· Private foundation
Antioch Foundation 1015002041
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k9 grants · $43k
- $10k–50k38 grants · $900k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $130k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KINGDOM WORKERS | $80,000 |
| INSTITUTIONAL MINISTRIES | $50,000 |
| Christian Family Solutions | $47,024 |
| St Paul Lutheran Church | $45,000 |
| God's Treasures Childcare Learning | $40,000 |
| KINGDOM PREP LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL | $40,000 |
| Gloria Dei Lutheran Church | $40,000 |
| Crown of Life Lutheran Church | $40,000 |
| Risen Savior Lutheran School | $40,000 |
| ST MARCUS LUTHERAN SCHOOL | $40,000 |
| Myriad USA | $31,500 |
| CENTER FOR URBAN TEACHING | $30,000 |
| Footnotes Trauma Foundation | $30,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS - WISCONSIN | $30,000 |
| CROSSWALK LUTHERAN MINISTRIES | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $190k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
70 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2024, 44 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $480k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WEWISCONSIN EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN SYNOD KINGDOM WORKERS INC6× · 2019–2024 · $282k · revenue +122%
- CFCENTER FOR URBAN TEACHING INC4× · 2019–2024 · $120k · revenue +33%
- 3H3HOPEFUL HEARTS4× · 2019–2023 · $120k · revenue +65%
Funded once
- WLWISCONSIN LUTHERAN INSTL MINISTRIESone grant, 2020 · $50k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $50k
- GEGRACE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCHone grant, 2019 · $45k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To share christ's love as we serve the spiritual, physical, intellectual and emotional needs of people entrusted to our care and others whose lives we touch.
To be the love of christ to uganda's orphaned and vulnerable children, equipping them to become authentic godly leaders that transform generations
Mission is to provide women facing an unplanned pregnancy with truthful medical information and education. we are faith-based with a mission to encourage, through education and outreach, the recognition of human life from the moment of…
To provide christian based outreach to clients by providing services and information free of charge to anyone in a crisis pregnancy situation, with the goal of assisting the client to carry the pregnancy to term and with continued care…
To provide learning opportunities, values, and encouragement to children & parents through our early childhood proagram. we serve infants through school-age children in a full day, year round program. our facility uses creative and…
To glorify god, show christian love, and experience god's presence as christians share each other's medical bills.
Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.
Pathways of wisconsin provides supported employment opportunities and empowerment through quality, person-centered programming for individuals of all abilities.
Wisconsin family ties changes lives by improving children's mental health. it accomplishes this mission through a set of interrelated activities that support and educate parents, and inform practitioners, policy makers and the public about…
Churches united in ministry (chum) is people of faith working together to provide basic necessities, foster stable lives and organize for a just and compassionate community.
Operation of childcare centers based on the waldorf teaching method. nurturing children, families, caregivers and communities. lifeways welcomes children and families of any race, religion,
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Wisconsin Inc and the most unlike its peers is Health Poverty Action Usa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
61 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 61 of the 218 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WISCONSIN EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN SYNOD KINGDOM WORKERS INC ↗
- Who funds THE LUTHERAN HOME ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR URBAN TEACHING INC ↗
- Who funds 3HOPEFUL HEARTS ↗
- Who funds TRUTH IN LOVE MINISTRY CORP ↗
- Who funds TIME OF GRACE MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds LIGHTHOUSE YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FOOTNOTES TRAUMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WELS LUTHERANS FOR LIFE METRO MILWAUKEE INC ↗
- Who funds Branch Lutheran Schools of Haiti Inc ↗
- Who funds ADVANCE COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds Chaplains in Schools Inc ↗
- Who funds HEALTHY BIRTH DAY INC ↗
- Who funds THAI VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL SMILE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds CHILEDA INSTITUTE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Siebert Lutheran Foundation Inc · Holzhueter Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · Arvid W & Judy R Schwartz Family Foundation · Stimac Family Foundation · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Neumann Family Foundation Inc · Theodore W Batterman Family Foundation Inc · Church Mutual Insurance Company Foundation Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Antioch Foundation 1015002041 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Addiction Policy Forum — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Antioch Foundation 1015002041?
Find your warmest path to Antioch Foundation 1015002041 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.