· Private foundation
Allstadt Hardin Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k82 grants · $66k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $60k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OSTEGO COUNTY | $30,000 |
| EARTHJUSTICE | $10,000 |
| EARTH JUSTICE | $10,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OSTEGO COUNTY | $10,000 |
| EARTHJUSTICE | $5,163 |
| FAMILY PLANNING OF SOUTHCENTRAL NY | $5,000 |
| FAM PLANNING OF SOUTH CENTRA | $5,000 |
| FRIENDS OF BASSETT HC NETWOR | $5,000 |
| COOPERSTOWN SUMMER MUSIC FESTIVAL | $5,000 |
| AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARAT | $2,500 |
| AS YOU SOW | $2,000 |
| FENIMORE ART MUSEUM | $1,500 |
| GLIMMERGLASS FESTIVAL | $1,250 |
| COOPERSTOWN FOOD PANTRY | $1,062 |
| OTSEGO 2000 | $1,062 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
110 repeat relationships — 40 still active in FY2025, 70 since wound down; 29 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
EARTHJUSTICE8× · 2017–2025 · $238k · revenue +82%- FPFAMILY PLANNING OF SOUTH CENTRAL NEW YORK INC3× · 2022–2025 · $25k · revenue +13%
Save The Children Federation Inc7× · 2017–2024 · $18k · revenue +21%
Funded once
- CFCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF OTSEone grant, 2019 · $50k
- CFCOMM FOUND OF OTSEGO COUNTYone grant, 2020 · $30k
- CFCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF OTSEGO COone grant, 2023 · $30k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…
Cdp north america, inc. 's ("cdp-na") vision for the future is a thriving economy that works for people and planet in the long term. we focus investors and companies on taking urgent action to build a truly sustainable economy by measuring…
Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…
Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.
To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.
To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is As You Sow and the most unlike its peers is Angel Network of Cooperstown Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
113 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 113 of the 327 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PLANNING OF SOUTH CENTRAL NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE ↗
- Who funds SUSQUEHANNA SPCA INC ↗
- Who funds Friends of Bassett Inc ↗
- Who funds FENIMORE ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds OTSEGO 2000 INC ↗
- Who funds COOPERSTOWN FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds AS YOU SOW ↗
- Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
- Who funds PATHFINDER VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE GREATER CAPITAL REGION INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds OTSEGO LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds Intersection for the Arts ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Scriven Foundation · C J Heilig Foundation Inc · The Patricia M & H William Smith Jr Foundation · The Tianaderrah Foundation (NY) · The James and Stephanie Patrick Fam · The Nycm Foundation · Robert and Marjorie Alpern Foundation · Community Foundation of Otsego County Inc · Alice Busch Gronewaldt Foundation Inc · The Robert and Esther Black Family Foundation · The Community Foundation for South Central New York Inc · Willies Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Allstadt Hardin Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
- Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.