Skip to content
Annunziata Sanguinetti Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Annunziata Sanguinetti Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$242k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$420kHuman Services$360kRecreation & Sports$190kYouth Development$145kPublic Safety & Disaster$80kAnimals$48kEducation$30kPhilanthropy$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $180k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IM$50,000
GIANT STEPS THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTE$30,000
WAYFINDER FAMILY SERVICES$30,000
EDGEWOOD CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIE$20,000
CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE$20,000
BAY AREA FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE$20,000
ALISA ANN RUCH BURN FOUNDATION$20,000
DYF$15,000
POMEROY RECREATION AND REHABILITATION CE$15,000
ENVIRONMENTAL TRAVELING COMPANIONS$10,000
CITY SURF PROJECT INC$6,500
PROJECT COMMOTION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $664k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BAY AREA FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $20k → 8%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $20k → 9%WAYFINDER FAMILY SERVICES: $30k → 14%BAY AREA FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $15k → 8%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $20k → 9%WAYFINDER FAMILY SERVICES: $30k → 14%BAY AREA FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $15k → 8%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $20k → 9%WAYFINDER FAMILY SERVICES: $30k → 14%MAGIC TOOTH BUS: $20k → 10%WAYFINDER FAMILY SERVICES: $26k → 14%WAYFINDER FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 14%WAYFINDER FAMILY SERVICES: $20k → 14%WAYFINDER FAMILY SERVICES: $20k → 14%LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IM: $60k → 10%LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IM: $50k → 10%LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IM: $50k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $20k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $20k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $20k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $20k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $15k → 10%SUPPORT FOR FAMILIES: $25k → 10%POMEROY RECREATION AND REHAB CTR: $20k → 10%POMEROY RECREATION AND REHAB CTR: $15k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $8k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $5k → 10%MAGIC TOOTH BUS: $25k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Annunziata Sanguinetti Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Annunziata Sanguinetti Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 17 repeat orgs$292k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against -27% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
10

Total granted

$1.2M
$220k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
-27%

Still filing today

65%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $72k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentEducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WF
    Wayfinder Family Services
    7× · 2018–2025 · $181k · revenue +62%
  • LF
    LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED
    3× · 2022–2025 · $160k · revenue +198%
  • LS
    Larkin Street Youth Services
    5× · 2018–2023 · $95k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • LF
    LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • GS
    GIANT STEPS THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN
    one grant, 2024 · $30k
  • SF
    Support for Families of Children with Disabilities
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ala Costa Centers a Program for Developmentally Disabled

To provide each student or participant with the access, skills, and opportunities needed to become successful and productive members of society, and to encourage them to have some fun along the way. The Organization offers support and…

—
2
Serra Residential Center Inc

To provide dignity, respect and choice for persons with developmental disabilities

—
3
Achievekids

Achievekids schools provide individualized and multi-disciplinary programs that deliver special education, mental health, and family support services for students ages 5 to 22 who have complex and often severe developmental, emotional, and…

Education
4
East Bay Agency for Children

For more than 70 years, East Bay Agency for Children continues to improve the well-being of children, youth and families by reducing the impact of trauma and social inequalities.

Health
5
Allies for Every Child Inc

All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)

Human Services
6
Marin Ventures

The mission of Marin Ventures is to serve adults with developmental disabilities by fostering independence, personal growth, and promoting the opportunity for community integration based upon individual need.Marin Ventures is an Adult…

Human Services
7
Inclusion Revolution Inc a California Nonprofit Corporation

Camp Revolution provides a safe, fun and motivational overnight outdoor camping experience for differently-abled teens and adults. Our goal is to empower each camper with confidence, boost self-esteem, experience outdoor adventures and…

Human Services
8
Regional Center of the East Bay Inc

Regional Center of the East Bay, Inc. (The "Center"), a California NonProfit Public Benefit Corporation under contract with the state of California Department of Developmental Services ("DDS"), was formed in 1975 to administer programs for…

Human Services
9
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
10
Bayfront Youth and Family Services Inc

Bayfront Youth & Family Services is a quality provider of behavioral and mental health treatment services for children, adolescents, and their caregivers. Our mission is to provide a comprehensive support system that promotes safe and…

Health
11
Children's Council of San Francisco

By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…

Human Services
12
People with Disabilities Succeeding

Community support for Developmentally Disabled Adults, with a main emphasis on helping people to obtain and maintain real jobs in local businesses.

