Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Anderson Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$29k
Granted FY2024still arriving
24
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$105kHealth$54kHuman Services$24kPhilanthropy$13kHousing & Shelter$11kRecreation & Sports$6kArts & Culture$5kFood & Nutrition$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$351k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST FRANCIS HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
UNITED WAY OF LAKE COUNTY$3,000
COCHISE COLLEGE FOUNDATION$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE$2,000
CROSSROADS HEALTH$2,000
CORNERSTONE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY$2,000
CONOR J CASEY FOUNDATION$1,500
LAKE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING$1,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$1,000
LIFE ACT$1,000
PROJECT HOPE$1,000
GILMOUR ACADEMY$800
WESTERN RESERVE JUNIOR SERVICE LEAGUE$685
ALS ASSOC NORTHERN OHIO CHAPTER$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PROJECT HOME INC: $1k → 22%PROJECT HOME INC: $1k → 22%CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF NAPLES: $500 → 10%CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF NAPLES: $300 → 10%CHAUTAUQUA HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE: $200 → 18%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $2k → 17%Hospice of the Western Reserve: $2k → 17%AVOW HOSPICE: $100 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
OH
PA
CA
AZ
TN
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$190k · 27 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

27 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
29

Total granted

$190k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+13%

Still filing today

59%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationInternationalPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CORNERSTONE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $20k · revenue +41%
  • L
    LIFEACT
    8× · 2017–2024 · $14k · revenue +76%
  • CH
    CROSSROADS HEALTH
    5× · 2020–2024 · $9k · revenue +224%

Funded once

  • ES
    Ellicottville Skatepark Project
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $4k
  • CS
    CHICAGO STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2019 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
2
Lakeshore Community Health Care Inc

Lakeshore community health care provides access to comprehensive, integrated health care, regardless of ability to pay, eliminating health disparities among the underserved.

Health
3
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
4
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
5
Community Care Health Plan Inc

Community care health plan's mission is to develop and demonstrate innovative, flexible, community-based approaches to care for at-risk adults, in order to optimize their quality of life and optimize the allocation of community resources.

Health
6
Authoracare Collective

Authoracare collective empowers people to be active participants in their care journey, enabling them to live on their own terms through personalized support for mind, body, and spirit.

Human Services
7
The Laurence School

Laurence endeavors to develop the unique abilities and potential of each of its students in a diverse, inclusive and supportive learning community, where rich traditions and an innovative curriculum foster educational excellence and joy in…

Education
8
The College of Wooster

The college of wooster is a community of independent minds, working together to prepare students to become leaders of character and influence in an interdependent global community. (continued on schedule o)we engage motivated students in a…

Education
9
Caromont Health

To provide compassionate, exceptional and highly reliable care.

Health
10
Children's Hospital Medical Center of Akron

To improve the health of children, teenagers and young adults through excellence in patient care, education, research, advocacy and community partnerships.

Health
11
Salem Health Hospitals & Clinics

To support salem health, salem health west valley and related organizations.

12
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crossroads Health and the most unlike its peers is Dogs Unlimited Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyUnited Way FederationsHospice Care ServicesSenior Support ServicesCommunity Arts OrganizationsDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Land Conservation Organizat…Public University Foundatio…Animal Rescue and AdoptionVeteran Support ServicesDevelopmental Disabilities …Cancer Support OrganizationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community Health CentersIndependent K-8 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%3%<5yr12%0%5–10yr21%9%10–20yr14%26%20–35yr16%40%35–55yr20%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%2%<5yr12%0%5–10yr21%2%10–20yr14%26%20–35yr16%27%35–55yr20%42%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/38
the rest of the field
11%
8,037/74,268

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/34
Grantees still filing
23/34
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GILMOUR ACADEMY INC — $51,300 · OtherGILMOUR ACADEMY INCUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS — $10,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY HOSPITALSTHE SALVATION ARMY — $8,100 · OtherPROJECT HOME INC — $8,000 · OtherHOSPICE OF WESTERN RESERVE — $7,200 · OtherCLOTHE A CHILD — $7,000 · OtherST FRANCIS HIGH SCHOOL — $6,000 · Other+37 more — $55,970 · Other+37 moreCORNERSTONE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY — $19,500 · EducationCORNERSTONE C…COCHISE COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $4,500 · EducationCOCHISE COLLE…LAKE ERIE COLLEGE — $3,500 · EducationLAKE ERIE COL…HOPE RIDGE PRESCHOOL INC — $1,000 · Education+1 more — $100 · EducationLIFEACT — $14,000 · HealthLIFEACTCROSSROADS HEALTH — $8,500 · HealthCROSSROADS HE…NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC — $2,000 · HealthNEIGHBORHOOD …REPLAY FOR KIDS — $1,500 · HealthREPLAY FOR KI…+4 more — $1,400 · HealthUNITED WAY OF LAKE COUNTY INC — $12,000 · PhilanthropyHOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC — $4,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT HOME — $2,000 · Human ServicesCHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF NAPLES INC — $1,975 · Human Services+2 more — $300 · Human ServicesCONOR J CASEY FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 · Food & NutritionEPIC FOUNDATION INC — $1,500 · InternationalPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · International
Other$153,570Education$28,600Health$27,400Philanthropy$12,000Human Services$8,275Food & Nutrition$3,000International$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCORNERSTONE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY — $19,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLIFEACT — $14,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF LAKE COUNTY INC — $12,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCROSSROADS HEALTH — $8,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFIELDSTONE FARM THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER — $5,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCOCHISE COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC — $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE ERIE COLLEGE — $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCONOR J CASEY FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetHERSHEY MONTESSORI SCHOOL — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT HOME — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBAYARTS — $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWOMENSAFE INC — $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF NAPLES INC — $1,975 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetREPLAY FOR KIDS — $1,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetEPIC FOUNDATION INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHAUTAUQUA LAKE ASSOCIATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN RESERVE JUNIOR SERVICE LEAGUE — $870 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ALS ASSOCIATION NORTHERN OHIO CHAPTER — $500 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetANGELS UNDERCOVER OF COLLIER COUNTY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMDRC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOB MCCARTHY FOUNDATION — $250 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCHAUTAUQUA HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILESTONES AUTISM RESOURCES — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAVOW Hospice Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CORNERSTONE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY
  • Who funds LIFEACT
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF LAKE COUNTY INC
  • Who funds CROSSROADS HEALTH
  • Who funds FIELDSTONE FARM THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER
  • Who funds COCHISE COLLEGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC
  • Who funds LAKE COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC
  • Who funds LAKE ERIE COLLEGE
  • Who funds CONOR J CASEY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds HERSHEY MONTESSORI SCHOOL
  • Who funds PROJECT HOME
  • Who funds BAYARTS
  • Who funds WOMENSAFE INC
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC
  • Who funds CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF NAPLES INC
  • Who funds REPLAY FOR KIDS
  • Who funds EPIC FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY
  • Who funds CHAUTAUQUA LAKE ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds DOGS UNLIMITED RESCUE INC
  • Who funds HOPE RIDGE PRESCHOOL INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cleveland FoundationOH35.7× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Corinne L Dodero Foundation for the Arts and Sciences · The Swagelok Foundation · Barnard Family Foundation Elaine T Barnard Trustee · The Rig III Family Foundation · Jerome T Osborne and Georgeanne S Osborne Charitable Trust · The Helen F & Louis Stolier Family Foundation · The Sam J Frankino Foundation · Triple T Foundation · The Reinberger Foundation · The Lozick Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Anderson Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 3%
  • Christ Child Society of Naples Inc3% of income from government
  • Avow Hospice Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Anderson Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Anderson Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph