Utah · Nonprofit
Center for Genomic Interpretation
Center for Genomic Interpretation (Utah) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $327,869 to it, the largest being GORDON E AND BETTY I MOORE FOUNDATION ($176,400). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- Revenue FY2025
- $17k
- Funders on record
- 5
- Grants received
- $328k
- Net assets
- $-497834
What Center for Genomic Interpretation does
Mission
The mission of the Organization is to build an expertly curated, comprehensive human genetic variant database that, once established, will significantly contribute to the scientific research findings that will be published and made available to the public. Through our work we will identify genetic markers of disease, which is the first step to identifying cures for both hereditary and somatic diseases.
As stated on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ.
Program
The Organization shall, through interactions and outreach with patients, clinicians, genetics laboratories, genetics advocacy groups, academic institutions, and the general public, advance the science and application of genetic variant classification and educate the public on the current scientific status of clinical genetics and the need for improvement in the methods by which clinical genetic diagnoses are determined. Our interaction with the general public through our citizen science efforts, will educate the general population on the science of genetics and genetic variant classification, and will provide a novel and disruptive mechanism toward the classification of genetic variants. Specific activities that will accomplish these ends are the deposit of clinical genetic variant classifications into publicly funded and publicly available database repositories, the transparent publication of variant classification methods and conclusions in peer-reviewed scientific journals, and the involvement of crowdsourcing efforts, all of which will educate the general public and the academic community and increase the awareness of the need for increased quality in clinical genetics.
$61,235 spent100% of program spending
The program described on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $61,235.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $125k to $442k (+253%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2021 23%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
3% of Center for Genomic Interpretation’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (65% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Leadership and staff
The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.
Chief executive
Julie M Eggington
CEO
As listed on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ.
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $11k → $20k.
2 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 4% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of Center for Genomic Interpretation’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
Center for Genomic Interpretation leans on a few funders — its largest provides 54% of grant income and the top three 97%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
Center for Genomic Interpretation draws 68% of its grant income from funders outside Utah, across 3 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $11k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Against its field
Center for Genomic Interpretation's funding base is broadening — from 1 funders to 2 as grant income climbed.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 17,277 education nonprofits under $100k, FY2025
Organizations like Center for Genomic Interpretation
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Utah
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Public support
97%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Center for Genomic Interpretation: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds Center for Genomic Interpretation?
- Center for Genomic Interpretation (Utah) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $327,869 to it, the largest being GORDON E AND BETTY I MOORE FOUNDATION ($176,400). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does Center for Genomic Interpretation have?
- IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $327,869 in grants to Center for Genomic Interpretation, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of Center for Genomic Interpretation?
- GORDON E AND BETTY I MOORE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $176,400 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like Center for Genomic Interpretation find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Utah. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 5 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing