· Public charity
The Hopi Foundation Lomasumi'Nangwtukwsiwmani
To maintain, preserve, revitalize, and generate activities in hopi and indigenous cultures both for the benefit of the members of those cultures and for the benefit of all humankind, including the dominant surrounding cultures.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 56% of THE HOPI FOUNDATION LOMASUMI'NANGWTUKWSIWMANI’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $190,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $236,590 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $46,590 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k8 grants · $80k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $110k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SHUNGOPAVI VILLAGE | $60,000 |
| ORAVYI VILLAGE | $50,000 |
| CONSERVATION LEGACY | $10,000 |
| SEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLE INC | $10,000 |
| SICHOMOVI VILLAGE | $10,000 |
| VILLAGE OF WALPI | $10,000 |
| VILLAGE OF TEWA | $10,000 |
| SIPAULOVI VILLAGE | $10,000 |
| KYKOTSMOVI VILLAGE | $10,000 |
| BLACK MESA TRUST | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $118k) land where the poverty rate runs at 24%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +105% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OPOWL & PANTHER4× · 2018–2022 · $213k · revenue +669% · 28% of their budget
CONSERVATION LEGACY5× · 2019–2024 · $99k · revenue +105%- BMBlack Mesa Trust inc3× · 2022–2024 · $27k · revenue +46%
Funded once
- RFRED FEATHER DEVELOPMENT GROUPgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +48%
- NNNORTHWEST NEW MEXICO FIRST BORN PROGRAMone grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue +3%
- FMFIRST MESA YOUTH CENTERone grant, 2020 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The american indian institute's mission is to perpetuate the ancient wisdom and cultural heritage of north america's native people and to promote a greater understanding of that wisdom amoung all people.
He Sapa Otipi restores hope, healing, and sovereignty by reclaiming Indigenous lifeways and uplifting the mind, body, and spirit of our people through cultural strength and community care.
The Cihuapactli Collective's purpose is to provide healing for urban Indigenous Peoples from the diaspora. This is done by sharing wisdom, connecting resources, revitalizing Traditional Knowledge, promoting and advocating for health &…
Fund Indigenous Nations Languate, Culture and Restoration Plans
The organization has been formed to educate the public about indigenous people from the amazon regions through various cultural activities. the organization will also facilitate collaborations between indigenous amazonians and contemporary…
For the benefit and inspiration of ALL, Na Hoa Aloha o ka Pu'uhonua o Honaunau participates with NPS and other partners to protect and preserve cultural and natural resources, guided by the aacestral knowledge of South Kona.
To restore the unceded ancestral homelands of the FTBMI by implementing protective land management strategies, traditional ecological knowledge, and climate-resilient initiatives. By holding lands in perpetuity, TLC works to prevent the…
Hopa Mountain invests in rural and tribal citizen leaders, adults and youth who areimproving education, ecological health, and economic development. Hopa Mountainprovides these leaders with training, mentoring, network opportunities,…
Honor the earth is committed to protecting the lifeways and sovereignty of our indigenous relatives across mother earth. we do this by investing in our communities and a new generation of organizers through campaigns, research, training,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Hopi Foundation Lomasumi'nangwtukwsiwmani and the most unlike its peers is Moenkopi Senior Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OWL & PANTHER ↗
- Who funds CONSERVATION LEGACY ↗
- Who funds RED FEATHER DEVELOPMENT GROUP ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST NEW MEXICO FIRST BORN PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds Black Mesa Trust inc ↗
- Who funds MOENKOPI SENIOR CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HOPI TUTSKWA PERMACULTURE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds SEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INC ↗
- Who funds HOPI-TEWA WOMENS COALITION TO END ABUSE ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOPI CREDIT ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds STEWARDSHIP UTAH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE HOPI FOUNDATION LOMASUMI'NANGWTUKWSIWMANI ↗
- Who funds Hopi Relief ↗
- Who funds HOPIVEWAT INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: St Mary's Food Bank Alliance · Arizona Community Foundation · First Nations Development Institute · Alliance for Green Heat · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Hopi Foundation Lomasumi'Nangwtukwsiwmani funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Hopi Foundation Lomasumi'Nangwtukwsiwmani?
Find your warmest path to The Hopi Foundation Lomasumi'Nangwtukwsiwmani through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.