· Public charity
Alliance for Green Heat
The Alliance for Green Heat promotes modern wood and pellet heating systems as a low-carbon sustainable and affordable energy solution.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $31k
- $10k–50k34 grants · $959k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $150k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Wood4Good LTD | $50,000 |
| Shoshone Paiute Tribe | $50,000 |
| Little Woodbank | $50,000 |
| Chama Peak Land Alliance | $49,958 |
| Nez Perce Tribe | $49,900 |
| Oglala Sioux Tribe | $49,541 |
| Dine Baadeiti For the People | $46,675 |
| CommunityWorx | $45,993 |
| Hinton Rural Life Center | $45,758 |
| Crow Tribe | $45,436 |
| Kayenta Chapter | $42,111 |
| Full Circle Forestry Collective | $37,639 |
| Yee Ha olnii Doo | $35,326 |
| Nativity Woodbank | $33,699 |
| Warm Hearths Firewood Bank | $30,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $129k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
21 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 28 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $696k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- CPCHAMA PEAK LAND ALLIANCE2× · 2024–2025 · $65k · revenue +54%
- CCOMMUNITYWORX2× · 2024–2025 · $61k · revenue +26% · 38% of their budget
- WLWOOD4GOOD LTD2× · 2024–2025 · $60k · revenue +103%
Funded once
- CLConservation Legacyone grant, 2023 · $34k
- NLNATIVITY LUTHERAN CHURCHone grant, 2024 · $30k
- RORural Organizing and Resilienceone grant, 2024 · $29k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
providing firewood to heat homes for those who are in need
To restore enhance and maintain our native forest ecosystems
Womanshare Legacy is an educational, financial and cultural resource for women who may be facing challenges because of discrimination, lack of opportunities or scarcity of personal support. Womanshare Legacy works locally with women,…
The Northern Forest Center creates bold possibilities that give rise to vibrant Northern Forest communities and envisions a thriving and welcoming Northern Forest region sustained by innovation and environmental stewardship.
The mission of The Blackfoot Challenge is to coordinate efforts that will conserve and enhance the natural resources and rural way of life in the Blackfoot Watershed for present and future generations.
To bring together the resources of public and private resource organizations in the interests of wildfire prevention loss and mitigation.
To engage the community and facilitate efforts that will enhance, sustain, conserve and protect the natural resources and rural lifestyle of the Clearwater Watershed for present and future generations.
Vision: a healthy and resilient big thompson watershed benefitting fish, wildlife, and the people itserves through collaborative efforts for current and future generations. mission: working with others to take action that protects and…
EcoSource Native Seed & Restoration works with and for its members to provide business opportunities aimed at collecting, cleaning, producing, and storing genetically-appropriate native plant seeds. We also develop and implement the most…
The Boulder Watershed Collective is a 501c3 non-profit stakeholder-driven organization established to address forested watershed health,resiliency and stewardship. We have three program areas: ClimateAdaptation and Resilience Watershed…
How this is measured
35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 129 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHAMA PEAK LAND ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITYWORX ↗
- Who funds WOOD4GOOD LTD ↗
- Who funds YEE HAOLNII DOO ↗
- Who funds MAINE WOOD BANKS ↗
- Who funds Black Mesa Trust inc ↗
- Who funds BEAVERHEAD COMMUNITY WOOD BANK MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds UTAH NAVAJO HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds CHIP INC ↗
- Who funds Gold Country Community Services ↗
- Who funds ASHEVILLE TOOL LIBRARY ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: First Nations Development Institute · National Forest Foundation · Ndn Collective Inc · National Indian Health Board · The Nature Conservancy · New Mexico Community Foundation · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · The Hopi Foundation Lomasumi'Nangwtukwsiwmani · Grid Alternatives · The Wilderness Society · Maine Community Foundation Inc · AARP
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Alliance for Green Heat funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alliance for Green Heat. Bigger dots raise more.
- Integral Youth Services: 29% of income from government
- Greenagers Inc: 7% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Alliance for Green Heat?
Find your warmest path to Alliance for Green Heat through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Alliance for Green Heat’s filings →