· Private foundation
Amerihealth Caritas Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k3 grants · $75k
- $50k–250k19 grants · $1.8M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $150,000 |
| WAKEMED FOUNDATION | $150,000 |
| IMPACT SERVICES | $150,000 |
| TOTAL COMMUNITY ACTION | $150,000 |
| COMMUNITY RENEWAL INTERNATIONAL | $100,000 |
| PENNSYLVANIA PARTNERSHIPS FOR CHILDREN | $100,000 |
| GRANITE UNITED WAY | $100,000 |
| LIFESPRING HEALTH SYSTEMS | $100,000 |
| CHILDREN'S LAW CENTER | $100,000 |
| DUFFY'S HOPE | $100,000 |
| HARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK | $75,000 |
| CHILDREN TRUST MICHIGAN | $75,000 |
| PASSION WORKS | $75,000 |
| THE CHILDREN'S CENTER | $75,000 |
| CHILDREN'S TRUST OF SOUTH CAROLINA | $75,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $230k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 3% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.8M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DBDOWNTOWN BOXING GYM YOUTH PROGRAM2× · 2023–2024 · $250k · revenue +46%
- ALAMERICAN LUNG ASSOC OF DELAWARE2× · 2018–2019 · $20k
- RCROMAN CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL2× · 2019–2020 · $2k
Funded once
- UOUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH CENTER FOR PARENTS AND CHILDRENone grant, 2023 · $250k
MARCH OF DIMES INCone grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue -6%- CICOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLSone grant, 2023 · $200k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…
Empowering south carolina communities and children's advocacy centers to deliver a best practice response to child abuse
Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…
To strengthen youth and families while enhancing systems and communities.
Our mission is to dramatically improve the early career outcomes of dc youth and young adults of color by creating innovative programs and by mobilizing employers, educators, and city leaders to create a local, diverse talent pipeline. our…
Summary
Tcc's vision is that all children are ebraced by our community as our own and supported to reach their full potential in school and in life, creadle to career. our mission is to build collective power to transfoarm education by changing…
United way of the csra mobilizes the caring power of our community to make lasting change on the issues that matter most in our region. we want to ensure that children, young adults, and families have the tools and resources they need to…
Mobilizing the power of our community to break the cycle of poverty.
Commmunity action commission's mission is to build on the strengths and resources available, provide solutions, for complex issues, and empower individuals, families, and communities to move out of poverty.
Charlotte center city partners (cccp) boldly envisions and activates strategies and actions that will assure charlotte center city is a welcoming and equitable, economically vibrant, culturally rich and beloved place for all.
To improve the well-being, care and education for the whole child.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Central West Virginia and the most unlike its peers is De National Guard Youth Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
- Who funds DOWNTOWN BOXING GYM YOUTH PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds THE COBBS CREEK RESTORATION AND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TOTAL COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds IMPACT SERVICES CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds LIFESPRING INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GRANITE UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds DUFFYS HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds PENNSYLVANIA PARTNERSHIPS FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY RENEWAL INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds PASSION WORKS ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S TRUST OF SOUTH CAROLINA ↗
- Who funds HARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds NAMI Western Carolina Inc ↗
- Who funds APPALACHIAN CHILDREN COALITION ↗
- Who funds FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL WEST VIRGINIA ↗
- Who funds THE LEARNING ACADEMY OF BASKETBALL INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY AREA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC ↗
- Who funds YMCA OF KANAWHA VALLEY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The William Penn Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Amerihealth Caritas Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- University Area Community Development Corporation Inc — 100% of income from government
- Duffys Hope Inc — 83% of income from government
- Feeding South Florida Inc — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Amerihealth Caritas Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Amerihealth Caritas Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.