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family and Children's Services; the most unlike its peers is Muscular Dystrophy Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/21
Grantees still filing
12/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Wayfinder Family Services: $181,005 · Human ServicesWayfinder Family ServicesLIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $160,000 · Human ServicesLIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIREDLarkin Street Youth Services: $95,000 · Human ServicesLarkin Street Youth ServicesCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $67,500 · Human ServicesCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INCBAY AREA FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $50,000 · Human ServicesBAY AREA FRIENDSHIP CIRCLEMAGIC TOOTH BUS: $45,000 · Human ServicesMAGIC TOOTH BUSPomeroy Recreation and Rehabilitation Center: $35,000 · Human ServicesSupport for Families of Children with Disabilities: $25,000 · Human Services+1 more: $12,500 · Human ServicesIndividual grant recipient: $115,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKIDPOWER TEENPOWER FULLPOWER INTERNATIONAL: $80,000 · OtherKIDPOWER TEENPOWER FULLPOWER INTERNATIONALEDGEWOOD CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND: $75,000 · OtherEDGEWOOD CENTER FOR CHILDREN ANDLIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY: $70,000 · OtherLIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLYOakes Children's Center: $56,000 · OtherOakes Children's CenterLIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND: $50,000 · OtherLIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND ANDDYF: $50,000 · OtherDYFHEARING AND SPEECH CENTER OF NORTHERN: $35,000 · OtherHEARING AND SPEECH CENTER OF NORTHERNGIANT STEPS THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN: $30,000 · OtherSUPPORT FOR FAMILIES OF CHILDREN: $25,000 · Other+4 more: $65,000 · Other+4 moreALISA ANN RUCH BURN FOUNDATION: $60,000 · HealthALISA ANN …Giant Steps Therapeutic Equestrian Center Inc: $30,000 · HealthGiant Step…Project Commotion: $25,000 · HealthProject Co…EDGEWOOD CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $20,000 · HealthEDGEWOOD C…MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 · HealthEnvironmental Traveling Companions: $40,000 · EnvironmentCHAMP CAMP INC: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentCALIFORNIA SCOTTISH RITE FOUNDATION: $15,000 · EducationCity Surf Project: $6,500 · Recreation & Sports
Human Services$671,005Other$651,000Health$140,000Environment$40,000Youth Development$20,000Education$15,000Recreation & Sports$6,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWayfinder Family Services: $181,005 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $160,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetLarkin Street Youth Services: $95,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetKIDPOWER TEENPOWER FULLPOWER INTERNATIONAL: $80,000 over 5y, 84% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $67,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALISA ANN RUCH BURN FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetOakes Children's Center: $56,000 over 3y, 6.9% of budgetBAY AREA FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $50,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetMAGIC TOOTH BUS: $45,000 over 2y, 39% of budgetEnvironmental Traveling Companions: $40,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetPomeroy Recreation and Rehabilitation Center: $35,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGiant Steps Therapeutic Equestrian Center Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetSupport for Families of Children with Disabilities: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetProject Commotion: $25,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetEDGEWOOD CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHAMP CAMP INC: $20,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetCALIFORNIA SCOTTISH RITE FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHEARING AND SPEECH CENTER OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCity Surf Project: $6,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bothin FoundationSilicon Valley Commun…McNabb FoundationAmerican Endowment Fo…American Online Givin…Network for GoodNational Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Bothin FoundationCA15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bothin Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · McNabb Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Annunziata Sanguinetti Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Annunziata Sanguinetti Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Annunziata Sanguinetti’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home