· Private foundation
Anahata Foundation Xxxxx5004
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k2 grants · $39k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $920k
- $250k+13 grants · $7.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE NATURE CONSERVANCY | $2,000,000 |
| FIDELCO GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION INC | $1,000,000 |
| FRENCHMAN BAY CONSERVANCY | $750,000 |
| VERMONT ADAPTIVE SKI AND SPORTS | $600,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500,000 |
| FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY | $500,000 |
| HARLEM GROWN | $500,000 |
| GLYNWOOD CENTER | $305,000 |
| OPERA HOUSE ARTS | $300,000 |
| PACIFIC MAMMAL MARINE CENTER | $300,000 |
| BROOKLYN TO ALASKA PROJECT | $250,000 |
| DEER ISLE FIREMAN ASSOCIATION | $250,000 |
| FIRST DESCENTS | $250,000 |
| WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY MOTOR CITY | $200,000 |
| BE A FRIEND PROJECT | $150,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $2.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +66% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
33 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $589k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY5× · 2020–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +20%- FGFIDELCO GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION INC6× · 2019–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +51% · 28% of their budget
- GCGLYNWOOD CENTER INC4× · 2020–2024 · $2.0M · revenue ×14
Funded once
- ISICAHN SCHOOL OF MOUNT SINAIone grant, 2020 · $1.0M
- CWCLIMATE WORKSone grant, 2020 · $500k
- CUCOLUMBIA UNIVERSITY MAILMANone grant, 2020 · $300k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The adirondack council ensures the ecological integrity (clean water and air, wildlife habitat, etc.), wild character (solitude, scenic beauty, etc.), and vibrant communities of new york's six-million-acre adirondack park. the adirondack…
Dutchess land conservancy (dlc) is dedicated to preserving the scenic, agricultural and environmental resources of dutchess county, new york, and the surrounding area. dlc, as a private non-profit land conservation organization, carries…
To conserve and steward long island's natural and historic lands, waters and environmental resources. through education, outreach and volunteerism, we connect people to nature and inspire a community conservation ethic.
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
The governors island corporation, doing business as the trust for governors island, is the 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization created by the city of new york and charged with the planning, redevelopment and ongoing operations of 150…
The mission of the new canaan land trust is to foster a connection between the new canaan community and its natural resources through the conservation and sustainable stewardship of our open space.
The wildlands trust works throughout southeastern massachusetts to conserve and permanently protect native habitats, farmland, and lands of high ecologic and scenic value that serve to keep our communities healthy and our residents…
See schedule onylcv is a non-partisan policy making and political action organization that works to make environmental protection a top priority with elected officials, decision-makers and the voters by evaluating incumbent performance and…
The mission of the mount desert land & garden preserve is to conserve and share the beauty of our historic lands and gardens.
The Greenbelt Conservancy (the "Greenbelt"), the second of New York City's Flagship Parks, consists of over 2,800 acres of public and privatge land (greater than the combined acreage of Central Park and Prospect Park) in the center of…
Brooklyn bridge park corporation's mission, d/b/a brooklyn bridge park ("bbp") mission is to provide an exceptional public space that connects people, nature, and the waterfront, through inclusive, innovative, and sustainable management…
Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Blue Hill Heritage Trust and the most unlike its peers is Grace Farms Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
- Who funds FIDELCO GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GLYNWOOD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HARLEM GROWN INC ↗
- Who funds BLUE HILL HERITAGE TRUST ↗
- Who funds Frenchman Bay Conservancy ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds BE A FRIEND PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds VERMONT ADAPTIVE SKI AND SPORTS ↗
- Who funds Natural Resources Council of Maine Inc ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE SEA LIONS INC DBA PACIFIC MARINE MAMMAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds OPERA HOUSE ARTS ↗
- Who funds NGLCC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BROOKLYN TO ALASKA PROJECT ↗
- Who funds FIRST DESCENTS ↗
- Who funds COMMON THREADS ↗
- Who funds BLUE HILL PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds ISLAND HERITAGE TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds RIVERSIDE PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds PHILIPSTOWN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH HUB INC ↗
- Who funds ZERO FOODPRINT ↗
- Who funds Hudson Highlands Land Trust Inc ↗
- Who funds DEER ISLE FIREMANS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Maine Coast Heritage Trust ↗
- Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LGBTQ Victory Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds America Votes ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Maine Community Foundation Inc · Onion Foundation · The San Diego Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Anahata Foundation Xxxxx5004 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Vermont Adaptive Ski and Sports — 11% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Anahata Foundation Xxxxx5004?
Find your warmest path to Anahata Foundation Xxxxx5004 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.