Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Allyn's Creek Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$100kEnvironment$66kEducation$43kPhilanthropy$26kHealth$18kFood & Nutrition$14kHousing & Shelter$14kReligion$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDLY SENIOR LIVING$25,000
FRIENDS OF CANANDAIGUA LAKE$25,000
EQUICENTER$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HILLSIDE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%HILLSIDE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%HILLSIDE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%HILLSIDE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%HILLSIDE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%HILLSIDE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%HILLSIDE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%YMCA OF GREATER ROCHESTER: $500 → 14%YMCA OF GREATER ROCHESTER: $400 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$258k · 31 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

31 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
8

Total granted

$258k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
0%

Still filing today

65%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MP
    MISS PORTER'S SCHOOL INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $15k · revenue +94%
  • FI
    FOODLINK INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $14k · revenue +52%
  • FC
    FLOWER CITY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $13k · revenue +203%

Funded once

  • RS
    RENEWAL SERVICES ROCHESTER INC
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • GE
    GEORGE EASTMAN MUSEUMgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +42%
  • HOMESTEADS FOR HOPE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue -18%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
4
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
5
Rochester General College of Health Careers

The rochester general college of health careers is dedicated to preparing adult learners with the knowledge, skills, and competencies necessary to pursue health careers, advanced education, and lifelong learning.

Education
6
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
7
Amherst College Trustees

Amherst college educates students of exceptional potential from all backgrounds so that they may seek value and advance knowledge, engage the world around them, and lead principled lives of consequence. amherst brings together the most…

Education
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

9
St Francis College

St. francis college is an independent, coeducational institution of higher education chartered by an act of the regents of the university of the state of new york on april 10, 1957.

Education
10
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
11
New York Medical College

New york medical college (nymc), a member of touro university, is a health sciences college whose purpose is to educate clinical and public health professionals as well as researchers, to conduct biomedical and population-based research…

12
The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science & Art

See schedule ovision: the cooper union for the advancement of science and art is dedicated to peter cooper's radical commitment to diversity and his founding vision that fair access to an inspiring free education and forums for courageous…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Syracuse University and the most unlike its peers is Rochester Female Charitable Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Social ServicesDisability Services Organiz…Community Foundations and G…Affordable Housing Developm…Early Childhood Care and Ed…Regional History MuseumsRochester Charter and Prepa…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 62 years old; the field is 23. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number15%4%<5yr12%0%5–10yr18%4%10–20yr17%19%20–35yr14%11%35–55yr23%63%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value15%13%<5yr12%0%5–10yr18%1%10–20yr17%20%20–35yr14%14%35–55yr23%53%55yr+

The field is 15% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 13% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
8%
705/9,168

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
19/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FRIENDLY SENIOR LIVING — $80,000 · OtherFRIENDLY SENIOR LIVINGTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $29,850 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYFRIENDS OF CANANDAIGUA LAKE INC — $25,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF CANANDAIGUA LAKE INCUNITED WAY OF GREATER ROCHESTER — $14,050 · OtherUNITED WAY OF GREATER ROCHESTERST PAULS EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $13,625 · OtherST PAULS EPISCOPAL CHURCHROCHESTER FEMALE CHARITABLE SOCIETY — $10,750 · OtherTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER ROCHESTER — $7,400 · Other+15 more — $29,550 · Other+15 moreMISS PORTER'S SCHOOL INC — $15,000 · EducationMISS PORTER'S …ALLENDALE COLUMBIA SCHOOL — $11,400 · EducationALLENDALE COLU…UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $6,750 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF …ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY — $6,000 · EducationST LAWRENCE UN…+4 more — $2,900 · Education+4 moreHILLSIDE FOUNDATION — $14,200 · Human ServicesYMCA OF GREATER ROCHESTER (4368) — $900 · Human ServicesFOODLINK INC — $14,250 · Food & NutritionFLOWER CITY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $13,000 · Housing & ShelterHOMESTEADS FOR HOPE INC — $1,000 · Housing & ShelterEQUICENTER INC — $13,000 · Health+1 more — $200 · HealthAllyn's Creek Garden Club Inc — $5,500 · EnvironmentThe Finger Lakes Land Trust Inc — $4,000 · EnvironmentNew York Forest Owners Association Inc — $1,700 · EnvironmentSONNENBERG GARDENS AND MANSION- STATE HISTORIC PARK — $1,200 · Environment
Other$210,225Education$42,050Human Services$15,100Food & Nutrition$14,250Housing & Shelter$14,000Health$13,200Environment$12,400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $29,850 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMISS PORTER'S SCHOOL INC — $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFOODLINK INC — $14,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSIDE FOUNDATION — $14,200 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetFLOWER CITY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $13,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetEQUICENTER INC — $13,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALLENDALE COLUMBIA SCHOOL — $11,400 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetROCHESTER FEMALE CHARITABLE SOCIETY — $10,750 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER ROCHESTER — $7,400 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $6,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Finger Lakes Land Trust Inc — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNew York Forest Owners Association Inc — $1,700 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSONNENBERG GARDENS AND MANSION- STATE HISTORIC PARK — $1,200 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGEORGE EASTMAN MUSEUM — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOMESTEADS FOR HOPE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYMCA OF GREATER ROCHESTER (4368) — $900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY-PAWLING SCHOOL CORPORATION — $900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNew England College — $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNAZARETH UNIVERSITY — $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRICHARD J CARON FOUNDATION — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROCHESTER MUSEUM & SCIENCE CENTER — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds MISS PORTER'S SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds FOODLINK INC
  • Who funds HILLSIDE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FLOWER CITY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC
  • Who funds EQUICENTER INC
  • Who funds ALLENDALE COLUMBIA SCHOOL
  • Who funds ROCHESTER FEMALE CHARITABLE SOCIETY
  • Who funds THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER ROCHESTER
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER
  • Who funds ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Allyn's Creek Garden Club Inc
  • Who funds The Finger Lakes Land Trust Inc
  • Who funds New York Forest Owners Association Inc
  • Who funds SONNENBERG GARDENS AND MANSION- STATE HISTORIC PARK
  • Who funds GEORGE EASTMAN MUSEUM
  • Who funds HOMESTEADS FOR HOPE INC
  • Who funds YMCA OF GREATER ROCHESTER (4368)
  • Who funds TRINITY-PAWLING SCHOOL CORPORATION
  • Who funds SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds New England College
  • Who funds NAZARETH UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds RICHARD J CARON FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rochester Area Community FoundationNY26.7× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rochester Area Community Foundation · United Way of Greater Rochester and the Finger Lakes Inc · Rochester Area Community Foundation Depository Inc · Max and Marian Farash Charitable Foundation · Paychex Charitable Foundation Inc · Daisy Marquis Jones Foundation · Greater Rochester Health Foundation · Esl Charitable Foundation · F Irving Hutchins Charitable Trust Xxxxx9004 · Rochester Female Charitable Society · Summers Foundation Inc · Waldron Rise Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Allyn's Creek Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph