Skip to content

West Virginia · Private foundation

Appalachian Stewardship Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$262k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
9
Grants FY2024
7
Organizations funded FY2023
71%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$25,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$50,000
Organizations funded a year
7 to 12
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
4
Total assets, FY2024
$2.3M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 71% of the organizations Appalachian Stewardship Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 69% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $169k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
EnvironmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving9$262k44%
FY20237$244k71%
FY20228$265k50%
FY20218$246k50%
FY20208$261k50%
FY201912$306k33%
FY20189$220k33%
FY201711$212kn/a
99% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$2.0MEducation$18kArts & Culture$5kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Allegheny-Blue Ridge Alliance$185,000723%
Appalachian Mountain Advocates Inc$170,00055%
West Virginia Rivers Coalition Inc$157,50066%
Canaan Valley Institute$148,39142%
Wild Virginia Incorporated$139,500611%
Green Forests Work Inc$110,00026%
Three Rivers Waterkeeper$60,00027%
Solar United Neighbors Inc$50,00020%
Downstream Strategies$50,0001n/a
Friends of the Cheat Inc$40,00012%
Show all 19 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 20 recipients with no EIN on record ($726k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Appalachian Stewardship Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAllegheny-Blue Ridge Alliance: $185,000 over 7y, 23% of budgetAppalachian Mountain Advocates Inc: $170,000 over 5y, 5.3% of budgetWest Virginia Rivers Coalition Inc: $157,500 over 6y, 5.8% of budgetCanaan Valley Institute: $148,391 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetWild Virginia Incorporated: $139,500 over 6y, 11% of budgetGreen Forests Work Inc: $110,000 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetThree Rivers Waterkeeper: $60,000 over 2y, 7.5% of budgetSolar United Neighbors Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFriends of the Cheat Inc: $40,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetOhio River Valley Environmental Coalition: $40,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetThe West Virginia Land Trust Inc: $35,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPotomac Valley Audubon Society Inc: $29,700 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetAppalachian Headwaters Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetWest Virginia Highlands Conservancy Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetFriends of Deckers Creek Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetScience Museum of Western Virginia: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 16.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

PatagoniaorgCA22.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Patagoniaorg · The Dunn Foundation Inc · Rockefeller Family Fund Inc · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Nonprofit Partners Inc · Tortuga Charitable Foundation · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · Common Stream Inc #0745935 · The New World Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · The Heinz Endowments · Charlottesville Area Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Appalachian Stewardship Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Appalachian Stewardship Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Appalachian Stewardship Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Appalachian Stewardship Foundation

How much does Appalachian Stewardship Foundation give?
Appalachian Stewardship Foundation reported 9 grants totaling $262,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 7 and 12 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Appalachian Stewardship Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Environment (96%), Education (1%), Arts & Culture (0%).
Who are Appalachian Stewardship Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Allegheny-Blue Ridge Alliance ($185k), Appalachian Mountain Advocates Inc ($170k), West Virginia Rivers Coalition Inc ($158k).
Does Appalachian Stewardship Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 71% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Appalachian Stewardship Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Appalachian Stewardship Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Patagoniaorg, The Dunn Foundation Inc, Rockefeller Family Fund Inc.
Where is Appalachian Stewardship Foundation based?
Appalachian Stewardship Foundation is based in WV.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Appalachian Stewardship’s filings →

More from the funding graph