Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Annunziata Sanguinetti Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$220k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.

Health$420kHuman Services$360kRecreation & Sports$190kYouth Development$145kPublic Safety & Disaster$80kAnimals$48kEducation$30kPhilanthropy$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $170k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND$50,000
GIANT STEPS THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN$30,000
WAYFINDER FAMILY SERVICES$30,000
MAGIC TOOTH BUS$25,000
SUPPORT FOR FAMILIES OF CHILDREN$25,000
ALISA ANN RUCH BURN FOUNDATION$20,000
DYF$15,000
BAY AREA FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE$15,000
ENVIRONMENTAL TRAVELING COMPANIONS$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $544k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BAY AREA FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $15k → 8%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $20k → 9%WAYFINDER FAMILY SERVICES: $30k → 14%BAY AREA FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $15k → 8%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $20k → 9%WAYFINDER FAMILY SERVICES: $30k → 14%WAYFINDER FAMILY SERVICES: $26k → 14%MAGIC TOOTH BUS: $20k → 10%WAYFINDER FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 14%WAYFINDER FAMILY SERVICES: $20k → 14%WAYFINDER FAMILY SERVICES: $20k → 14%LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IM: $60k → 10%LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IM: $50k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $20k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $20k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $20k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $20k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $15k → 10%SUPPORT FOR FAMILIES: $25k → 10%POMEROY RECREATION AND REHAB CTR: $20k → 10%POMEROY RECREATION AND REHAB CTR: $15k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $8k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $5k → 10%MAGIC TOOTH BUS: $25k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Annunziata Sanguinetti Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Annunziata Sanguinetti Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 17 repeat orgs$220k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against -36% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
7

Total granted

$1.1M
$115k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
-36%

Still filing today

65%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $105k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WF
    Wayfinder Family Services
    6× · 2018–2024 · $151k · revenue +62%
  • LF
    LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED
    2× · 2022–2023 · $110k · revenue +198%
  • LS
    Larkin Street Youth Services
    5× · 2018–2023 · $95k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • SF
    Support for Families of Children with Disabilities
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -8%
  • AA
    ALISA ANN RANCH CALIFORNIA BURN
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • CC
    CHAMP CAMP INC
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -37%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Serra Residential Center Inc

To provide dignity, respect and choice for persons with developmental disabilities

—
2
Regional Center of the East Bay Inc

Regional Center of the East Bay, Inc. (The "Center"), a California NonProfit Public Benefit Corporation under contract with the state of California Department of Developmental Services ("DDS"), was formed in 1975 to administer programs for…

Human Services
3
Marin Ventures

The mission of Marin Ventures is to serve adults with developmental disabilities by fostering independence, personal growth, and promoting the opportunity for community integration based upon individual need.Marin Ventures is an Adult…

Human Services
4
Ala Costa Centers a Program for Developmentally Disabled

To provide each student or participant with the access, skills, and opportunities needed to become successful and productive members of society, and to encourage them to have some fun along the way. The Organization offers support and…

—
5
People with Disabilities Succeeding

Community support for Developmentally Disabled Adults, with a main emphasis on helping people to obtain and maintain real jobs in local businesses.

Employment
6
Children's Council of San Francisco

By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…

Human Services
7
Bayfront Youth and Family Services Inc

Bayfront Youth & Family Services is a quality provider of behavioral and mental health treatment services for children, adolescents, and their caregivers. Our mission is to provide a comprehensive support system that promotes safe and…

Health
8
Allies for Every Child Inc

All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)

Human Services
9
San Francisco Senior and Disability Action Dba Senior & Disability Action

Senior & Disability Action educates and mobilizes seniors and people with disabilities to secure individual rights and social justice. We work together to create a city and world in which seniors and people with disabilities can live well…

Unclassified
10
North Bay Developmental Disabilities Services Inc

The purpose of North Bay Regional Center (The "Center") is to assist people with developmental disabilities or at risk for developmental disabilities in the North Bay Area to obtain services and support they need to live as other people…

Human Services
11
California Alliance of Caregivers

California Alliance of Caregivers represents the voices of relative and non-relative caregivers to promote the well-being of children in foster care. California Alliance of Caregivers provides training information support and advocacy for…

Health
12
Inclusion Revolution Inc a California Nonprofit Corporation

Camp Revolution provides a safe, fun and motivational overnight outdoor camping experience for differently-abled teens and adults. Our goal is to empower each camper with confidence, boost self-esteem, experience outdoor adventures and…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family and Children's Services and the most unlike its peers is Muscular Dystrophy Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $115,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKIDPOWER TEENPOWER FULLPOWER INTERNATIONAL — $80,000 · OtherKIDPOWER TEENPOWER FULLPOWER INTERNATIONALEDGEWOOD CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND — $75,000 · OtherEDGEWOOD CENTER FOR CHILDREN ANDLIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY — $70,000 · OtherLIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLYOakes Children's Center — $56,000 · OtherOakes Children's CenterLIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND — $50,000 · OtherLIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND ANDHEARING AND SPEECH CENTER OF NORTHERN — $35,000 · OtherHEARING AND SPEECH CENTER OF NORTHERNDYF — $35,000 · OtherDYFGIANT STEPS THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN — $30,000 · OtherSUPPORT FOR FAMILIES OF CHILDREN — $25,000 · Other+3 more — $50,000 · Other+3 moreWayfinder Family Services — $151,005 · Human ServicesWayfinder Family ServicesLIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED — $110,000 · Human ServicesLIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIREDLarkin Street Youth Services — $95,000 · Human ServicesLarkin Street Youth ServicesCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC — $47,500 · Human ServicesCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INCMAGIC TOOTH BUS — $45,000 · Human ServicesMAGIC TOOTH BUSPomeroy Recreation and Rehabilitation Center — $35,000 · Human ServicesPomeroy Recreation and Rehabilitation CenterBAY AREA FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE — $30,000 · Human ServicesBAY AREA FRIENDSHIP CIRCLESupport for Families of Children with Disabilities — $25,000 · Human Services+1 more — $12,500 · Human ServicesALISA ANN RUCH BURN FOUNDATION — $40,000 · HealthProject Commotion — $20,000 · HealthMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC — $5,000 · HealthEnvironmental Traveling Companions — $30,000 · EnvironmentCHAMP CAMP INC — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentCALIFORNIA SCOTTISH RITE FOUNDATION — $15,000 · Education
Other$621,000Human Services$551,005Health$65,000Environment$30,000Youth Development$20,000Education$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWayfinder Family Services — $151,005 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED — $110,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLarkin Street Youth Services — $95,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetKIDPOWER TEENPOWER FULLPOWER INTERNATIONAL — $80,000 over 5y, 84% of budgetOakes Children's Center — $56,000 over 3y, 6.9% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC — $47,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMAGIC TOOTH BUS — $45,000 over 2y, 39% of budgetALISA ANN RUCH BURN FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetPomeroy Recreation and Rehabilitation Center — $35,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBAY AREA FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE — $30,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetEnvironmental Traveling Companions — $30,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetSupport for Families of Children with Disabilities — $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetProject Commotion — $20,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCHAMP CAMP INC — $20,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetHEARING AND SPEECH CENTER OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA — $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCALIFORNIA SCOTTISH RITE FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES — $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bothin FoundationSilicon Valley Commun…McNabb FoundationAmerican Endowment Fo…American Online Givin…Network for GoodNational Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Bothin FoundationCA15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bothin Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · McNabb Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Annunziata Sanguinetti Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines