Skip to content
Anderson-Rogers Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Anderson-Rogers Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
104
Grants FY2025still arriving
21
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Environment$1.5MHealth$1.1MFood & Nutrition$907kCivil Rights$844kAnimals$609kHuman Services$337kArts & Culture$313kPublic Safety & Disaster$160kOther$0
02FY2025 · 104 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $85k
  • $10k–50k78 grants · $1.3M
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $480k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$15,000
Median grant
21
States reached
$42M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY$250,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$80,000
GROW NYC$50,000
HOLY APOSTLES SOUP KITCHEN$50,000
AMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST$50,000
WILD EARTH ALLIES$50,000
CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER$50,000
NEW ENGLAND WILDLIFE CENTERS$50,000
CITY HARVEST$50,000
RECLAIMED HOPE INITIATIVE$50,000
READ 718$30,000
FEEDMORE WNY FOUNDATION$30,000
HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT$30,000
KNEISEL HALL CHAMBER MUSIC SCHOOL AND FESTIVAL$30,000
BARGEMUSIC$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $434k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PROJECT JUST BECAUSE: $20k → 8%BEAVER INSTITUTE: $15k → 12%COMMUNITY ACCESS TO THE ARTS: $30k → 12%ABORTION LIBERATION FUND OF PA: $10k → 22%AL OTRO LADO: $5k → 11%FEEDMORE WNY FOUNDATION: $30k → 13%FREEDOM GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 16%CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER: $50k → 20%BRONXWORKS: $10k → 28%GEORGIA CAMPAIGN FOR ADOLESCENT POWER & POTENTIAL: $5k → 8%GEORGIA CAMPAIGN FOR ADOLESCENT POWER AND POTENTIAL: $3k → 13%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $3k → 7%BEAVER INSTITUTE: $12k → 12%ABORTION LIBERATION FUND OF PA: $5k → 22%AL OTRO LADO: $5k → 11%KINGSBRIDGE HEIGHTS COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 28%GEORGIA CAMPAIGN FOR ADOLESCENT POWER AND POTENTIAL: $5k → 8%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $500 → 7%CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER: $10k → 20%KINGSBRIDGE HEIGHTS COMMUNITY CENTER: $3k → 28%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $500 → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $250 → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $250 → 7%CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER: $5k → 20%CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER: $5k → 20%CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER: $5k → 20%BRONX BETHANY COMMUNITY CORPORATION: $10k → 28%SHOES THAT FIT: $15k → 14%GREEN CITY FORCE: $10k → 20%SHOES THAT FIT: $8k → 14%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $5k → 20%RED HOOK INITIATIVE: $1k → 20%HUDSON GUILD: $20k → 17%TEENS FOR FOOD JUSTICE: $10k → 17%HUDSON GUILD: $10k → 17%HUDSON GUILD: $10k → 17%HUDSON GUILD: $5k → 17%HUDSON GUILD: $3k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $30k → 17%SEARCH AND CARE: $20k → 17%THE BRIGID ALLIANCE: $6k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED: $15k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
NH
WA
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
RI
CA
UT
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Anderson-Rogers Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 43% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 40%.

Anderson-Rogers Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.3% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.4M · 87 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

87 repeat relationships: 38 still active in FY2025, 49 since wound down; 66 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

87
101

Total granted

$4.4M
$852k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+10%

Still filing today

84%
74%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentAnimalsHuman ServicesHealthCivil RightsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WE
    Wild Earth Allies Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $197k · revenue +100%
  • CO
    COUNCIL ON THE ENVIRONMENT INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $186k · revenue +7%
  • NEW ENGLAND WILDLIFE CENTER INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $151k · revenue +766%

Funded once

  • NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -41%
  • RR
    RYAN RESIDENCY PROGRAM
    one grant, 2022 · $40k
  • CL
    CIVIL LIBERTIES AND PUBLIC POLICY PROGRAM
    one grant, 2021 · $35k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York City Bird Alliance Inc

Nyc bird alliance is a grassroots community that protects wild birds and habitat in the five boroughs, improving the quality of life for all new yorkers.

Environment
2
Natural Areas Conservancy Inc

The natural areas conservancy champions urban natural areas in new york city and across the nation through innovative research, partnerships, and advocacy. we increase the health and resilience of urban forests and wetlands, catalyze…

Environment
3
Avail Nyc

The mission of avail is to empower those facing unintended pregnancy or past abortion with critical support and resources to inform their decisions, build healthy relationships, and promote healing.

Human Services
4
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
5
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
6
New River Abortion Access Fund

New river abortion access fund builds power and provides direct financial and practical support to southwest virginians and appalachians seeking abortion care. we dedicated to ensuring that all people have the autonomy and resources to…

Civil Rights
7
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
8
Birth Control Advocates of New York

Non-profit organization focused on reproductive health education, youth civic engagement, and advocacy related to increasing access to birth control in new york state.

Health
9
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
10
Women's Care Center Inc

Offer life-affirming choices for pregnancy and sexual health.

Health
11
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
12
City Wildlife Inc

The goals of City Wildlife are to rescue sick, orphaned, and injured wild animals and return them to the wild; to promote the enjoyment of and harmonious co-existence with native wildlife; and to protect the District of Columbias wild…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Reproductive Equity Now Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Central Sierra Environmental Resource Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

205 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 205 of the 255 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
44
Early backer (in before they grew)
205/205
Grantees still filing
109/205
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WILDEARTH GUARDIANS: $150,000 · OtherWILDEARTH GUARDIANSCOLLECTIVE POWER FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE: $120,000 · OtherTHE AMERICAN HUMANIST ASSOCIATION: $110,000 · OtherNATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION: $100,000 · OtherCentral Sierra Environmental Resource Center Inc: $95,000 · OtherWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $97,000 · Other+96 more: $1,723,781 · Other+96 moreWild Earth Allies Inc: $197,000 · EnvironmentWild Earth Allie…COUNCIL ON THE ENVIRONMENT INC: $186,000 · EnvironmentCOUNCIL ON THE E…PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY INC: $100,000 · EnvironmentPUBLIC EMPLOYEES…RIVERKEEPER INC: $75,000 · EnvironmentRIVERKEEPER INCNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC: $50,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL NETWORK…FRIENDS OF BELLPORT BAY INC: $40,000 · EnvironmentACCESS REPRODUCTIVE CARE - SOUTHEAST: $35,176 · Environment+17 more: $190,475 · Environment+17 moreWHOLE WOMAN'S HEALTH ALLIANCE: $152,500 · HealthWHOLE WOMAN'S…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $150,000 · HealthPLANNED PAREN…Women's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project: $125,000 · HealthWomen's Repro…REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH ACCESS PROJECT INC: $90,000 · HealthREPRODUCTIVE …RECLAIMED HOPE INITIATIVE: $50,000 · HealthRECLAIMED HOP…Trust Women Foundation Inc: $35,000 · HealthOUR JUSTICE: $30,000 · Health+7 more: $72,250 · Health+7 moreNEW ENGLAND WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $151,000 · AnimalsNEW ENGLAND …CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC: $130,000 · AnimalsCENTER FOR B…WILD BIRD FUND INC: $70,170 · AnimalsWILD BIRD FU…WILDLIFE ALLIANCE INC: $65,000 · AnimalsWILDLIFE ALL…CATS IN NEED OF HUMAN CARE: $32,600 · AnimalsMARINE MAMMAL CARE CENTER LOS ANGELES: $30,000 · AnimalsPOLAR BEARS INTERNATIONAL: $25,000 · Animals+13 more: $152,600 · Animals+13 moreRewire News Group: $140,000 · Civil RightsRewire New…NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH INC: $80,000 · Civil RightsNATIONAL I…VOTERIDERS: $72,500 · Civil RightsVOTERIDERSMIDWEST ACCESS COALITION: $60,000 · Civil RightsMIDWEST AC…PREGNANCY JUSTICE INC: $60,000 · Civil RightsPREGNANCY …THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $45,000 · Civil RightsTHE CENTER…PROVIDE INC: $25,000 · Civil RightsGender Equity Policy Institute: $25,000 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $20,300 · Civil Rights+5 more: $30,276 · Civil Rights+5 moreTHE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER INC: $75,000 · Human ServicesTHE CAMPA…HUDSON GUILDINC: $48,000 · Human ServicesHUDSON GU…DC ABORTION FUND: $43,000 · Human ServicesDC ABORTI…HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $30,000 · Human ServicesHENRY STR…COMMUNITY ACCESS TO THE ARTS INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY…FEEDMORE WNY FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesFEEDMORE …Beaver Institute Inc: $27,000 · Human ServicesBeaver In…SHOES THAT FIT: $22,500 · Human ServicesSEARCH AND CARE INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesProject Just Because Inc: $20,000 · Human Services+14 more: $144,222 · Human Services+14 moreFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $394,000 · Community ImprovementSTREET LAB INC: $25,000 · Community Improvement
Other$2,395,781Environment$873,651Health$704,750Animals$656,370Civil Rights$558,076Human Services$489,722Community Improvement$419,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $394,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWild Earth Allies Inc: $197,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetCOUNCIL ON THE ENVIRONMENT INC: $186,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetWHOLE WOMAN'S HEALTH ALLIANCE: $152,500 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetNEW ENGLAND WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $151,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetWILDEARTH GUARDIANS: $150,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRewire News Group: $140,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC: $130,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWomen's Reproductive Rights Assistance Project: $125,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetTHE AMERICAN HUMANIST ASSOCIATION: $110,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetPUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY INC: $100,000 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $97,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Sierra Environmental Resource Center Inc: $95,000 over 4y, 10% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE HEALTH ACCESS PROJECT INC: $90,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH INC: $80,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER INC: $75,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetRIVERKEEPER INC: $75,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetVOTERIDERS: $72,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetWILD BIRD FUND INC: $70,170 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetREAD 718 INC: $70,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetWILDLIFE ALLIANCE INC: $65,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMIDWEST ACCESS COALITION: $60,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetPREGNANCY JUSTICE INC: $60,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRECLAIMED HOPE INITIATIVE: $50,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetHUDSON GUILDINC: $48,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $45,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBARGEMUSIC LTD: $45,000 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetDC ABORTION FUND: $43,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetNEIGHBORS TOGETHER CORPORATION: $42,500 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF BELLPORT BAY INC: $40,000 over 5y, 17% of budgetNATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION: $40,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetACCESS REPRODUCTIVE CARE - SOUTHEAST: $35,176 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTrust Women Foundation Inc: $35,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCATS IN NEED OF HUMAN CARE: $32,600 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $31,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Food Advocates Inc: $30,225 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOUR JUSTICE: $30,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetMARINE MAMMAL CARE CENTER LOS ANGELES: $30,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFEEDMORE WNY FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN: $27,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBeaver Institute Inc: $27,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPOLAR BEARS INTERNATIONAL: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPROVIDE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Network of A…Hopewell FundThe Susan Thompson Bu…Women Donors NetworkThe New York Communit…The Prentice Foundati…The Hyde and Watson F…The Oak Hill FundPatagoniaorgThe Educational Found…Lily Auchincloss Foun…Amalgamated Charitabl…
National Network of Abortion Funds IncOR56.7× affinity25 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Network of Abortion Funds Inc · Hopewell Fund · The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation · Women Donors Network · The New York Community Trust · The Prentice Foundation Inc · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The Oak Hill Fund · Patagoniaorg · The Educational Foundation of America · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Anderson-Rogers Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Anderson-Rogers Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Feeding Florida Inc: 32% of income from government
  • Marine Mammal Stranding Center: 10% of income from government
  • Upstream Usa Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Community Access to the Arts Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Beacon Academy Inc: 1% of income from government
  • New England Wildlife Center Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Project Just Because Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Ridge and Valley Conservancy Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
67report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Anderson-Rogers Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Anderson-Rogers Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 255 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Anderson-Rogers’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home