Skip to content
Ann E Onymous Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Ann E Onymous Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$101k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$213kHealth$100kInternational$72kReligion$51kFood & Nutrition$40kHuman Services$38kPublic Safety & Disaster$19kEducation$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $81k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$3,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WSU FOUNDATION VETERINARY TEACHING$10,000
VERDE VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AM$8,000
GENERAL SERVICE BOARD$7,500
NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY$5,000
ST LABRE INDIAN SCHOOL$5,000
SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL$5,000
VERDE VALLEY CAREGIVERS COALITION$5,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$5,000
ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND$5,000
TIGER HAVEN$3,000
COMPASSION AND CHOICES$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
MUTTVILLE$3,000
GRAND CANYON CONSERVANCY$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%KSDS ASSISTANCE DOGS: $5k → 10%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $10k → 11%KSDS ASSISTANCE DOGS: $2k → 10%CHRISTIAN FAMILY CARE AGENCY: $500 → 11%SOLDIER'S BEST FRIEND: $1k → 11%OLD TOWN MISSION: $3k → 14%VERDE VALLEY CAREGIVERS COALITION: $6k → 14%VERDE VALLEY CAREGIVERS COALITION: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
IA
OH
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
TN
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$443k · 29 repeat orgs$153k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
43

Total granted

$443k
$119k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+13%

Still filing today

72%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsInternationalHuman ServicesHealthFood & NutritionReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $36k · revenue +80%
  • AL
    ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $31k · revenue +55%
  • CC
    COMPASSION & CHOICES
    6× · 2017–2025 · $26k · revenue +169%

Funded once

  • Feeding Americagraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +40%
  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIPgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +29%
  • SR
    SNAKE RIVER COMMUNITY CLINIC INC
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue -15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
2
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
3
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
4
Veterinarians Without Borders Usa

Our mission is to strengthen animal health and welfare to build more resilient communities. we do this by enhancing veterinary care, bolstering community disaster response and recovery, championing sustainable livelihoods, and improving…

International
5
Best Friends Animal Society

To bring about a time when there are no more homeless pets. we do this by demonstrating and promoting exemplary animal care and building community programs and partnerships.

Animals
6
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals of Northern Nv

Our mission is to be an innovative regional leader in responsible treatment of homeless dogs and cats, primarily through their rescue and placement in forever loving homes and by promoting spaying and neutering to control pet…

Unclassified
7
World Vets

To improve the health & well-being of animals through veterinary aid, response, training, research & local capacity building worldwide. We provide services to companion animals, horses, street dogs, livestock and marine animals including…

Animals
8
Animal Humane Society

Animal Humane Society (AHS) established in 1878 and incorporated as a nonprofit charitable organization in 1891 works to engage the hearts, hands, and minds of the community to help animals. AHS's vision is to compassionately and…

Animals
9
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Inc

Protection of animal rights

Animals
10
San Diego Humane Society and Spca

Create a more humane world by inspiring compassion, providing hope and advancing the welfare of animals and people.

Animals
11
Humane Society of Southern Arizona

To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.

Animals
12
Humane Society Silicon Valley

At humane society silicon valley, our mission is to save lives, keep families together, and create a better future for pets and their people.(see schedule o for continuation)

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Phoenix Gospel Mission; the most unlike its peers is Old Dog House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
50/50
Grantees still filing
37/50
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WSU FOUNDATION VETERINARY TEACHING: $50,000 · OtherWSU FOUNDATION VETERINARY TEACHINGSALVATION ARMY: $29,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY4 PAWS LLC: $16,500 · Other4 PAWS LLCNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR THE MENTALLY: $12,000 · OtherDELRAY CENTRAL HOUSE FOUNDATION: $9,500 · OtherMACULAR DEGENERATION ASSOCIATION: $9,000 · OtherST LABRE INDIAN SCHOOL: $8,500 · OtherPHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION: $10,000 · Other+34 more: $98,450 · Other+34 moreANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC: $31,000 · AnimalsANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE F…Helping Hands Rescue Inc: $24,000 · AnimalsHelping Hands Rescue I…VERDE VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $20,000 · AnimalsVERDE VALLEY HUMANE SO…INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC: $16,500 · AnimalsINTERNATIONAL FUND FOR…Humane World for Animals Inc: $9,000 · AnimalsHumane World for Anima…OLD DOG HOUSE: $6,500 · AnimalsOLD DOG HOUSEMUTTVILLE: $5,000 · Animals+7 more: $8,620 · Animals+7 moreInternational Rescue Committee INC: $36,000 · InternationalInternational…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $8,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS…Save The Children Federation Inc: $8,000 · InternationalSave The Chil…Mercy Corps: $6,000 · InternationalMercy CorpsMercy Ships International: $5,000 · InternationalMercy Ships I…FINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $4,000 · InternationalFINCA INTERNA…+3 more: $3,000 · InternationalPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $23,000 · HealthPLANNED P…CROSSROADS CLUB INC: $17,500 · HealthCROSSROAD…SNAKE RIVER COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $8,000 · HealthSNAKE RIV…NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $2,000 · Health+3 more: $2,000 · HealthAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $15,000 · Human ServicesAmerican …VERDE VALLEY CAREGIVERS COALITION: $11,000 · Human ServicesVERDE VAL…COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $10,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY…KSDS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesKSDS ASSI…Old Town Mission Inc: $3,000 · Human ServicesOld Town …+2 more: $1,500 · Human ServicesST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $18,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $10,000 · Food & NutritionIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $7,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $1,000 · Food & NutritionCOMPASSION & CHOICES: $26,000 · Civil Rights
Other$242,950Animals$120,620International$70,000Health$52,500Human Services$47,500Food & Nutrition$36,000Civil Rights$26,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $36,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC: $31,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPASSION & CHOICES: $26,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHelping Hands Rescue Inc: $24,000 over 3y, 9.3% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $23,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVERDE VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $18,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSROADS CLUB INC: $17,500 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC: $16,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVERDE VALLEY CAREGIVERS COALITION: $11,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFeeding America: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKSDS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Corps: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUTTVILLE: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDAVE THOMAS FOUNDATION FOR ADOPTION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIGER HAVEN INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHIMP HAVEN INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget100 CLUB OF ARIZONA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPhysicians Committee for Responsible Med: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT STREET VET: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetManzanita Outreach: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN FAMILY CARE AGENCY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGreat Plains Development Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPAW WARRIORS INC: $120 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community Fou…The Albertsons Compan…The Foundation for Co…Petco LoveNetwork for GoodAmerican Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…The Bank of America C…National Philanthropi…Natl Christian Charit…Paypal Charitable Giv…Vanguard Charitable E…
Arizona Community FoundationAZ17.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · Petco Love · Network for Good · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ann E Onymous Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ann E Onymous Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 47%
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 84 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ann E Onymous’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home