Skip to content
Amerihealth Caritas Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Amerihealth Caritas Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$739kHealth$635kYouth Development$507kHuman Services$259kCommunity Improvement$254kRecreation & Sports$202kHousing & Shelter$200kEmployment$150kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k19 grants · $1.8M
$75,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$47M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$150,000
WAKEMED FOUNDATION$150,000
IMPACT SERVICES$150,000
TOTAL COMMUNITY ACTION$150,000
CHILDREN'S LAW CENTER$100,000
PENNSYLVANIA PARTNERSHIPS FOR CHILDREN$100,000
COMMUNITY RENEWAL INTERNATIONAL$100,000
LIFESPRING HEALTH SYSTEMS$100,000
GRANITE UNITED WAY$100,000
DUFFY'S HOPE$100,000
HARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK$75,000
CHILDREN'S TRUST OF SOUTH CAROLINA$75,000
PASSION WORKS$75,000
CHILDREN TRUST MICHIGAN$75,000
THE CHILDREN'S CENTER$75,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $230k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE OUTREACH CENTER: $3k → 13%TOTAL COMMUNITY ACTION: $150k → 23%YMCA OF KANAWHA VALLEY: $3k → 18%CHILDREN'S TRUST OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $75k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MI
IN
OH
PA
WV
VA
DE
NC
SC
DC
LA
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

8%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$272k · 3 repeat orgs$3.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
30

Total granted

$272k
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
-1%

Still filing today

33%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 3% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.8M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DB
    DOWNTOWN BOXING GYM YOUTH PROGRAM
    2× · 2023–2024 · $250k · revenue +46%
  • AL
    AMERICAN LUNG ASSOC OF DELAWARE
    2× · 2018–2019 · $20k
  • RC
    ROMAN CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL
    2× · 2019–2020 · $2k

Funded once

  • MARCH OF DIMES INC
    one grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue -6%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH CENTER FOR PARENTS AND CHILDREN
    one grant, 2023 · $250k
  • PT
    PATHWAYS TO HOUSING PENNSYLVANIA
    one grant, 2023 · $200k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
2
South Carolina Network of Children's Advocacy Centers

Empowering south carolina communities and children's advocacy centers to deliver a best practice response to child abuse

Youth Development
3
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
4
Choices Coordinated Care Solutions Inc

To strengthen youth and families while enhancing systems and communities.

Human Services
5
Cityworks Dc

Our mission is to dramatically improve the early career outcomes of dc youth and young adults of color by creating innovative programs and by mobilizing employers, educators, and city leaders to create a local, diverse talent pipeline. our…

Education
6
Children First Pa

Summary

Human Services
7
Tri-County Cradle to Career Collaborative

Tcc's vision is that all children are ebraced by our community as our own and supported to reach their full potential in school and in life, creadle to career. our mission is to build collective power to transfoarm education by changing…

Education
8
United Way of the Csra Inc

United way of the csra mobilizes the caring power of our community to make lasting change on the issues that matter most in our region. we want to ensure that children, young adults, and families have the tools and resources they need to…

—
9
United Way of Charlotte County Inc

Mobilizing the power of our community to break the cycle of poverty.

Philanthropy
10
Community Action Commission

Commmunity action commission's mission is to build on the strengths and resources available, provide solutions, for complex issues, and empower individuals, families, and communities to move out of poverty.

Human Services
11
Charlotte Center City Partners

Charlotte center city partners (cccp) boldly envisions and activates strategies and actions that will assure charlotte center city is a welcoming and equitable, economically vibrant, culturally rich and beloved place for all.

—
12
Child Care Answers of Central Indiana

To improve the well-being, care and education for the whole child.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Central West Virginia; the most unlike its peers is De National Guard Youth Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/26
Grantees still filing
12/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH CENTER FOR PARENTS AND CHILDREN: $250,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH CENTER FOR PARENTS AND CHILDRENPATHWAYS TO HOUSING PENNSYLVANIA: $200,000 · OtherPATHWAYS TO HOUSING PENNSYLVANIAUNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA - IGNITES PROGRAM FUND: $200,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA - IGNITES PROGRAM FUNDCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS: $200,000 · OtherCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLSIndividual grant recipient: $150,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWAKEMED FOUNDATION: $150,000 · OtherWAKEMED FOUNDATIONGRANITE UNITED WAY: $100,000 · OtherMICHIGAN DEP OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES: $75,000 · OtherTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $75,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S LAW CENTER INC: $100,000 · OtherHARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK: $75,000 · OtherPASSION WORKS: $75,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $70,000 · Other+26 more: $266,050 · Other+26 moreDOWNTOWN BOXING GYM YOUTH PROGRAM: $250,000 · Recreation & SportsDOWNTOWN BOXIN…THE COBBS CREEK RESTORATION AND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $200,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE COBBS CREE…MARCH OF DIMES INC: $250,000 · HealthMARCH OF DIM…LIFESPRING INC: $100,000 · HealthLIFESPRING I…APPALACHIAN CHILDREN COALITION: $25,000 · HealthAPPALACHIAN …TOTAL COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $150,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S TRUST OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $75,000 · Human Services+2 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesPENNSYLVANIA PARTNERSHIPS FOR CHILDREN: $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentDUFFYS HOPE INC: $100,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentIMPACT SERVICES CORPORATION: $150,000 · EmploymentCOMMUNITY RENEWAL INTERNATIONAL INC: $100,000 · Community ImprovementUNIVERSITY AREA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC: $3,500 · Community Improvement
Other$1,986,050Recreation & Sports$450,000Health$375,000Human Services$230,000Youth Development$202,500Employment$150,000Community Improvement$103,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $250,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDOWNTOWN BOXING GYM YOUTH PROGRAM: $250,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetTHE COBBS CREEK RESTORATION AND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetTOTAL COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $150,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetIMPACT SERVICES CORPORATION: $150,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA PARTNERSHIPS FOR CHILDREN: $100,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY RENEWAL INTERNATIONAL INC: $100,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetGRANITE UNITED WAY: $100,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetDUFFYS HOPE INC: $100,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetCHILDREN'S LAW CENTER INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLIFESPRING INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S TRUST OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $75,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHARVEST HOPE FOOD BANK: $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPASSION WORKS: $75,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $70,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI Western Carolina Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetAPPALACHIAN CHILDREN COALITION: $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL WEST VIRGINIA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY AREA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE OUTREACH CENTER: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDE National Guard Youth Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetYMCA OF KANAWHA VALLEY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetColumbus Recreation and Parks Foundation: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The William Penn Foun…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Enterprise Holdings F…Charities Aid Foundat…Gs Donor Advised Phil…The Bank of America C…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The William Penn FoundationPA13× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The William Penn Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Amerihealth Caritas Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Amerihealth Caritas Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 83%
  • University Area Community Development Corporation Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Duffys Hope Inc: 83% of income from government
  • Feeding South Florida Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Amerihealth Caritas Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Amerihealth Caritas Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Amerihealth Caritas’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home