· Private foundation
All in Leaders Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MCCALLIE SCHOOL | $7,161 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 33% of All in Leaders Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 63% of the giving stays in FL; read by stated purpose it is 51% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EMENDEAVOR MIAMI INC2× · 2018–2020 · $17k · revenue +68%
- TMTHE MCCALLIE SCHOOL3× · 2017–2024 · $11k · revenue +2%
- APACTORS' PLAYHOUSE PRODUCTIONS INC2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +21%
Funded once
- HIHALFTIME INSTITUTEone grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue -14%
- FOFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETESgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue +80%
- TATHE ATLANTA RESOURCE FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue +123%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Accrediting independent schools.
Innovation charter school empowers young ones for success as world changers through highly talented teachers using innovative and leading methods in a very loving environment.
Habitat for humanity of greater miami (hfhgm) is a christian ministry whose purpose is to build homes and communities in partnership with low-income families within greater miami.
Central Miami Christian Academy exists to teach and train students for successful living in their home, church, workplace, city and world.
The mission of heartland christian academy (of heartland christian school, inc.) is to provide a university-ready education in a safe and wholesome environment, grounded in the christian faith.
Cooperative baptist fellowship supports its mission with the following eight goals: 1. start new churches 2. strengthen existing churches 3. broaden and strengthen the financial base and support of cbf florida 4. grow cbf florida…
CVA is dedicated to the education of students in grades K-12th grade. Our goal is to equip students with Gods word and strong academics in order to impact the world for Christ.
The institute for child and family health is committed to empowering the children, youth and families of miami-dade county, florida by providing services that enhance their emotional, physical and educational well-being.
Downtown miami charter school, inc. is nonprofit corporation and a component unit of the public school board of miami-dade county, florida. the school is a public charter school which serves students from kindergarten to sixth grade in…
The mission of communities in schools is to surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life.
The school's mission is to provide chilren of the community with an outstanding jewish and secular education that will equip the students with the tools neccessary to pursue studies in any higher educational institution. students are in a…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Touching Miami With Love Ministries Inc and the most unlike its peers is Actors' Playhouse Productions Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HALFTIME INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds ENDEAVOR MIAMI INC ↗
- Who funds THE MCCALLIE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
- Who funds CORAL GABLES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE ATLANTA RESOURCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE CLEO INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds ACTORS' PLAYHOUSE PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds SERVLIFE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds CARE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds TOUCHING MIAMI WITH LOVE MINISTRIES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Kirk Foundation · The Miami Foundation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization All in Leaders Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Care Elementary School Inc — 8% of income from government
- Covenant House Florida Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to All in Leaders Inc?
Find your warmest path to All in Leaders Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.