Skip to content

· Private foundation

Appelbaum-Kahn Foundation Co Connolly Switaj Fogler & Co LLP

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$47k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$157kEducation$141kCrime & Legal$57kFood & Nutrition$49kAnimals$37kCivil Rights$15kRecreation & Sports$12kPhilanthropy$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $26k
$3,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$358k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY$15,000
DONOR ADVISOR FUND$11,000
SITE SANTA FE$5,000
BERKSHIRE MUSIC SCHOOL$3,500
BERKSHIRE HUMANE SOCIETY INC$3,500
ROOTS RISING$3,000
COMMUNITY ACCESS TO ARTS$3,000
BERKSHIRE GROWN$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%IS 183 ART SCHOOL OF THE BERKSHIRES: $7k → 12%KCRW FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY: $12k → 17%SITE SANTA FE: $10k → 12%NEW MEXICO ASSOCIATION OF FOOD BANK: $5k → 14%SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER: $8k → 18%CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY: $25k → 17%IS 183 ART SCHOOL OF THE BERKSHIRES: $5k → 12%KCRW FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%SITE SANTA FE: $5k → 12%SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER: $8k → 18%CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 17%IS 183 ART SCHOOL OF THE BERKSHIRES: $5k → 12%KCRW FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 17%IS 183 ART SCHOOL OF THE BERKSHIRES: $4k → 12%THE RAPE FOUNDATION: $8k → 14%CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 17%KCRW FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 17%THE RAPE FOUNDATION: $8k → 14%CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 17%KCRW FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 17%THE RAPE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%KCRW FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%THE EMERLING-AKF FOUNDATION DAF: $25k → 12%THE RAPE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%BERKSHIRE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $8k → 12%THE EMERLING-TORRES FAMILY FOUND DA: $32k → 14%BERKSHIRE MUSIC SCHOOL: $5k → 12%DONOR ADVISOR FUND: $11k → 14%BERKSHIRE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $4k → 12%THE SHARK FUND: $5k → 14%BERKSHIRE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $4k → 12%THE SHARK FUND: $3k → 14%BERKSHIRE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $4k → 12%BERKSHIRE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $4k → 12%BERKSHIRE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $4k → 12%BERKSHIRE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $4k → 12%BERKSHIRE MUSIC SCHOOL: $4k → 12%INNER-CITY ARTS: $15k → 14%INNER-CITY ARTS: $5k → 14%COMMUNITY ACCESS TO ARTS: $4k → 12%SANTA MONICA-MALIBU EDUCATION FOUND: $6k → 14%COMMUNITY ACCESS TO ARTS: $4k → 12%SANTA MONICA-MALIBU EDUCATION FOUND: $5k → 14%COMMUNITY ACCESS TO ARTS: $4k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$399k · 18 repeat orgs$94k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
11

Total granted

$399k
$83k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+15%

Still filing today

78%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureFood & NutritionAnimalsCrime & LegalHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BH
    BERKSHIRE HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $37k · revenue +171%
  • KF
    KCRW FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $31k · revenue +9%
  • II
    IS183 INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $25k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • TE
    THE EMERLING-TORRES FAMILY FOUND DA
    one grant, 2024 · $32k
  • TE
    THE EMERLING-AKF FOUNDATION DAF
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • CP
    CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $12k · revenue -14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Berkshire International Film Festival Corp

The berkshire international film festival (biff) is for filmmakers and film lovers alike to be entertained, educated and inspired. biff seeks to celebrate independent film and to recognize and pay tribute to accomplished artists on both…

Education
2
Trustees of the Berkshire Museum

Bringing people together for experiences that spark creativity and innovative thinking by making inspiring educational connections among art, history, and natural science.

Arts & Culture
3
Berkshire Film and Media Collaborative Inc

The berkshire film and media collaborative (bfmc) creates educational, workforce and production opportunities in the film and media industry as an economic initiative for the western massachusetts region.

—
4
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
5
Southern Vermont Arts Center Inc Po Box 617

As one of New Englands leading visual and performing arts institutions, SVAC's mission is to promote and nurture the arts.

Arts & Culture
6
Boston Center for the Arts Inc

Boston center for the arts (bca) is a not-for-profit performing and visual arts campus that supports working artists to create, perform, and exhibit new works; develops new audiences; and connects the arts to the community.

