Skip to content

· Public charity

Alianza Americas

The mission of Alianza Americas is to bring about a more inclusive, equitable and sustainable way of life for Latino immigrant communities living in the United States and across the americas.

$54k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

International$1.3MHealth$1.3MHuman Services$858kCommunity Improvement$721kPhilanthropy$672kEmployment$50kCivil Rights$29kPublic Safety & Disaster$5k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $12,863, the rows itemized in this filing. The $53,868 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $41,005 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$7,509
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Alabama AIDS$7,509
Red De Pueblos$5,354
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 38% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Central American Resource Center: $186k → 14%Arakansas United: $45k → 14%Arkansas United: $30k → 17%LILA Latinx: $432k → 11%Telpochcalli Community Education Project: $200k → 14%Wind of the Spirit: $173k → 4%Lila Latinx: $40k → 11%Illinois Workers in Action: $50k → 8%National Partnership for New Americans: $10k → 14%Wind of the Spirit: $140k → 4%Red De Pueblos Transnacionales: $32k → 28%Red De Pueblos: $9k → 28%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
NJ
CA
MD
AR
NC
DC
LA
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.5M · 16 repeat orgs$367k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
8

Total granted

$4.5M
$362k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+52%

Still filing today

88%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthCivil RightsInternationalCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $1.1M · revenue +38%
  • CC
    CIELO COMMUNITY FOR INNOVATION ENTREPRENEURSHIP LEADERSHIP
    2× · 2021–2022 · $721k · revenue +184%
  • CN
    Charity Navigator
    2× · 2021–2022 · $672k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • CA
    Central American Resource Center - CARECEN - of Californiagraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $186k · revenue +100%
  • IW
    ILLINIOS WORKERS IN ACTIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +250% · 42% of their budget
  • AG
    Asociacion Guatemaltecos Sin Fronteras Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $48k · 64% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Latin American Coalition

The Coalition is dedicated to educating Latino immigrant newcomers, celebrating hispanic culture, and advocating for underserved segments of the population. Programs and initiatives include economic development, legal counsel, community…

Human Services
2
Latino Union of Chicago

Latino Union works to defend the rights and dignity of contingent workers, including the right to immigrate, work, live free of oppression and violence, and provide for oneself and one's family.

Human Services
3
Immigrant Connection

Ensuring greater access to high-quality low-cost immigration legal services across the United States through local immigrant connection sites across the country. Our sites based in both rural and urban areas are established in…

Human Services
4
Centro Binacional Para El Desarrollo Indigena Oaxaqueno

Building Indigenous power through collective action to achieve economic, social and cultural development.

International
5
Immigrants Rising

We empower people to achieve their educational and career goals through personal, institutional and policy transformation.

Human Services
6
Virginia Coalition for Immigrant Rights

VACIR is a multi-racial and multi-ethnic coalition of organizations that exists to win dignity, power and quality of life for all immigrant and refugee communities.

Human Services
7
La Comunidad Inc

Legal, immigration and community organizing

—
8
Detention Watch Network

Detention Watch Network seeks to end the cruel system of immigration detention via programs of grassroots organizing, strategic communications, and collective advocacy.

Human Services
9
Colectiva Legal Del Pueblo

Colectiva Legal del Pueblo is a non-hierarchal collective organization founded for and by undocumented immigrants working to build community leadership and power for migrant justice through legal services, advocacy and education.

Civil Rights
10
Immigration Coalition Corporation

The immigration coalition provides clean drinking water, food, and much needed items to immigrant, migrant, and asylum-seeking communities along the southern border.

Civil Rights
11
Capi Usa

CAPI USA's mission is to guide refugees and immigrants in the journey toward self-determination and social equality.

International
12
Coalition of Irish Immigration Centers Inc C/O Celine Kennelly

Ciic provides service to the irish/irish american community across the us in partnership with its direct service member centers, thus impacting constituents. ciic provides a national perspective of issues facing irish immigrants, while…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Immigrant Progress; the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
13/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Charity Navigator: $671,717 · Human ServicesCharity NavigatorWIND OF THE SPIRIT IMMIGRANT RESOURCE CENTER INC: $312,537 · Human ServicesWIND OF THE SPIRIT IMMIGRANT RE…Central American Resource Center - CARECEN - of California: $186,470 · Human ServicesCentral American Resource Cente…Arkansas United: $74,553 · Human ServicesArkansas UnitedILLINIOS WORKERS IN ACTION: $49,978 · Human Services+2 more: $50,544 · Human ServicesInternational Rescue Committee INC: $1,068,371 · InternationalInternational Rescue Commit…Alianza Americas: $133,951 · InternationalAlianza AmericasLATINO COMMISSION ON AIDS: $411,630 · HealthLATINO COMMISSION ON AI…Rural Womens Health Project Inc: $294,092 · HealthRural Womens Health Pro…HONDURANS AGAINST AIDS INC CO MIRTHA COLON: $277,601 · HealthHONDURANS AGAINST AIDS …AIDS ALABAMA INC: $44,887 · HealthCIELO COMMUNITY FOR INNOVATION ENTREPRENEURSHIP LEADERSHIP: $720,834 · Community ImprovementCIELO COMMUNITY …CENTRO SAN BONIFACIO INC: $90,511 · OtherWOMEN WORKING TOGETHER 2 WORSHIP ORGANIZATION: $75,787 · OtherFAMILIAS UNIDAS INC: $70,777 · OtherAsociacion Guatemaltecos Sin Fronteras Inc: $47,650 · OtherCentral American Resource Center: $46,392 · Other+3 more: $21,783 · OtherCOPAL-EDUCATION FUND COMMUNIDADES ORGANIZANDO EL PODER Y LA A: $238,509 · Civil RightsWECOUNT: $19,461 · Civil Rights+1 more: $5,163 · Civil Rights
Human Services$1,345,799International$1,202,322Health$1,028,210Community Improvement$720,834Other$352,900Civil Rights$263,133

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $1,068,371 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCIELO COMMUNITY FOR INNOVATION ENTREPRENEURSHIP LEADERSHIP: $720,834 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetCharity Navigator: $671,717 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetLATINO COMMISSION ON AIDS: $411,630 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetWIND OF THE SPIRIT IMMIGRANT RESOURCE CENTER INC: $312,537 over 2y, 15% of budgetRural Womens Health Project Inc: $294,092 over 2y, 52% of budgetHONDURANS AGAINST AIDS INC CO MIRTHA COLON: $277,601 over 2y, 33% of budgetCOPAL-EDUCATION FUND COMMUNIDADES ORGANIZANDO EL PODER Y LA A: $238,509 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetCentral American Resource Center - CARECEN - of California: $186,470 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetAlianza Americas: $133,951 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetCENTRO SAN BONIFACIO INC: $90,511 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetArkansas United: $74,553 over 2y, 8.9% of budgetILLINIOS WORKERS IN ACTION: $49,978 over 1y, 42% of budgetAsociacion Guatemaltecos Sin Fronteras Inc: $47,650 over 1y, 64% of budgetAIDS ALABAMA INC: $44,887 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWECOUNT: $19,461 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR NEW AMERICANS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFlorida Immigrant Coalition Inc: $5,163 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Immigration Law CenterDC17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Immigration Law Center · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Phalarope Foundation Co Rebecca H Dent · Casa Inc · National Day Laborer Organizing Network · Hispanics in Philanthropy · United States Energy Foundation · New Venture Fund · The Ford Foundation · Tides Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alianza Americas funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alianza Americas. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Alianza Americas?

    Find your warmest path to Alianza Americas through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alianza Americas’ filings →

    More from the funding graph