· Public charity
Alliance for California Traditional Arts
ACTA's mission is to ensure that California's future holds California's past.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 48 grants below total $675,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,117,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,442,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k47 grants · $625k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Backyard 4 Life LLC | $50,000 |
| Agua Sol y Sereno INC | $25,000 |
| Dancers Group | $25,000 |
| Cambodian American Resource A | $25,000 |
| Another Level Training Academ | $12,500 |
| Manilatown Heritage Foundatio | $12,500 |
| Purple Silk Music Education | $12,500 |
| Oakland Public Conservatory | $12,500 |
| Generaciones en Accion | $12,500 |
| El Teatro de la Tierra | $12,500 |
| Center for Training & Careers | $12,500 |
| Association for the Advanceme | $12,500 |
| CubaCaribe | $12,500 |
| The East LA Society of Film | $12,500 |
| Fund for Resource Conservatio | $12,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +102% since the first grant, against +48% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 44 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 7% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $625k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SOSCHOOL OF ARTS AND CULTURE AT MHP2× · 2018–2024 · $23k · revenue +107%
- DCDiamano Coura West African Dance Co2× · 2017–2024 · $23k · revenue +346%
- DDDIMENSIONS DANCE THEATER INCORPORATED2× · 2018–2019 · $20k · revenue +7%
Funded once
- WFWalter & Flora Hewlett Foundone grant, 2020 · $103k
- WAWALTER AND ELISE HAAS FUNDone grant, 2020 · $53k · revenue -37%
- SFSURDNA FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +16%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Indian Dance Training Center (IDTC) is a community development organizationaimed at empowering the youth through cultural dance training of traditional SouthAsian dance styles as well as classical theater. IDTC provides trainings,…
Carnaval San Francisco cultivates and celebrates the diverse Latin American, Caribbean, and African roots of the Mission District and the San Francisco Bay Area. We accomplish our mission through dance, music, the visual arts.
Unite all latino americans
Culture advance and literature
Dance, theater and music
Casa de la Cultura was created as an entity that would support and foster the growth and promotion of LatinoHispanic arts in our region Casa de la Cultura is dedicated to creating space where Hispanic artists can grow showcase and promote…
Danza Floricanto/USA - founded in 1975 by Gema Sandoval. Danza Floricanto/USA is the oldest existing professional Mexican folk dance troupe in Los Angeles. As professional dancers, their purpose is to preserve Mexican culture, validate it…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is School of Arts and Culture At Mhp and the most unlike its peers is Walter and Elise Haas Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 16 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 12% of your grantees by number, and just 12% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WALTER AND ELISE HAAS FUND ↗
- Who funds SURDNA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds EL TEATRO DE LA TIERRA ↗
- Who funds KINGS REGIONAL TRADITIONAL FOLK ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds DANCERS GROUP ↗
- Who funds AGUA SOL Y SERENO INC ↗
- Who funds SCHOOL OF ARTS AND CULTURE AT MHP ↗
- Who funds Diamano Coura West African Dance Co ↗
- Who funds DANZANTES UNIDOS DE CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds DIMENSIONS DANCE THEATER INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds MERCED LAO FAMILY COMMUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds Culturas Music & Arts ↗
- Who funds SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY CONCERT ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Na Lei Hulu I Ka Wekiu Hula Halau ↗
- Who funds Somos Familia ↗
- Who funds ANOTHER LEVEL TRAINING ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF FILIPINO AMERICAN ↗
- Who funds THE MAHEA UCHIYAMA CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL DANCE ↗
- Who funds La Pea Cultural Center Inc ↗
- Who funds KULTIVATE LABS ↗
- Who funds Manilatown Heritage Foundation ↗
- Who funds MARIGOLD PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF BLACK LATINOS ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR TRAINING & CAREERS INC ↗
- Who funds EAST LA SOCIETY OF FILM & ARTS ↗
- Who funds CHAVALOS DE AQUI Y ALLA ↗
- Who funds CUBACARIBE ↗
- Who funds HMONG YOUTH AND PARENTS UNITED ↗
- Who funds Kumeyaay Community College Inc ↗
- Who funds CHAKSAM-PA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Zellerbach Family Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation · Latino Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Kenneth Rainin Foundation · The California Endowment · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Center for Cultural Innovation · California Humanities · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Public Health Institute · Gerbode Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Alliance for California Traditional Arts funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Alliance for California Traditional Arts?
Find your warmest path to Alliance for California Traditional Arts through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.