Skip to content

· Private foundation

Alice Gist Dunaway Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$220k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$273kFood & Nutrition$190kHuman Services$133kAnimals$60kPublic Safety & Disaster$31kEnvironment$30kHousing & Shelter$28kCrime & Legal$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $197k
$12,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$351k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RISE RESOURCE CONSORTIUM$30,000
REDEEMER CHURCH$18,000
MEALS ON WHEELS AMARILLO$17,000
HIGH PLAINS FOOD BANK$15,000
HOUSTON FOOD BANK$15,000
HOPE HEALS$15,000
CASA OF THE SOUTH PLAINS$15,000
MEALS ON WHEELS LUBBOCK$15,000
SNACK PAC 4 KIDS$15,000
LAUNCH GLOBAL$12,000
EVELINE'S SUNSHINE COTTAGE$10,000
DOWNTOWN WOMENS CENTER$10,000
LOVE LUBBOCK TRINITY CHURCH$10,000
TEXAR$8,000
CRU$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $92k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOUSTON AREA WOMENS CENTER: $10k → 16%FAITH CITY MISSION: $1k → 20%HOPE HEALS: $15k → 13%FLYING HORSE FOUNDATION: $15k → 3%HOUSTON AREA WOMENS CENTER: $5k → 16%MEALS ON WHEELS: $10k → 20%FAITH CITY MISSION: $8k → 20%MEALS ON WHEELS: $3k → 20%FAITH CITY MISSION: $1k → 20%FAITH CITY MISSION: $1k → 20%MEALS ON WHEELS: $1k → 20%MEALS ON WHEELS: $10k → 20%TESSA: $10k → 9%MEALS ON WHEELS: $3k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$541k · 23 repeat orgs$259k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
15

Total granted

$541k
$122k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+17%

Still filing today

35%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $138k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
Human ServicesReligionPublic Safety & DisasterAnimalsHealthHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LG
    LAUNCH GLOBAL
    5× · 2019–2025 · $69k · revenue +24%
  • The Houston Food Bank
    3× · 2019–2025 · $61k · revenue +109%
  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS
    5× · 2017–2022 · $27k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • TA
    THE AUSTIN STONE COMMUNITY CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $38k
  • TF
    The Flying Horse Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +430%
  • T
    TESSA
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +17%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Housing Network of Fort Collins Inc

Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…

Human Services
2
Crisis Center of West Texas

Crisis center of west texas' mission is to respond, shelter, and educate to end domestic and sexual violence in west texas.

—
3
Shelter Agencies for Families in East Texas

To provide shelter to abused families.

Human Services
4
Safehouse Denver Inc

Safehouse denver assists adult, children, and youth in reclaiming their right to a life free from domestic violence. the agency provides a broad spectrum of culturally competent, trauma-informed services, including but not limited to,…

Human Services
5
The Humane Society of Austin & Travis County Inc

The austin humane society (ahs) offers comprehensive, humane, life-saving animal services, transforming the lives of animals and those who love them. because we believe homeless animals deserve a chance to thrive in a loving environment,…

Animals
6
Casa de Esperanza

Casa is a refuge, providing protection and education for people caught in the cylces of domestic violence, sexual assault and child assault. Casa is a healing community where women and children can receive the nurturing and support…

Human Services
7
Safe Nesttemporary Assistance for

Safe nest's mission is to provide comprehensive, collaborative, and innovative services for everyone affected by domestic and sexual violence while passionatley working to end this shared epidemic.

Human Services
8
Atx Helps

ATX Helps was created to fill gaps in the spectrum of services available to people in Austin who are experiencing homelessness.

Human Services
9
Noah's Animal House Foundation

To remove the "no pets allowed" sign on the doors of domestic violence shelters. women should not have to choose between leaving their abuser and leaving their pets behind to be abused.

Animals
10
Hope's Door New Beginning Center

The mission of hope's door new beginning center is to offer intervention and prevention services to individuals and families affected by intimate partner and family violence and to provide education programs that enhance the community's…

Human Services
11
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
12
Covenant House Texas

Covenant house texas shelters, protects, and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, and sexually exploited youth.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa of the South Plains Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Flying Horse Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Houston Food Bank: $61,000 · OtherThe Houston Food BankFELLOWSHIP BIBLE CHURCH: $47,500 · OtherFELLOWSHIP BIBLE CHURCHCOWBOY JUNCTION CHURCH: $39,500 · OtherCOWBOY JUNCTION CHURCHTHE AUSTIN STONE COMMUNITY CHURCH: $38,000 · OtherTHE AUSTIN STONE COMMUNITY CHURCHAUSTIN STONE COMMUNITY CH: $37,700 · OtherAUSTIN STONE COMMUNITY CHRISE RESOURCE CONSORTIUM: $30,000 · OtherRISE RESOURCE CONSORTIUMCHEYENNE MOUNTAIN ZOO: $30,000 · OtherCHEYENNE MOUNTAIN ZOOMEALS ON WHEELS AMARILLO: $22,000 · OtherFRIENDS 4 LIFE: $20,000 · OtherREDEEMER CHURCH: $18,000 · Other+25 more: $188,720 · Other+25 moreMEALS ON WHEELS: $26,500 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHEEL…Houston Area Women's Center: $15,000 · Human ServicesHouston Area W…Hope Heals Inc: $15,000 · Human ServicesHope Heals IncThe Flying Horse Foundation: $15,000 · Human ServicesThe Flying Hor…FAITH CITY INC: $10,700 · Human ServicesFAITH CITY INCTESSA: $10,000 · Human ServicesTESSAEVELINE'S SUNSHINE COTTAGE: $10,000 · Human ServicesEVELINE'S SUNS…LAUNCH GLOBAL: $69,000 · ReligionLAUNCH GLOBALTEAM KIWI INC: $30,000 · ReligionTEAM KIWI INCAUSTIN DISASTER RELIEF NETWORK: $23,000 · Public Safety & DisasterTEXSAR INC: $8,000 · Public Safety & DisasterCASA OF THE SOUTH PLAINS INC: $15,000 · Crime & LegalHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION: $10,000 · AnimalsHOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $5,000 · AnimalsNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $5,000 · Health
Other$532,420Human Services$102,200Religion$99,000Public Safety & Disaster$31,000Crime & Legal$15,000Animals$15,000Health$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLAUNCH GLOBAL: $69,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $61,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM KIWI INC: $30,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS: $26,500 over 5y, 8.2% of budgetAUSTIN DISASTER RELIEF NETWORK: $23,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $16,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHouston Area Women's Center: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFAITH CITY INC: $10,700 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTESSA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetALPINE AUTISM CENTER: $10,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASA of the Pikes Peak Region: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARTHA'S HOME INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LAUNCH GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds TEAM KIWI INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN DISASTER RELIEF NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Houston Area Women's Center ↗
  • Who funds Hope Heals Inc ↗
  • Who funds HIGH PLAINS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds The Flying Horse Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF THE SOUTH PLAINS INC ↗
  • Who funds FAITH CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds TESSA ↗
  • Who funds ALPINE AUTISM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds EVELINE'S SUNSHINE COTTAGE ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION ↗
  • Who funds TEXSAR INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Xcel Energy FoundationMN17.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Xcel Energy Foundation · William & Louise Mullins Foundation · Merrick Foundation · Amarillo Business Foundation · The United Way Inc · Mays Foundation · Dr Kent Roberts & Ilene Roberts Balliett Foundation · The Ware Foundation · Josephine Anderson Charitable Trust · High Plains Christian Ministries Foundation · Mary E Bivins Foundation · Pikes Peak Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alice Gist Dunaway Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alice Gist Dunaway Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alice Gist Dunaway’s filings →

    More from the funding graph