How much did NATIONAL INDIAN HEALTH BOARD grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 73% of NATIONAL INDIAN HEALTH BOARD’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

americans alaskanalaskan natives

2019

—

2020

—

2021

—

2022

—

2023

—

2024

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k6 grants · $48k
$10k–50k14 grants · $365k
$50k–250k9 grants · $1.1M
$250k+1 grant · $350k

$30,000

Median grant

States reached

$8.8M

Total assets

Largest grants

TULE RIVER HEALTH CENTER INC$350,000
HO-CHUNK NATION 1$176,500
GREAT PLAINS TRIBAL LEADER'S HEALTH BOARD$175,000
SALT RIVER PIMA-MARICOPA$166,000
TURTLE MOUNTAIN BAND CHIPPEWA INDIANS$150,000
TUNICA-BILOXI TRIBE OF LOUISIANA$116,500
SONOMA COUNTY INDIAN HEALTH PROJECT$95,000
PONCA TRIBE OF NEBRASKA-1 (DELETED)$75,000
SUQUAMISH INDIAN TRIBE (1)$60,000
DOT LAKE VILLAGE$50,000
NORTON SOUND HEALTH CORPORATION$45,000
TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION$38,000
UNITED INDIAN HEALTH SERVICES INC$37,250
MATHEMATICA INC$34,430
IOWA TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA$30,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–20, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 90% of NATIONAL INDIAN HEALTH BOARD’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

NATIONAL INDIAN HEALTH BOARDlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$6.4M · 54 repeat orgs$2.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +61% since the first grant, against +60% for the ones you funded once.

54 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2024, 33 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$6.4M

$1.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%

+60%

Still filing today

26%

19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $411k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationSocial ScienceOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

AN
ALASKA NATIVE TRIBAL HEALTH CONSORTIUM
3× · 2020–2022 · $489k · revenue +68%
US
UNITED SOUTH AND EASTERN TRIBES INC
2× · 2017–2021 · $478k · revenue +33%
TR
TULE RIVER INDIAN HEALTH CENTER INC
2× · 2022–2024 · $365k · revenue +85%

Funded once

OL
ORANSI LLC
one grant, 2023 · $259k
AC
ALEN CORPORATION
one grant, 2023 · $177k
AI
AMERICAN INDIAN CANCER FOUNDgraduated
one grant, 2017 · $130k · revenue +37%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Southern Indian Health Council

Southern Indian Health Council is a Native American organization committed to protecting and improving the physical, mental, and spiritual health of our American Indian Community. We provide a comprehensive range of wellness, health care,…

Health

American Indian Health & Services

To promote and provide quality services to improve the health and well-being of American Indians/Alaska Natives and other community members.

Arts & Culture

National Indian Health Board

To advocate as the united voice of federally recognized american indian and alaska native tribes.

—

The Center for Native Health Inc

Integrate community-based traditional knowledge into all facets of Native health care and education and to promote wellness and balance for Indigenous peoples.

Education

Seattle Indian Health Board

Seattle indian health board is a community health center that provides health and human services to its patients, while specializing in the care of native people. we are recognized as a leader in the promotion of health improvement for…

Health

Indian Health Care Resource Center Inc

Provide quality, comprehensive health care to tulsa area indian people in a culturally sensitive manner that promotes good health, well being and harmony.

Health

Texas Native Health

To strengthen and encourage the health and well-being of native americans.

Human Services

Bering Omega Community Health Services

Bering omega community health services exists to nurture the well being and meet the physical emotional and spiritual needs of persons affected by hiv/aids through compassionate health care and social services.

Health

Indian Health Center of Santa Clara Valley

To help ensure the survival and healing of American Indians and Alaskan Natives and our community.

Health

Northern Valley Indian Health Inc

To provide health services to eligible american indians in the service areas of Colusa, Glenn, and Yolo counties and portions of Butte and Tehama counties. Medical and dental services are provided to the general community as well.

Health

Indigenous Peoples Council for

The Council is a coalition of Tribal marine mammal commissions/councils and other Native organizations formed for the purpose of identifying and addressing marine mammal issues of common concern.

Environment

Northern California Indian

Research, develop, and administer social and economic development programs to meet the needs of indian and native american communities.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Great Plains Tribal Leaders Health and the most unlike its peers is Aleutian Pribilof Islands. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

1%2/134

the rest of the field

11%

206,162/1,819,431

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

06the grantee network

32 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

29/32

Grantees still filing

28/32

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$6,211,782Health$2,189,078Social Science$49,000Education$48,700Human Services$36,000Community Improvement$15,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Nations Development InstituteCO115.9× affinity64 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Nations Development Institute · Wounded Warriors Family Support Inc · Indian Land Tenure Foundation · Association of Tribal Archives Libraries & Museums · Ndn Collective Inc · The Notah Begay III Foundation · National Congress of American Indians · Delta Dental of Washington · Inatai Foundation · Great Plains Tribal Leaders Health · National Foundation for the Centers For · Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation NATIONAL INDIAN HEALTH BOARD funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

2rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: UNITED SOUTH AND EASTERN TRIBES INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~6 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 591315904 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on UNITED SOUTH AND EASTERN TRIBES INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 6 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 3% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to National Indian Health Board?

Find your warmest path to National Indian Health Board through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

NATIONAL INDIAN HEALTH BOARD

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

32 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to National Indian Health Board?

More from the funding graph

NATIONAL INDIAN HEALTH BOARD

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

32 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to National Indian Health Board?

More from the funding graph