Skip to content

· Public charity

Altruisity Foundation Inc

The organization provides funds to other qualifying non-profit organizations for humanitarian reflief.

$325k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$2.0MInternational$1.3MEducation$517kHousing & Shelter$324kFood & Nutrition$300kCivil Rights$200kHuman Services$129kYouth Development$81kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$200,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WE CHARITY$200,000
KIDS BEATING CANCER$125,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NATIONAL COMPASSION FUND LAS VEGAS: $2k → 9%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE: $200k → 17%KIDS BEATING CANCER: $1.0M → 13%KIDS BEATING CANCER: $221k → 13%Kids Beating Cancer: $250k → 13%KIDS BEATING CANCER: $125k → 13%Kids Beating Cancer: $100k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
NV
IN
CA
VA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 6 repeat orgs$2.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +78% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
17

Total granted

$2.9M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+15%

Still filing today

100%
94%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KB
    KIDS BEATING CANCER INC
    5× · 2018–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +142% · 64% of their budget
  • WC
    WE CHARITY WILLIAM C MORAN & ASSOC PC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $460k · revenue +119%
  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    2× · 2017–2022 · $301k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • RM
    Ronald McDonald House Globalgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $500k · revenue +49%
  • RT
    REBUILDING TOGETHER GREATER FLORIDA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue +116%
  • NU
    NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $200k · revenue -65%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
2
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
3
Childfund Alliance

Childfund alliance is a global network of 11 child-focused development and humanitarian organizations working in more than 70 countries. we help nearly 30 million children and their families to overcome poverty and the underlying…

International
4
Oncology and Kids Inc

To help kids and families heal the emotional scars of childhood cancer and learn to thrive.

Human Services
5
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Greater Charlotte Inc

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Greater Charlotte (RMHC of GC) provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare. Charlotte is recognized as a leading destination…

Human Services
6
Global Fund for Children

Global fund for children partners with grassroots organizations around the world to help children and youth reach their full potential and advance their rights.

Arts & Culture
7
Bounce Children's Foundation

Bounce children's foundation transforms the lives of chronically ill children, and their families, shifting all from surviving to thriving.

Health
8
Kids in Need Foundation

We believe every child in america should have equal opportunity and resources to engage in a quality education. by partnering with teachers and students in under-resourced schools, we provide the support needed to create equitable learning…

Education
9
Cog Research Foundation Llc

Cog research foundation, llc is a california 501(c)(3) entity founded in 2024 and designed to become the federal grantee organization for the children's oncology group (cog). the cog, a member of the national cancer institute (nci)…

Health
10
Make-a-Wish Foundation International

None

Human Services
11
Hospital for Sick Children Foundation

Our Mission is to inspire our communities to invest in health and scientific advances to improve the health of children and their families in Canada and around the world.

Human Services
12
National Comprehensive Cancer Network

To define and advance quality, effective, equitable, and accessible cancer care and prevention so all people can live better lives.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Feeding America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
15/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KIDS BEATING CANCER INC: $1,696,314 · Human ServicesKIDS BEATING CANCER INCNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $200,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC+1 more: $2,328 · Human ServicesWE CHARITY WILLIAM C MORAN & ASSOC PC: $460,000 · InternationalWE CHARITY WILLIAM C MORAN …UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $300,587 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNIC…The Global FoodBanking Network: $200,000 · InternationalThe Global FoodBanking Netw…HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $124,186 · InternationalHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERN…CHILDREN INCORPORATED: $102,233 · InternationalCHILDREN INCORPORATEDRonald McDonald House Global: $500,000 · HealthRonald McDonal…Runway to Hope Inc: $75,000 · HealthRunway to Hope…Westchester Medical Center Foundation: $33,600 · HealthWestchester Me…+1 more: $10,000 · HealthMending Kids International dba Mending Kids: $172,407 · OtherMending Kids In…RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $128,831 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD…COTA - Children's Organ Transplant Association: $104,292 · OtherCOTA - Children…Houston Independent School District Foundation: $25,000 · OtherFeeding America: $100,000 · OtherFeeding AmericaBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $80,819 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS …+2 more: $34,570 · Other+2 moreREBUILDING TOGETHER GREATER FLORIDA INC: $200,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE FOUNDATION FOR SEMINOLE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $183,325 · EducationCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $138,686 · Philanthropy
Human Services$1,898,642International$1,187,006Health$618,600Other$645,919Housing & Shelter$200,000Education$183,325Philanthropy$138,686

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKIDS BEATING CANCER INC: $1,696,314 over 5y, 64% of budgetRonald McDonald House Global: $500,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWE CHARITY WILLIAM C MORAN & ASSOC PC: $460,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $300,587 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER GREATER FLORIDA INC: $200,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $200,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Global FoodBanking Network: $200,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMending Kids International dba Mending Kids: $172,407 over 2y, 8.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $138,686 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $128,831 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $124,186 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOTA - Children's Organ Transplant Association: $104,292 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCHILDREN INCORPORATED: $102,233 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetFeeding America: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $80,819 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetRunway to Hope Inc: $75,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetWestchester Medical Center Foundation: $33,600 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHouston Independent School District Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $18,285 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOGETHER WE RISE: $16,285 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF CRIME INC: $2,328 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY16.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Altruisity Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Altruisity Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
  • National Center for Victims of Crime Inc: 10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Altruisity Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Altruisity Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Altruisity’s filings →

More from the funding graph