Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Anantaa-Om Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
37
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Education$3.6MReligion$1.1MEnvironment$843kCommunity Improvement$768kPhilanthropy$765kInternational$648kHealth$290kYouth Development$255kOther$0
02FY2024 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k21 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $114k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $565k
  • $250k+2 grants · $550k
$5,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE NUDGE FOUNDATION$300,000
ROCKET LEARNING FOUNDATION$250,000
ADIRONDACK NORTH COUNTRY ASSOCIATION$135,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREENWICH INC$125,000
STATES UNITED TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE$100,000
CIVIC INFLUENCERS INC$100,000
MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY$55,000
BACKCOUNTRY CONCERTS INC$50,000
ADIRONDACK FOUNDATION$25,000
BRYN MAWR COLLEGE$20,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND INC$15,000
NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY$13,500
CROSSROADS FUND$10,000
WNET$10,000
BLUSEED STUDIOS INC$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $168k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 19% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GIVE FOUNDATION INC: $50k → 9%BRIGID PROJECT INC: $3k → 14%DON BOSCO COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 15%LIFEWIRE: $1k → 9%MERCY CHEFS INC: $5k → 20%HOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD: $5k → 17%MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $50k → 9%FILLING IN THE BLANKS INC: $3k → 9%FILLING IN THE BLANKS INC: $3k → 9%HOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD: $5k → 17%HOT BREAD KITCHEN: $5k → 17%CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTERS OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC: $5k → 9%CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTERS OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC: $4k → 9%BUILDING ONE COMMUNITY CORP: $3k → 9%BUILDING ONE COMMUNITY CORP: $3k → 9%YMCA GREENWICH CONNECTICUT INC: $5k → 9%YWCA GREENWICH CONNECTICUT INC: $5k → 9%YWCA GREENWICH CONNECTICUT INC: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
WA
MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
NC
DC
OK
LA
AL
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.3M · 41 repeat orgs$2.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

41 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
83

Total granted

$6.3M
$1.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+25%

Still filing today

90%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $684k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’23’24
EducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesArts & CultureCivil RightsHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PU
    PRATHAM USA
    4× · 2017–2023 · $1.4M · revenue +20%
  • RT
    ROOM TO READ
    5× · 2017–2023 · $822k · revenue +23%
  • MO
    MONGABAY ORG CORP
    5× · 2017–2023 · $775k · revenue +396%

Funded once

  • AI
    ANTARA INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue -81%
  • II
    IFRE INC ASHOKA UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $228k
  • GV
    GREEN VILLAGE INITIATIVE INC
    one grant, 2019 · $110k · revenue -50%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
5
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
6
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
7
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
8
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
9
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
10
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
11
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
12
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Institute for Reproductive Health Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rocket Learning Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Women & Girls Leadership De…Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Local History MuseumsYouth Sports ProgramsChristian Missionary Organi…Pregnancy Support ServicesLgbtq+ Community SupportFood Banks and PantriesPolicy Research and AdvocacyHealth Access Advocacy and …Domestic Violence ServicesCommunity FoundationsLocal Food System Organizat…Community FoundationsEnvironmental Conservation …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%28%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%3%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%39%20–35yr13%10%35–55yr16%20%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/116
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,449

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

110 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 110 of the 144 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
110/110
Grantees still filing
77/110
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PRATHAM USA — $1,400,000 · PhilanthropyPRATHAM USANATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $500,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TR…FFWD — $100,000 · Philanthropy+7 more — $55,220 · PhilanthropySELF-REALIZATION FELLOWSHIP CHURCH — $663,000 · OtherSELF-REALIZATION FELLOWSHIP CHURCHSELF REALIZATION FELLOWSHIP — $418,000 · OtherSELF REALIZATION FELLOWSHIPIFRE INC ASHOKA UNIVERSITY — $228,000 · OtherIFRE INC ASHOKA UNIVERSITYMASTERS SCHOOL — $114,025 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREENWICH — $225,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREENWICHCIVIC INFLUENCERS INC — $125,000 · OtherSTATES UNITED TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENC CO GPEC-ICHV — $100,000 · OtherCT Against Gun Violence Education Fund Inc — $98,000 · Other+74 more — $947,168 · Other+74 moreROOM TO READ — $822,487 · EducationROOM TO READRocket Learning Foundation — $250,000 · EducationRocket Learning Found…MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY — $165,000 · EducationMUSKINGUM UNIVERSITYINTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR SOCIAL IMPACT INC — $145,000 · EducationINTERNATIONAL FOUNDAT…BRYN MAWR COLLEGE — $90,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $74,000 · Education+13 more — $189,056 · Education+13 moreADIRONDACK NORTH COUNTRY ASSOCIATION INC — $735,000 · Food & NutritionADIRONDACK …GREEN VILLAGE INITIATIVE INC — $110,000 · Food & NutritionGREEN VILLA…+5 more — $55,500 · Food & Nutrition+5 moreMONGABAY ORG CORP — $775,000 · EnvironmentMONGABAY O…CONNECTICUT AUDUBON SOCIETY INC — $50,000 · EnvironmentCONNECTICU…ISLAND CONSERVATION — $30,000 · Environment+9 more — $23,700 · EnvironmentANTARA INTERNATIONAL INC — $250,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND INC — $76,005 · HealthANSWER ALS — $50,000 · HealthGLOBAL FOUNDATION FOR HUMANITY — $17,500 · Health+3 more — $11,965 · HealthThe Nudge Foundation — $300,000 · InternationalDASRA — $50,000 · International+5 more — $10,000 · International
Philanthropy$2,055,220Other$2,918,193Education$1,735,543Food & Nutrition$900,500Environment$878,700Health$405,470International$360,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPRATHAM USA — $1,400,000 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetROOM TO READ — $822,487 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetMONGABAY ORG CORP — $775,000 over 5y, 7.6% of budgetADIRONDACK NORTH COUNTRY ASSOCIATION INC — $735,000 over 4y, 26% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $500,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Nudge Foundation — $300,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetRocket Learning Foundation — $250,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetANTARA INTERNATIONAL INC — $250,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREENWICH — $225,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetMUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY — $165,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR SOCIAL IMPACT INC — $145,000 over 2y, 9.0% of budgetCIVIC INFLUENCERS INC — $125,000 over 2y, 8.7% of budgetMASTERS SCHOOL — $114,025 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSTATES UNITED TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENC CO GPEC-ICHV — $100,000 over 1y, 73% of budgetFFWD — $100,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCT Against Gun Violence Education Fund Inc — $98,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetBRYN MAWR COLLEGE — $90,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBACKCOUNTRY CONCERTS INC dba BACKCOUNTRY JAZZ — $77,500 over 3y, 17% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND INC — $76,005 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMUSEUM OF ART & PHOTOGRAPHY FOUNDATION INC — $75,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $74,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBlossom Hill Foundation Inc — $60,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetDASRA — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetANSWER ALS — $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCONNECTICUT AUDUBON SOCIETY INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGIVE FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetADIRONDACK FOUNDATION — $44,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetHIGH MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE INC — $35,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISLAND CONSERVATION — $30,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetStone Barns Restoration Corp DBA Stone Barns Center for Food & Agri — $25,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK SKI EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHomestead Development Corporation — $25,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetKENYON COLLEGE — $20,856 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSLOW FOOD USA INC — $20,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetWNET — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWICH TOWN PARTY INC — $18,400 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGLOBAL FOUNDATION FOR HUMANITY — $17,500 over 2y, 17% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD — $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYWCA GREENWICH CONNECTICUT INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC — $10,075 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN COLLEGE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPublic Health Institute — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fairfield County's Co…The Goldman Sachs Cha…ImpactassetsincAdirondack FoundationGs Donor Advised Phil…Silicon Valley Commun…The Ayco Charitable F…Jewish Communal FundGe Aerospace Foundati…Cloudsplitter Foundat…The Pitney Bowes Foun…The David and Lucile …
Fairfield County's Community Foundation IncCT27.2× affinity12 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Impactassetsinc · Adirondack Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Cloudsplitter Foundation · The Pitney Bowes Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Anantaa-Om Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 180%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Ari of Connecticut Inc — 89% of income from government
  • Kids in Crisis Inc — 49% of income from government
  • Women's Business Development Council Inc — 39% of income from government
  • Children's Learning Centers of Fairfield County Inc — 36% of income from government
  • Green Village Initiative Inc — 14% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of Southern New England Inc — 10% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Club of Greenwich — 7% of income from government
  • Person to Person Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Connecticut Public Broadcasting Inc — 3% of income from government
  • India Cultural Center of Greenwich Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Connecticut Audubon Society Inc — 1% of income from government
  • The Stamford Hospital — 0% of income from government
  • Ceres Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Bennington College Corporation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
18get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Anantaa-Om Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Anantaa-Om Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 144 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home