· Private foundation
Andrew & Rachel Skeen Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 46% of ANDREW & RACHEL SKEEN FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $105k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $135k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LDS PHILANTHROPIES | $85,000 |
| GHANA MAKE A DIFFERENCE | $50,000 |
| BUILDING BLOCKS IN AFRICA | $40,000 |
| BE HUMANITARIAN | $20,000 |
| LINCOLN ACADEMY INC | $20,000 |
| HOLY SCRIPTURE RESEARCH FOUNDATION DBA AVARIES ANGELS | $15,000 |
| TRIUMPH FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| THE TEARS FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
13 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GMGhana Make a Difference6× · 2020–2025 · $135k · revenue +458%
- BCBELLEVUE COLLEGE FOUNDATION4× · 2020–2023 · $87k · revenue +7%
- TFTriumph Foundation5× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +48%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $20k
- FFAIRone grant, 2022 · $12k
- JDJONATHAN DALE MILLER FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Humanity Share works hand in hand with East African communities to break cycles of poverty and build sustainable, equitable futures.
To raise donations to (i) provide a daily meal in a place of education for children in the world's poorest communities; (ii) occasionally provide relief for those suffering, in any part of the world, as a result of humanitarian crises…
Ama empowers underserved communities to combat vulnerability and poverty and prevent human trafficking. We prioritize prevention through education, skill-building, innovation, and social enterprises to foster resilience, create jobs, and…
To promote and protect human rights in the United States and around the world.
Our Food Production Center will serve as our primary storage production and distribution facility. The coop will aggregate purchase store and distribute farm inputs for members and will act as an integrator collecting the output from…
Through the generous contributions of supporters and in collaboration with a network of education partners, The School Fund provides scholarships to high potential, economically disadvantaged students in developing countries. As a result…
RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.
For the Good partners with communities in rural, disadvantaged regions of Kenya to keep girls in school so they can gain the agency to drive their own lives.
Empowering Lives International (ELI) ignites world changers. We equip families and orphans to crush poverty, embrace Christ, and share their transformation with others through their God-honoring income, their deepening relationship with…
Our objective is to find and promote charitable organizations and causes that encourage the improvement of social and economic conditions in Africa, primarily through education. Our goal is to use education as an agent of change, improve…
To provide loving support for orphaned children, fostering a greater capacity for physical, spiritual, and emotional healing and growth, and deploying the local church to do the same.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tears Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Evergreen Mountain Bike Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BUILDING BLOCKS IN AFRICA ↗
- Who funds Ghana Make a Difference ↗
- Who funds Be Humanitarian ↗
- Who funds BELLEVUE COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Triumph Foundation ↗
- Who funds Lincoln Academy ↗
- Who funds Mountain America Foundation ↗
- Who funds Tears Foundation ↗
- Who funds JONATHAN DALE MILLER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Against Malaria Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871) ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE AGAINST SLAVERY ↗
- Who funds The Other Side Academy ↗
- Who funds Their Story Is Our Story ↗
- Who funds AWAIAULU INC ↗
- Who funds KIVA MICROFUNDS ↗
- Who funds Evergreen Mountain Bike Alliance ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Andrew & Rachel Skeen Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.