Skip to content
Anabi Family Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Anabi Family Foundation

To provide support to christian ministries focused on health, wellness, and restoration; children's welfare organizations focused on the educational, health, or spiritual needs of children, and organizations focused on providing necessities to people and animals.

$192k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$970kEducation$116kHealth$86kInternational$81kHuman Services$40kPhilanthropy$35k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $175,275, the rows itemized in this filing. The $191,686 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $16,411 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $125k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SIMON FOUNDATION INC$50,000
LOS ANGELES RAMS FOUNDATION$26,100
ST ANNE CATHOLIC CHURCH$24,000
OUR LADY OF THE ASSUMPTION CATHOLIC CHURCH$20,175
HAROLD & CAROLE PUMP FOUNDATION$15,000
AID VILLAGE CHILDREN AFRICA$10,000
ST JOSEPH AACC$10,000
WENTE FOUNDATION FOR ARTS EDUCATION$10,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PROJECT 150: $10k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $10k → 13%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $10k → 13%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF S NEVAD: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 11 repeat orgs$201k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
10

Total granted

$1.1M
$150k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+29%

Still filing today

27%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $51k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AV
    AID VILLAGE CHILDREN AFRICA
    6× · 2018–2024 · $81k · revenue +44% · 63% of their budget
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA
    3× · 2019–2024 · $30k · revenue +123%
  • TR
    THE RENAISSANCE LEARNING CENTER INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $27k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • TW
    THE WEBB SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2018 · $37k · revenue +16%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $36k · revenue +29%
  • TS
    THE SENSORY-COGNITIVE FOUNDATION FOR LEARNING INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $26k · revenue +57% · 43% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Catholic Education Foundation
Education
2
Ronald M Simon Family Foundation
Education
3
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
4
The Ralph Lauren Corporate Foundation
Philanthropy
5
The Academy of Art University Foundation
Human Services
6
Paul Lauzier Scholarship Foundation
Unclassified
7
Chamberlin Education Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Lucas Cup Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Abraham and Lillian Rosenberg Foundation
—
10
Schumacher Foundation
—
11
The Charles R Bronfman Prize Foundation
Philanthropy
12
The David Robinson Foundation
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Community Foundation of Los Angeles; the most unlike its peers is Fast Fade. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OUR LADY OF THE ASSUMPTION: $503,562 · OtherOUR LADY OF THE ASSUMPTIONST ANNE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $156,729 · OtherST ANNE CATHOLIC CHURCHRONALD M SIMON FOUNDATION: $85,000 · OtherRONALD M SIMON FOUNDATIONROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF LOS ANGELES A CORPORATION SOLE: $67,500 · OtherROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF LOS ANGELES A CORPORATION SOLEJESUS IS THE WAY MBC: $33,800 · OtherTHE SERVANTS OF SACRED HEART OF JESUS MARY JOSEPH: $32,770 · Other+7 more: $75,641 · Other+7 moreTHE WEBB SCHOOLS: $36,500 · EducationTHE WEBB …THE RENAISSANCE LEARNING CENTER INC: $26,544 · EducationTHE RENAI…Los Angeles Rams Foundation: $26,100 · EducationLos Angel…UCLA FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationUCLA FOUN…Northwood University: $5,470 · EducationAID VILLAGE CHILDREN AFRICA (AVICA): $81,200 · InternationalST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $36,000 · HealthTHE HAROLD AND CAROLE PUMP FOUNDATION (FKA THE HAROLD PUMP FOUNDATION): $15,000 · HealthCATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $50,000 · ReligionCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $30,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT 150: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE SENSORY-COGNITIVE FOUNDATION FOR LEARNING INC: $26,415 · PhilanthropyTHE WENTE FAMILY FOUNDATION FOR ARTS EDUCATION: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$955,002Education$114,614International$81,200Health$51,000Religion$50,000Human Services$40,000Philanthropy$36,415

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAID VILLAGE CHILDREN AFRICA (AVICA): $81,200 over 6y, 63% of budgetCATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE WEBB SCHOOLS: $36,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $36,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE RENAISSANCE LEARNING CENTER INC: $26,544 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SENSORY-COGNITIVE FOUNDATION FOR LEARNING INC: $26,415 over 1y, 43% of budgetLos Angeles Rams Foundation: $26,100 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HAROLD AND CAROLE PUMP FOUNDATION (FKA THE HAROLD PUMP FOUNDATION): $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE WENTE FAMILY FOUNDATION FOR ARTS EDUCATION: $10,000 over 1y, 48% of budgetNorthwood University: $5,470 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RONALD M SIMON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AID VILLAGE CHILDREN AFRICA (AVICA) ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds THE WEBB SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA ↗
  • Who funds THE RENAISSANCE LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SENSORY-COGNITIVE FOUNDATION FOR LEARNING INC ↗
  • Who funds Los Angeles Rams Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE HAROLD AND CAROLE PUMP FOUNDATION (FKA THE HAROLD PUMP FOUNDATION) ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT 150 ↗
  • Who funds THE WENTE FAMILY FOUNDATION FOR ARTS EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds Northwood University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community …Morgan Stanley Global…Gs Donor Advised Phil…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
California Community FoundationCA11.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Anabi Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Anabi Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • The Renaissance Learning Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Anabi Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home