Skip to content

· Private foundation

Angelo and Mary Cali Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$197k
Granted FY2025still arriving
39
Grants FY2025still arriving
17
States reached
$64k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$299kHealth$202kInternational$135kEducation$133kScience & Tech$116kEnvironment$92kCivil Rights$86kCrime & Legal$73kOther$0
02FY2025 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k34 grants · $77k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $56k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $64k
$2,000
Median grant
17
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$63,500
MORQUIO COMMUNITY$26,000
CITIZENS COMMISSION OF HUMAN RIGHTS$10,000
NPR$10,000
BRIDGE PUBLICATIONS$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$6,700
INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY$5,000
SUCEED 2GETHER$5,000
National Immigration Law CTR$4,000
THE BAIL PROJECT$4,000
ACLU FOUNDATION$3,300
Dogwood Alliance$3,000
EARTH JUSTICE$3,000
NATIONAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL$3,000
Operation Smile$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SUCEED 2GETHER: $8k → 16%SUCEED 2GETHER: $5k → 16%SUCEED 2GETHER: $5k → 16%SUCEED 2GETHER: $3k → 16%SUCEED 2GETHER: $3k → 16%Community Education Partnerships: $2k → 10%Community Education Partnerships: $2k → 10%SUCEED 2GETHER: $3k → 16%Community Education Partnerships: $1k → 10%NATIONAL URBUAN LEAGUE: $1k → 17%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE: $1k → 17%NATIONAL URBUAN LEAGUE: $1k → 17%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE: $1k → 17%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE: $1k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $4k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $4k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $4k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $3k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $1k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $1k → 17%Covenant House: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
MO
VA
MD
DE
NC
DC
HI
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 54 repeat orgs$98k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

54 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

54
29

Total granted

$1.2M
$79k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+10%

Still filing today

70%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentInternationalHuman ServicesAnimalsFood & NutritionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CITIZENS COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +7%
  • SI
    SUCCEED2GETHER INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $26k · revenue +25%
  • EARTHJUSTICE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $24k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • N
    Nemours
    one grant, 2017 · $21k
  • NP
    National Parks FoundationOther Check
    one grant, 2018 · $7k
  • KC
    KEY COLLEGIATE CHARTER SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue -98%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
3
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
4
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
5
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
6
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
7
Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy

Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.

Food & Nutrition
8
Committee to Protect Journalists Inc

The committee to protect journalists promotes press freedom worldwide and defends the right of journalists to report the news safely and without fear of reprisal. cpj ensures the free flow of news and commentary by taking action wherever…

Civil Rights
9
Third Way

To research and develop centrist policy ideas.

Civil Rights
10
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
11
Federation for American Immigration Reform

The federation for american immigration reform's (fair) mission is to educate the public about the economic, sociological, environmental, demographic and other effects of mass immigration to the united states.

International
12
Namati Inc

Namati, inc. (namati) is dedicated to putting the law in people's hands. we strive to build a just world, in which every one of us can take part in the decisions and demand accountability from the institutions that affect our lives.…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nrdc Action Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is Morquio Community. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

63 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 63 of the 93 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
63/63
Grantees still filing
39/63
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IFOPA: $235,250 · OtherIFOPAIndividual grant recipient: $144,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBRIDGE PUBLICATIONS INC: $65,900 · OtherBRIDGE PUBLICATIONS INCNEMOURS FUND FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $54,050 · OtherNEMOURS FUND FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTHPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $37,850 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR MORRISTOWN MEDCENTER: $35,000 · Other+51 more: $296,850 · Other+51 moreCITIZENS COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS: $90,000 · InternationalCITIZENS COM…PLAN INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $21,506 · InternationalPLAN INTERNA…WORLD VISION INC: $21,494 · InternationalWORLD VISION…A JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE: $7,000 · InternationalMercy Ships International: $6,000 · InternationalOPERATION SMILE INC: $6,000 · International+4 more: $11,000 · International+4 moreMORQUIO COMMUNITY: $115,600 · HealthMORQUIO COM…Foundation for Morristown Medical Center: $23,000 · HealthFoundation …+2 more: $4,000 · HealthTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $75,500 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $8,000 · EducationKEY COLLEGIATE CHARTER SCHOOL: $6,100 · EducationBES INC: $4,400 · EducationPROJECT DRAWDOWN: $4,000 · EducationEARTHJUSTICE: $24,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $19,150 · EnvironmentDogwood Alliance Inc: $10,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentCOALITION FOR RAINFOREST NATIONS SECRETARIAT: $3,750 · Environment350ORG: $3,500 · EnvironmentTHE ALLIANCE FOR CLIMATE PROTECTION: $2,500 · Environment+1 more: $2,000 · EnvironmentSUCCEED2GETHER INC: $25,500 · Human ServicesTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $16,500 · Human ServicesCommunity Education Partnerships: $5,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE: $2,500 · Human ServicesAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $19,800 · Civil RightsNATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER: $7,500 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUSTICE USA INC: $4,500 · Civil Rights+1 more: $500 · Civil Rights
Other$869,200International$163,000Health$142,600Education$98,000Environment$69,900Human Services$54,500Civil Rights$32,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMORQUIO COMMUNITY: $115,600 over 5y, 81% of budgetCITIZENS COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS: $90,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $75,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUCCEED2GETHER INC: $25,500 over 6y, 3.7% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $24,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFoundation for Morristown Medical Center: $23,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPLAN INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $21,506 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $21,494 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $19,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BAIL PROJECT INC: $19,700 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $19,150 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARSHALL PROJECT INC: $19,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $17,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $16,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $15,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSUDBURY VALLEY SCHOOL INC: $14,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $10,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDogwood Alliance Inc: $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSCHOOL OF AMERICAN BALLET INC: $8,600 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $8,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetA JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE: $7,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNRDC ACTION FUND INC: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKEY COLLEGIATE CHARTER SCHOOL: $6,100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMercy Ships International: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKIVA MICROFUNDS: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Education Partnerships: $5,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCritical Resistance: $4,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE USA INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBES INC: $4,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT DRAWDOWN: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOALITION FOR RAINFOREST NATIONS SECRETARIAT: $3,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budget350ORG: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ALLIANCE FOR CLIMATE PROTECTION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAnimal Samaritans: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR MIDDLE EAST PEACE INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Coalition for the Homeless: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetURBAN JUSTICE CENTER: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CORNUCOPIA INSTITUTE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MORQUIO COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds CITIZENS COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds SUCCEED2GETHER INC ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds Foundation for Morristown Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds PLAN INTERNATIONAL USA INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BAIL PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MARSHALL PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds SUDBURY VALLEY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds Dogwood Alliance Inc ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOL OF AMERICAN BALLET INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds A JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE ↗
  • Who funds NRDC ACTION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tides FoundationCA12.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tides Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Angelo and Mary Cali Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Angelo and Mary Cali Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Angelo and Mary Cali Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Angelo and Mary Cali Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 93 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Angelo and Mary Cali Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph