Skip to content
Angelica Foundation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Private foundation

Angelica Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$614kEnvironment$239kCivil Rights$145kInternational$61kArts & Culture$11kPublic Benefit$10kCommunity Improvement$6kHealth$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,534
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THRESHOLD FOUNDATION$3,534
VARIOUS UNDER 1000$160
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 19% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PROTEUS FUND INC: $5k → 12%COUNCIL TO INNOVATE - HISPANICS IN PHILANTHROPY: $25k → 10%TIDES FOUNDATION: $218k → 10%ALLIANCE SAN DIEGO: $5k → 11%COMFYGO: $2k → 14%NORTHEAST VALLEY HEATH CORPORATION: $2k → 14%YANSA: $10k → 6%UKRAINE RELIEF FUND INC: $5k → 13%BORDER NETWORK FOR HUMAN RIGHTS: $20k → 21%WILDEARTH GUARDIANS: $1k → 12%CENTER FOR COMMUNITY CHANGE: $20k → 14%CENTRO DE LOS DERECHOS DEL MIGRANTE INC: $10k → 19%TIDES FOUNDATION: $196k → 10%VIA INTERNATIONAL: $13k → 11%WILDEARTH GUARDIANS: $1k → 12%CENTER FOR CIVIC POLICY: $10k → 14%CENTER FOR COMMUNITY CHANGE: $10k → 14%CENTRO DE LOS DERECHOS DEL MIGRANTE INC: $10k → 19%TIDES FOUNDATION: $125k → 10%NEW MEXICO WILDERNESS ALLIANCE: $10k → 14%CENTER FOR COMMUNITY CHANGE: $10k → 14%CENTRO DE LOS DERECHOS DEL MIGRANTE INC: $10k → 19%THRESHOLD FOUNDATION: $104k → 10%WASHINGTON OFFICE ON LATIN AMERICAN: $10k → 14%THRESHOLD FOUNDATION: $60k → 10%CENTER FOR COMMUNITY CHANGE: $10k → 14%TIDES FOUNDATION: $47k → 10%SOMOS UN PUEBLO UNIDO: $10k → 12%CENTER FOR COMMUNITY CHANGE: $2k → 14%THRESHOLD FOUNDATION: $14k → 10%VARIOUS UNDER 1000: $7k → 12%THRESHOLD FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%ST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $3k → 14%THRESHOLD FOUNDATION: $4k → 10%SANTA FE ART INSTITUTE: $3k → 12%NEW VENTURE FUND: $3k → 14%THRESHOLD FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%SANTA FE ART INSTITUTE: $2k → 12%ASSOCIADOS POR JUSTO (JASS): $4k → 14%ALL SPECIES: $3k → 10%ASSOCIADOS POR JUSTO (JASS): $2k → 14%RAIN FOREST ACTION NETWORK: $5k → 10%ASSOCIADOS POR JUSTO (JASS): $2k → 14%RAIN FOREST ACTION NETWORK: $5k → 10%RAIN FOREST ACTION NETWORK: $5k → 10%GLOBAL EXCHANGE: $20k → 10%GLOBAL EXCHANGE: $6k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
CA
MD
AZ
NM
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 31% of Angelica Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Angelica Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.4% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$348k · 11 repeat orgs$176k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
30

Total granted

$348k
$176k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+19%

Still filing today

82%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEnvironmentHealthArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    THRESHOLD FOUNDATION
    6× · 2018–2024 · $194k · revenue +18%
  • CENTER FOR COMMUNITY CHANGE
    5× · 2017–2023 · $52k · revenue +65%
  • CD
    CENTRO DE LOS DERECHOS DEL MIGRANTE INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $30k · revenue +263%

Funded once

  • CT
    COUNCIL TO INNOVATE - HISPANICS IN PHILANTHROPY
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • BN
    Border Network for Human Rightsgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +85%
  • FI
    FLAGSTAFF INTERNATIONAL RELIEF EFFORT
    one grant, 2022 · $18k · revenue -33%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
2
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
3
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
4
Guernica Centre for InternationalJustice

The Guernica Centre for International Justice represents the interests of victims in national and international legal proceedings, putting in place transnational accountability strategies that seek to maximize the protection of victims'…

International
5
Conservation Voters New Mexico Education Fund

Cvnm education fund is a statewide, nonpartisan nonprofit committed to engaging the people of new mexico in our long-standing shared values of protecting our air, land, water, and the health of our communities. we do this by mobilizing…

Civil Rights
6
Site Santa Fe

Guided by artists, rooted in new mexico, site santa fe celebrates contemporary creative expression.