Arts & Culture
7
Boston Public Market Association Inc

Our mission is to continue to develop and operate a permanent year-round market in boston and to support the farmers, fishers, and entrepreneurs who grow, catch, and produce local food, and to nourish our community with food and…

Public Benefit
8
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
9
Museum of Contemporary Art Santa Barbara

Museum of contemporary art santa barbara (mcasb) seeks to enrich lives and inspire critical thinking through meaningful engagement with the art and ideas of our time. mcasb provides santa barbara and the central coast with exhibitions and…

Arts & Culture
10
Boston Arts Summer Institute Inc
Recreation & Sports
11
Monterey Museum of Art

The monterey museum of art cultivates curiosity in the visual arts and engages community with the diversity of california art - past, present, and future.

Arts & Culture
12
Wallis Annenberg Center for the Performing Arts

Deeply rooted in our local beverly hills community and influenced by cultural change, the wallis annenberg center for the performing arts, a public-private partnership with the city of beverly hills, strives to be a site for the…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kcrw Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Shark Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY: $115,000 · OtherCLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITYTHE EMERLING-TORRES FAMILY FOUND DA: $31,500 · OtherTHE EMERLING-TORRES FAMILY FOUND DAKCRW FOUNDATION INC: $30,500 · OtherKCRW FOUNDATION INCTHE RAPE FOUNDATION: $25,500 · OtherTHE RAPE FOUNDATIONTHE EMERLING-AKF FOUNDATION DAF: $25,000 · OtherTHE EMERLING-AKF FOUNDATION DAFCOMMUNITY ACCESS TO ARTS: $21,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY ACCESS TO ARTSSANTA MONICA-MALIBU EDUCATION FOUND: $13,000 · OtherDONOR ADVISOR FUND: $11,000 · Other+8 more: $17,500 · Other+8 moreIS183 INC: $25,250 · Arts & CultureIS183 INCINNER-CITY ARTS: $24,000 · Arts & CultureINNER-CITY ARTSSITE SANTA FE: $15,000 · Arts & CultureSITE SANTA FEBERKSHIRE MUSIC SCHOOL INC: $9,500 · Arts & CultureBERKSHIRE MUSIC S…+2 more: $3,300 · Arts & CultureBERKSHIRE GROWN INC: $22,750 · Food & NutritionBERKSHIRE G…ROOTS RISING INC: $20,950 · Food & NutritionROOTS RISIN…NEW MEXICO ASSOCIATION OF FOOD BANKS: $5,000 · Food & NutritionNEW MEXICO …+1 more: $500 · Food & NutritionBERKSHIRE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $36,750 · AnimalsSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $15,000 · Crime & LegalSHARK FUND: $12,500 · EducationCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $12,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$290,000Arts & Culture$77,050Food & Nutrition$49,200Animals$36,750Crime & Legal$15,000Education$12,500Recreation & Sports$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBERKSHIRE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $36,750 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetKCRW FOUNDATION INC: $30,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RAPE FOUNDATION: $25,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetIS183 INC: $25,250 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetINNER-CITY ARTS: $24,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBERKSHIRE GROWN INC: $22,750 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetROOTS RISING INC: $20,950 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetSITE SANTA FE: $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHARK FUND: $12,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBERKSHIRE MUSIC SCHOOL INC: $9,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBERKSHIRE HORSEWORKS INC: $5,500 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetNEW MEXICO ASSOCIATION OF FOOD BANKS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWAM THEATRE INC: $1,700 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMUSIC IN COMMON INC: $1,600 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetMALIBU FOUNDATION FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES: $1,250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWESTSIDE FOOD BANK: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BERKSHIRE HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds KCRW FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RAPE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds IS183 INC ↗
  • Who funds INNER-CITY ARTS ↗
  • Who funds BERKSHIRE GROWN INC ↗
  • Who funds ROOTS RISING INC ↗
  • Who funds SITE SANTA FE ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARK FUND ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds BERKSHIRE MUSIC SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds BERKSHIRE HORSEWORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO ASSOCIATION OF FOOD BANKS ↗
  • Who funds WAM THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSIC IN COMMON INC ↗
  • Who funds MALIBU FOUNDATION FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds WESTSIDE FOOD BANK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Feigenbaum Foundation IncMA22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Feigenbaum Foundation Inc · Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc · Lee Bank Foundation Inc · Berkshire Bank Foundation Inc · Price Chopper's Golub Foundation · Berkshire United Way Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Appelbaum-Kahn Foundation Co Connolly Switaj Fogler & Co LLP funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Appelbaum-Kahn Foundation Co Connolly Switaj Fogler & Co LLP. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Berkshire Grown Inc: 66% of income from government
  • Roots Rising Inc: 48% of income from government
  • IS183 Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Wam Theatre Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Berkshire Music School Inc: 8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Appelbaum-Kahn Foundation Co Connolly Switaj Fogler & Co LLP’s filings →

More from the funding graph