· Public charity
American Association of Colleges of Nursing
As the collective voice for academic nursing, aacn serves as the catalyst for excellence and innovation in nursing education, research, and practice.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 51% of AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES OF NURSING’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 57 grants below total $584,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $703,602 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $119,602 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k27 grants · $162k
- $10k–50k30 grants · $422k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNC CHARLOTTE SCHOOL OF NURSING | $25,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS SCHOOL OF NURSING | $25,000 |
| THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA | $18,000 |
| WALLA WALLA UNIVERSITY | $15,000 |
| THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON | $15,000 |
| TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY | $15,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI | $15,000 |
| SAMUEL MERRITT UNIVERSITY | $15,000 |
| CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY | $15,000 |
| RUSSELL SAGE COLLEGE | $15,000 |
| JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY | $15,000 |
| WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY | $15,000 |
| FAIRFIELD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NURSING | $15,000 |
| DUKE UNIVERSITY | $12,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN | $12,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 74% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
50 repeat relationships — 37 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $188k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SMSamuel Merritt University4× · 2017–2025 · $120k · revenue +49%
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY3× · 2023–2025 · $112k · revenue +4%
Fairfield University4× · 2019–2025 · $109k · revenue +48%
Funded once
- FSFLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITYone grant, 2022 · $70k
- COCURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURIone grant, 2022 · $70k
- TTTennessee Technological Universityone grant, 2022 · $70k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…
Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…
The washington university is a co-educational, nondenominational university with a long and distinguished history of teaching, research and (cont'd on schedule o)
As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…
Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…
Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.
At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…
The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…
See Schedule O. See explanation for Form 990, Part I, Line 1 - Organization's Mission above.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Education and Research
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgetown University and the most unlike its peers is Seattle University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 65 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
64 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 64 of the 132 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Samuel Merritt University ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Fairfield University ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds Creighton University ↗
- Who funds RUSSELL SAGE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds WALLA WALLA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Emory University ↗
- Who funds McKendree University ↗
- Who funds LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds New York University ↗
- Who funds PACE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds FRONTIER NURSING UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds University of Miami ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: National Collegiate Athletic Association · Folds of Honor Foundation · American Chemical Society · Tulsa Community Foundation · Kpmg US Foundation Inc · American Heart Association Inc · Johns Hopkins University · National Collegiate Inventors & Innovators Alliance Inc · The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York · Columbus Foundation · National Writing Project Corporation · National Geographic Society
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization American Association of Colleges of Nursing funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Johns Hopkins University — 11% of income from government
- Yale University — 9% of income from government
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
- Northeastern University — 4% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston College — 2% of income from government
- University of Portland — 2% of income from government
- Regis College — 1% of income from government
- Fairleigh Dickinson University — 1% of income from government
- The Morgan State University Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
- Fairfield University — 1% of income from government
- Seton Hall University — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.