How much did AMY WELLNESS FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

AMY WELLNESS FOUNDATION reported 33 grants totaling $2,368,017 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is AMY WELLNESS FOUNDATION based?

AMY WELLNESS FOUNDATION is based in NC.

AMY WELLNESS FOUNDATION

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

AMY WELLNESS FOUNDATION

Raise funds for community support

$2.4M

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$500k

Largest

01What you fund

0173% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2024.

Youth Development$1.6MHealth$1.1MFood & Nutrition$894kHuman Services$508kEducation$319kCrime & Legal$200kPhilanthropy$50kEmployment$20kOther$1.7M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

—

2020

education childrenpartnering disadvantageddisadvantaged toolstools becomebecome self-sufficientmaylandcovid

2021

buildinglegalavery youthresiliencechildren

2022

legalbuildingresilienceavery

2023

buildinghealth

2024

hurricane helenemental healthhurr housinghurr mentalhurr foodavery

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k1 grant · $7k
$10k–50k18 grants · $365k
$50k–250k11 grants · $918k
$250k+3 grants · $1.1M

$40,625

Median grant

States reached

$11M

Total assets

Largest grants

AVERY YMCA$500,000
MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY HEALTH$300,000
HIGH COUNTRY COMMUNITY HEALTH$250,000
TRACTOR FOOD & FARMS$150,000
W A M Y COMMUNITY ACTION INC$130,000
MITCHELL COUNTY SAFE PLACE$100,000
AVERY COUNTY GOVERNMENT$100,000
SOUTHERN RECONCILIATION MINISTRIES$80,625
FEEDING AVERY FAMILIES$72,600
DIG IN YANCEY COMMUNITY GARDEN$70,000
PARTNERS ALIGNED TOWARD HEALTH$60,000
MITCHELL SHEPHERDS STAFF$55,000
AVERY COUNTY SCHOOLS$50,000
HANDS OF HOPE$50,000
CENTER FOR RURAL HEALTH INNOVATION$45,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $508k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$5.2M · 22 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +65% since the first grant, against +35% for the ones you funded once.

22 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$5.2M

$573k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%

+35%

Still filing today

86%

50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $620k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionEducationEmploymentYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

YO
YMCA OF AVERY COUNTY
5× · 2020–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +442%
WA
W A M Y COMMUNITY ACTION INC
4× · 2020–2024 · $747k · revenue +62%
TF
TRACTOR FOOD & FARMS
3× · 2020–2024 · $369k · revenue +163% · 30% of their budget

Funded once

BR
BLUE RIDGE REGIONAL HOSPITAL INC
one grant, 2019 · $153k · revenue -97%
MC
MITCHELL COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORT
one grant, 2021 · $84k
CC
CROSSNORE COMMUNITIES FOR CHILDREN
one grant, 2021 · $75k · revenue +4%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Wnc Communities

WNC Communities empowers the people of Western North Carolina to cultivate the vitality and prosperity of mountain communities through collaboration and agricultural opportunities.

Food & Nutrition

NourishNC Inc

Provide healthy food to hungry children, empowering them to succeed in the classroom and in their community

Food & Nutrition

Beaufort-Jasper-Hampton Comprehensive

Provide community healthcare services to the citizens in the low country of south carolina.

Health

Carolina Family Health Centers Inc

Provide quality healthcare to the people of edgecombe, nash and wilson counties.

—

Wnc Health Network Inc

WNC Health Network, Inc supports people and organizations to improve community health and wellbeing across Western North Carolina.

Health

Helping Hands High Point Inc

Providing food and assistance to the disadvantaged in high point, nc

Human Services

First Choice Community Health Ctrs

Providing healthcare to the underserved population of Harnett County NC and the surrounding area.

Health

Mountain Housing Opportunities Inc

To provide affordable housing for low-income individuals living in buncombe county and the surrounding areas of north carolina.

Housing & Shelter

May Coalition Inc

To create high quality employment opportunities for unemployed and underemployed residents of mitchell, avery, and yancey counties in north carolina

Employment

Triad Adult & Pediatric Medicine Inc

Triad Adult and Pediatric Medicine provides the residents of Guilford County, NC with exceptional healthcare that is comprehensive and delivered with compassion and respect.

Health

Appalachian Mountain Community Health Centers

The organization provides health care to individuals regardless of their ability to pay. this is a direct fulfillment of their tax exempt purpose.

Health

Tri-County Community Health Council Inc

Provider of comprehensive, compassionate, high quality primary medical, dental, pharmacy and behavioral health services in southeastern north carolina.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mountain Community Health Partnership Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Community Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/41

the rest of the field

59/639

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

37 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

35/37

Grantees still filing

30/37

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,802,234Youth Development$1,576,074Health$1,091,329Food & Nutrition$893,840Human Services$508,365Education$318,920Crime & Legal$200,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dogwood Health TrustNC44.6× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dogwood Health Trust · The Community Foundation · Manna Food Bank Inc · The High Country Charitable Foundation · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Samuel L Phillips Family Foundation · Wnc Bridge Foundation · The Conservation Fund a Nonprofit · Mountain Air Community Fund Inc · High Country United Way · Impact Health · Arthur Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation AMY WELLNESS FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MITCHELL GIVING GARDENS.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.6× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 862012354 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on MITCHELL GIVING GARDENS, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 66% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Amy Wellness Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Amy Wellness Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

AMY WELLNESS FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

37 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Amy Wellness Foundation?

More from the funding graph

AMY WELLNESS FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

37 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Amy Wellness Foundation?

More from the funding graph