOKS CHILDREN HOSPITAL$50,000
CORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWORK$45,730
ONE SAFE PLACE$10,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY - GSB$10,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN$5,000
UT FOUNDATION$2,000
EXCHANGE CLUB - GOODFELLOW FUND$2,000
TEXAS WILDLIFE ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION$1,000
TOURETTE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC$1,000
REEF RENEWAL FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $350k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HAPPY HILL FARM: $1k → 10%JUSTIN'S PLACE: $1k → 11%CORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWORK: $225k → 11%CORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWORK: $75k → 11%CORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWORK: $46k → 11%CORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWORK: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 15 repeat orgs$314k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
28

Total granted

$2.8M
$208k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+70%

Still filing today

47%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $106k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’23’24
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentCrime & LegalPublic BenefitHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWORK INC
    4× · 2017–2024 · $348k · revenue +22%
  • SC
    Safe City Commission
    3× · 2019–2024 · $40k · revenue +8%
  • TA
    TOURETTE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $8k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • PARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXASgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $47k · revenue +113%
  • PG
    PHI GAMMA DELTA EDUCATIONAL FND
    one grant, 2017 · $24k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas a&M Research Foundation

To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.

Education
2
Texas Bar Foundation

The Foundation solicits charitable contributions and provides funding to enhance the rule of law and the system of justice in Texas, especially for programs that relate to the administration of justice; ethics in the legal profession;…

Crime & Legal
3
Texas Agricultural Land Trust Foundation

The Foundation provides financial and other resources in support exclusively for Texas Agricultural Land Trust ("TALT"), a Texas tax exempt nonprofit corporation, classified as a 501(c)(3) organization.

Food & Nutrition
4
Texas Business Hall of Fame Foundation

To recognize the accomplishments and contributions of our outstanding Texas business leaders and to perpetuate and inspire the values of entrepreneurial spirit, personal integrity, and community leadership in all generations of Texans.

Community Improvement
5
Texas Neurofibromatosis Foundation

To fund neurofibromatosis research and education and to provide for support groups for those facing the illness.

Health
6
Forty First Foundation

The forty first foundation supports and advances the university of texas at austin in its pursuit of excellence. we work closely with the office of the president to identify, fund, and implement strategic initiatives that enhance the…

Education
7
Texas Women's Foundation

Texas Women's Foundation invests in removing the barriers to women's economic security, stability, and success through targeted research and advocacy, intentional grant making and leadership programs.

—
8
Texas Access to Justice Foundation

The Texas Access to Justice Foundation is a nonprofit corporation organized as a funding source for legal services to indigent Texans in civil matters. The funding primarily generated by interest earned on lawyers' trust accounts (IOLTA)…

—
9
Dallas Seminary Foundation

To support the mission of Dallas Theological Seminary by offering charitable planned giving and other related services to friends of the Seminary.

Education
10
The University of Texas Foundation No 1

To support the university of texas system

—
11
Texas Water Foundation

Texas water foundation is a statewide nonprofit that provides educational resources and educational services on water in texas for decision makers, water professionals, and everyday texans. texas water foundation works in the areas of…

Environment
12
Texans Care for Children Inc

Texans Care for Children shapes public policies and brings Texans together to make children a statewide priority. We work so kids can have what they need to be healthy, secure, and thriving and so every Texan can have the best start to…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The University of Texas Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Fort Worth Garden Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
20/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FORT WORTH ZOO: $1,272,000 · OtherFORT WORTH ZOOIndividual grant recipient: $876,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+35 more: $314,798 · Other+35 moreCORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWORK INC: $347,505 · Human ServicesCORNERSTONE …+2 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesFort Worth Garden Club Inc: $100,550 · EnvironmentPARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS: $47,000 · EnvironmentTSCRA DISASTER RELIEF FUND: $50,000 · Public Safety & DisasterSafe City Commission: $40,000 · Crime & LegalBRIDGES TO LIFE: $4,000 · Crime & LegalTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $12,500 · EducationThe University of Texas Law School Foundation: $1,000 · EducationVan Cliburn Foundation Inc: $12,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$2,462,798Human Services$349,505Environment$147,550Public Safety & Disaster$50,000Crime & Legal$44,000Education$13,500Arts & Culture$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWORK INC: $347,505 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetFort Worth Garden Club Inc: $100,550 over 2y, 25% of budgetTSCRA DISASTER RELIEF FUND: $50,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetPARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS: $47,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSafe City Commission: $40,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTexas 2036: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBELLOSGUARDO FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTOURETTE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRIVERTREE ACADEMY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYoung America's Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGES TO LIFE: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUND OFF: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe University of Texas Law School Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN DIABETIC FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAPPY HILL FARM CHILDRENS HOME INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJordan Elizabeth Harris Foundation: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - AUSTIN: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds Fort Worth Garden Club Inc ↗
  • Who funds TSCRA DISASTER RELIEF FUND ↗
  • Who funds PARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds Safe City Commission ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Van Cliburn Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Texas 2036 ↗
  • Who funds BELLOSGUARDO FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TOURETTE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVERTREE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
  • Who funds MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC ↗
  • Who funds Young America's Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGES TO LIFE ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Tarrant Area Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds ACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds JUSTINS PLACE ↗
  • Who funds SOUND OFF ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sid W Richardson FoundationTX19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sid W Richardson Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Paul E Andrews Jr Foundation · Amon G Carter Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Winn-Dunaway Family Foundation · James and Dorothy Doss Foundation Inc · R4 Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ardon & Iris Moore Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ardon & Iris Moore Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ardon & Iris Moore Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ardon & Iris Moore Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ardon & Iris Moore’s filings →

    More from the funding graph