Arts & Culture
7
Center for International Environmental Law Inc

To investigate, research, write, publish, present conferences and teach with respect to global, regional, transboundary, and comparative environmental issues and to make the findings from such activities available to the general public; to…

International
8
Nature and Culture International

Nature and culture international conserves biologically diverse landscapes in latin america, in concert with local cultures, for the well-being of the planet.

Environment
9
Cuenca Los Ojos

Cuenca los ojos works to preserve and restore the biodiversity of the us/mexican borderlands through land protection, habitat restoration and wildlife reintroduction.

Environment
10
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
11
Water Protector Legal Collective

The water protector legal collective is an indigenous-led legal nonprofit that provides support and advocacy for indigenous peoples and original nations, the earth, and climate justice movements.

Crime & Legal
12
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centro De Los Derechos Del Migrante Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ukraine Relief Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/33
Grantees still filing
22/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TIDES FOUNDATION: $585,960 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATION+2 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyTHRESHOLD FOUNDATION: $194,444 · InternationalTHRESHOLD FOUNDATIONGLOBAL EXCHANGE: $25,500 · InternationalGLOBAL EXCHANGEWASHINGTON OFFICE ON LATIN AMERICA: $10,000 · International+3 more: $7,552 · InternationalCENTRO DE LOS DERECHOS DEL MIGRANTE INC: $30,000 · OtherCENTRO DE LOS DE…COUNCIL TO INNOVATE - HISPANICS IN PHILANTHROPY: $25,000 · OtherCOUNCIL TO INNOV…Border Network for Human Rights: $20,000 · OtherBorder Network f…American Civil Liberties Union of Texas Inc: $10,000 · OtherAmerican Civil L…Individual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant…VARIOUS UNDER 1000: $8,655 · OtherASSOCIADOS POR JUSTO (JASS): $8,000 · OtherSANTA FE ART INSTITUTE INC: $6,050 · OtherCENTER FOR CIVIC POLICY: $10,000 · OtherCENTER FOR CIVIC…SOMOS UN PUEBLO UNIDO: $10,000 · OtherSOMOS UN PUEBLO …+16 more: $28,543 · Other+16 moreCENTER FOR COMMUNITY CHANGE: $51,500 · Community ImprovementRainforest Action Network: $16,250 · EnvironmentYANSA INC: $10,000 · EnvironmentNEW MEXICO WILDERNESS ALLIANCE: $10,000 · EnvironmentSANTA FE WATERSHED ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · EnvironmentNEW VENTURE FUND: $2,500 · Environment+1 more: $500 · EnvironmentFLAGSTAFF INTERNATIONAL RELIEF EFFORT (FIRE): $17,775 · Human ServicesVIA INTERNATIONAL: $13,000 · Arts & CultureEXODUS ENSEMBLE: $1,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $165 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$586,960International$237,496Other$166,248Community Improvement$51,500Environment$44,250Human Services$17,775Arts & Culture$14,165

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $585,960 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHRESHOLD FOUNDATION: $194,444 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetCENTER FOR COMMUNITY CHANGE: $51,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRO DE LOS DERECHOS DEL MIGRANTE INC: $30,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetBorder Network for Human Rights: $20,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetFLAGSTAFF INTERNATIONAL RELIEF EFFORT (FIRE): $17,775 over 1y, 11% of budgetRainforest Action Network: $16,250 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetVIA INTERNATIONAL: $13,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetAmerican Civil Liberties Union of Texas Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYANSA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetCENTER FOR CIVIC POLICY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNEW MEXICO WILDERNESS ALLIANCE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSOMOS UN PUEBLO UNIDO: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWASHINGTON OFFICE ON LATIN AMERICA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSANTA FE ART INSTITUTE INC: $6,050 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetUkraine Relief Fund Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetPROTEUS FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA FE WATERSHED ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $3,333 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWILDEARTH GUARDIANS: $2,850 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,502 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEAST VALLEY HEALTH CORPORATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEXODUS ENSEMBLE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCLIMATE ADVOCATES VOCES UNIDAS: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMP Concerts: $165 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLAS VEGAS JEWISH COMMUNITY INC: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF TSAD KADIMA: $50 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Threshold FoundationAlbuquerque Community…Santa Fe Community Fo…The Ford FoundationAmalgamated Charitabl…Livingry FoundationTides FoundationMarshall L and Perrin…Rockefeller Philanthr…Brindle FoundationNEO Philanthropy IncAmerican Endowment Fo…
Threshold FoundationNY19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Threshold Foundation · Albuquerque Community Foundation · Santa Fe Community Foundation · The Ford Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Livingry Foundation · Tides Foundation · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Brindle Foundation · NEO Philanthropy Inc · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Angelica Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Angelica Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Centro De Los Derechos Del Migrante Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Angelica Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Angelica Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Angelica’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home