Skip to content

· Private foundation

Allsup Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$719k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$210k
Largest
01What it funds
0139% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$1.4MYouth Development$777kHuman Services$662kPhilanthropy$427kEnvironment$380kHealth$151kArts & Culture$125kReligion$35kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $167k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $524k
$27,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$37k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JACKIE JOYNER KERSEE FOUNDATION$210,463
SISTER THEA BOWMAN CATHOLIC SCHOOL$160,000
CHRISTIAN ACTIVITY CENTER$94,233
CATHOLIC URBAN PROGRAMS$59,125
ALLSUP CHARITABLE SERVICES INC$30,000
SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL$30,000
UNITY LUTHERAN CHRISTIAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$29,250
K2 ADVENTURES FOUNDATION$27,500
ART ON THE SQUARE$25,000
MCDOWELL SONORAN CONSERVANCY$15,000
MOUNT CARMEL CEMETERY$10,000
ALTHOFF CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$8,167
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS$7,500
THE COLLEGE OF GOVERNOR FRENCH$5,906
LUTHERN NORTH HIGH SCHOOL$4,402
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $657k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GATEWAY REGION YMCA: $3k → 21%GATEWAY REGION YMCA: $2k → 21%GATEWAY REGION YMCA: $1k → 21%SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $30k → 16%SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $30k → 16%SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $30k → 16%SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $30k → 16%SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $30k → 16%SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $30k → 16%CHRISTIAN ACTIVITY CENTER: $125k → 16%CHRISTIAN ACTIVITY CENTER: $120k → 16%CHRISTIAN ACTIVITY CENTER: $94k → 16%CHRISTIAN ACTIVITY CENTER: $62k → 16%CHRISTIAN ACTIVITY CENTER: $42k → 16%CHRISTIAN ACTIVITY CENTER: $28k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.9M · 29 repeat orgs$150k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
168

Total granted

$3.9M
$100k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
0%

Still filing today

34%
1%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesEducationEnvironmentReligionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JJ
    JACKIE JOYNER KERSEE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $728k · revenue +332%
  • SL
    ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2020–2023 · $467k · revenue +18%
  • SO
    Society of St Vincent De Paul
    6× · 2020–2025 · $180k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • HF
    HOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
  • MO
    MISSION ONE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -33%
  • MB
    MATHEWS-DICKEY BOYS' & GIRLS' CLUB
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Girl Scouts of Central Illinois

Girl scouts builds girls of courage, confidence, and character who make the world a better place.

—
2
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
3
Girls Incorporated of St Louis

The mission of girls incorporated of st. louis is to inspire all girls to be strong, smart, and bold by providing educational, recreational, and cultural programs to girls in a safe environment to enable them to raise their aspirations and…

Youth Development
4
Mission St Louis

Mission: st. louis empowers individuals for social and economic growth through relationships and opportunity.

Community Improvement
5
Thomas Jefferson School

Thomas jefferson school engages its students in the education necessary to live as responsible citizens of the world. through the strongest possible college-prepatory program and within a nurturing community, students develop a…

—
6
Avila University

Avila university, a catholic university sponsored by saint joseph educational ministries, a ministerial public juridic person of the catholic church (sjem), is a values-based community of learning providing liberal arts, professional,…

Education
7
United Way of Greater St Joseph

The mission of the united way of greater st. joseph is to improve lives through the caring power of community.

Philanthropy
8
St Louis Christian College

Saint louis christian college prepares biblical servant leaders for urban, suburban, rural, and global ministry.

—
9
World Affairs Council of St Louis

Education, non-partisan, membership organization that encourages people and organizations in the region to take an interest in, to learn more about, and to participate to a greater extent in global matters.

International
10
Girl Scouts of Utah

Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence and character who make the world a better place.

Youth Development
11
Girl Scouts of Greater Chicago and Northwest Indiana

(continued on schedule o)

Youth Development
12
Leadership Council Southwestern Illinois

Uniting the southwestern illinois and greater st. louis region for economic growth

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christian Activity Center; the most unlike its peers is The College of Governor French. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 201 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SISTER THEA BOWMAN CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $773,670 · OtherSISTER THEA BOWMAN CATHOLIC SCHOOLCATHOLIC URBAN PROGRAMS: $336,692 · OtherCATHOLIC URBAN PROGRAMSART ON THE SQUARE: $125,000 · OtherART ON THE SQUARE+184 more: $216,503 · Other+184 moreJACKIE JOYNER KERSEE FOUNDATION: $727,971 · Youth DevelopmentJACKIE JOYNER KERSEE FOU…K2 ADVENTURES FOUNDATION: $150,530 · Youth DevelopmentK2 ADVENTURES FOUNDATION+1 more: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentCHRISTIAN ACTIVITY CENTER: $470,886 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN ACTIVITY…Society of St Vincent De Paul: $180,000 · Human ServicesSociety of St Vinc…+1 more: $5,700 · Human ServicesST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $467,000 · EducationST LOUIS UNIVERS…ASSUMPTION ALUMNI EDUCATIONAL RESOURCE ASSOCIATION: $125,000 · EducationASSUMPTION ALUMN…+1 more: $5,906 · EducationMCDOWELL SONORAN CONSERVANCY: $380,000 · EnvironmentMCDOWELL S…ALLSUP CHARITABLE SERVICES INC: $85,000 · HealthMISSION ONE INC: $5,000 · ReligionUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $3,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,451,865Youth Development$879,501Human Services$656,586Education$597,906Environment$380,000Health$85,000Religion$5,000Philanthropy$3,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJACKIE JOYNER KERSEE FOUNDATION: $727,971 over 6y, 3.2% of budgetCHRISTIAN ACTIVITY CENTER: $470,886 over 6y, 13% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $467,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMCDOWELL SONORAN CONSERVANCY: $380,000 over 5y, 15% of budgetSociety of St Vincent De Paul: $180,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetK2 ADVENTURES FOUNDATION: $150,530 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetASSUMPTION ALUMNI EDUCATIONAL RESOURCE ASSOCIATION: $125,000 over 5y, 83% of budgetALLSUP CHARITABLE SERVICES INC: $85,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetThe College of Governor French: $5,906 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGATEWAY REGION YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $5,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION ONE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMATHEWS-DICKEY BOYS' & GIRLS' CLUB: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN ILLINOIS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JACKIE JOYNER KERSEE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN ACTIVITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MCDOWELL SONORAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Society of St Vincent De Paul ↗
  • Who funds K2 ADVENTURES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ASSUMPTION ALUMNI EDUCATIONAL RESOURCE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ALLSUP CHARITABLE SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds The College of Governor French ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAY REGION YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MISSION ONE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC ↗
  • Who funds MATHEWS-DICKEY BOYS' & GIRLS' CLUB ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN ILLINOIS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Commerce Bancshares FoundationMO17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Commerce Bancshares Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Allsup Charitable Services Inc · St Louis Community Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Allsup Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Allsup Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Allsup Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Allsup Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 201 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Allsup Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph