How much did ANNABELLE FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 47% of ANNABELLE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2021

justice

2022

girlstech

2023

techurban

2024

power

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,000

Median grant

States reached

$469k

Total assets

Largest grants

STATEN ISLAND GIVING CIRCLE$5,000
STAR LIGHTHOUSE INC$5,000
BROOKLYN BOOK BODEGA$5,000
SIDEWALK SAMARITAN INC$5,000
POWER OF TWO A PROJECT OF THE FUND$5,000
MEET THE WRITERS INC$4,000
DROSTE MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC$2,000
ONE WORLD ONE LOVE NJ$2,000
THE COACHMAN FOUNDATION INC$2,000
GOOD CALL$2,000
READ 718$2,000
A LITTLE FOOD AND COMMUNITY INC$2,000
CITY GROWERS$2,000
BAY RIDGE CARES INC$2,000
POWER OF TWO A PROJECT OF THE FUND$2,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16% — the area typically sits at 10%. 89% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$108k · 21 repeat orgs$124k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +237% since the first grant, against +86% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$108k

$94k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+237%

+86%

Still filing today

76%

38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationArts & CultureFood & NutritionCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SI
STATEN ISLAND GIVING CIRCLE
3× · 2022–2024 · $9k · revenue +144%
BB
BROOKLYN BOOK BODEGA
2× · 2023–2024 · $7k · revenue +358%
EP
EPIC PLAYERS INC
3× · 2021–2023 · $6k · revenue +660%

Funded once

TB
THE BONELLO FOUNDATION
one grant, 2022 · $4k
MA
MYRTLE AVENUE BROOKLYN DMA INC
one grant, 2022 · $2k
AC
AKEAL CHRISTOPHER COMMUNITY CENTER
one grant, 2021 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

826NYC Inc

826NYC, Inc. is a nonprofit organization dedicated to supporting students ages 6-18 with their creative and expository writing skills.

Education

Teach Reach Inspire Build Empower

TRIBE, Inc. empowers Black girls through culturally relevant education, leadership development, mentoring, and wellness programming. Our purpose is to increase access to affirming, community-rooted resources that support academic success,…

Youth Development

Peace Children Academy Inc

Empowering the immigrant communities of brooklyn through specialized educational programs and provide help at the time of need

Human Services

Brooklyn Emerge Inc

Working towards a just and fair brooklyn through oragnizing and mobalizing the immigrant communities at the grass root level

Human Services

Art and Resistance Through Education

Formed as an education organization to benefit the public interest by conducting educational activities that help combat community deterioration, prejudice and discrimination. The organization will fulfill its purpose by bringing…

—

Black Child Development Institute-District of Columbia

Human Services

Dmf Youth Inc

Driven by the vision of an equitable education system for all, the organization partners with title 1 schools and homeless shelters across nyc to deliver free, accessible afterschool and summer programs that leverage dance and sel to…

Arts & Culture

Digital Girl Incorporated

Digital Girl, Inc. is a non-profit organization founded in Brooklyn, NY. DGI is dedicated to empowering the underserved youth of our communities, especially young girls, to pursue studies and careers in STEM (Science, Technology,…

Education

Promoting Access to Specialized Schools in New York City

increasing the diversity of students sitting for the specialized high school admissions test by providing students of color with access to test prep centers/programs and materials.

Education

Bronx Baseball Dreams Inc

—

Blueprint 4 Kids Incorporated

501c3

Human Services

Jbs Lunch and Literacy Outreach

Safe Place for Inner City Youth

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Community Centers Inc and the most unlike its peers is Where Do We Go From Here Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 9 years old; the field is 15. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%1/53

the rest of the field

10%

4,824/48,641

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

41 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

38/41

Grantees still filing

30/41

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$127,000Human Services$36,000Youth Development$22,000Arts & Culture$16,000Education$14,000Philanthropy$9,000Religion$8,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hyde and Watson FoundationNJ23.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Brooklyn Community Foundation · Robin Hood Foundation · Pinkerton Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Herbert and Lillian Heilpern Family · Affinity Legacy Inc · The Lois & Richard Nicotra Foundation · Tiger Baron Foundation Inc · Altman Foundation · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · United Way of New York City

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ANNABELLE FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: START LIGHTHOUSE.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~12 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 4 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 18.8× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 852137528 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on START LIGHTHOUSE, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 12 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 6% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Annabelle Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Annabelle Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ANNABELLE FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

41 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Annabelle Foundation?

More from the funding graph

ANNABELLE FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

41 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Annabelle Foundation?

More from the funding graph