· Public charity
Alianza Americas
The mission of Alianza Americas is to bring about a more inclusive, equitable and sustainable way of life for Latino immigrant communities living in the United States and across the americas.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 2 grants below total $12,863 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $53,868 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $41,005 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Alabama AIDS | $7,509 |
| Red De Pueblos | $5,354 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 38% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
16 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IRInternational Rescue Committee INC3× · 2021–2023 · $1.1M · revenue +38%
- CCCIELO COMMUNITY FOR INNOVATION ENTREPRENEURSHIP LEADERSHIP2× · 2021–2022 · $721k · revenue +184%
- CNCharity Navigator2× · 2021–2022 · $672k · revenue +30%
Funded once
- CACentral American Resource Center - CARECEN - of Californiagraduatedone grant, 2021 · $186k · revenue +100%
- IWILLINIOS WORKERS IN ACTIONgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +250% · 42% of their budget
- AGAsociacion Guatemaltecos Sin Fronteras Incone grant, 2023 · $48k · 64% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Coalition is dedicated to educating Latino immigrant newcomers, celebrating hispanic culture, and advocating for underserved segments of the population. Programs and initiatives include economic development, legal counsel, community…
Latino Union works to defend the rights and dignity of contingent workers, including the right to immigrate, work, live free of oppression and violence, and provide for oneself and one's family.
Ensuring greater access to high-quality low-cost immigration legal services across the United States through local immigrant connection sites across the country. Our sites based in both rural and urban areas are established in…
Building Indigenous power through collective action to achieve economic, social and cultural development.
We empower people to achieve their educational and career goals through personal, institutional and policy transformation.
VACIR is a multi-racial and multi-ethnic coalition of organizations that exists to win dignity, power and quality of life for all immigrant and refugee communities.
Legal, immigration and community organizing
Detention Watch Network seeks to end the cruel system of immigration detention via programs of grassroots organizing, strategic communications, and collective advocacy.
Colectiva Legal del Pueblo is a non-hierarchal collective organization founded for and by undocumented immigrants working to build community leadership and power for migrant justice through legal services, advocacy and education.
The immigration coalition provides clean drinking water, food, and much needed items to immigrant, migrant, and asylum-seeking communities along the southern border.
CAPI USA's mission is to guide refugees and immigrants in the journey toward self-determination and social equality.
Ciic provides service to the irish/irish american community across the us in partnership with its direct service member centers, thus impacting constituents. ciic provides a national perspective of issues facing irish immigrants, while…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Immigrant Progress and the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 15 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds CIELO COMMUNITY FOR INNOVATION ENTREPRENEURSHIP LEADERSHIP ↗
- Who funds Charity Navigator ↗
- Who funds LATINO COMMISSION ON AIDS ↗
- Who funds WIND OF THE SPIRIT IMMIGRANT RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Rural Womens Health Project Inc ↗
- Who funds HONDURANS AGAINST AIDS INC CO MIRTHA COLON ↗
- Who funds COPAL-EDUCATION FUND COMMUNIDADES ORGANIZANDO EL PODER Y LA A ↗
- Who funds Central American Resource Center - CARECEN - of California ↗
- Who funds Alianza Americas ↗
- Who funds CENTRO SAN BONIFACIO INC ↗
- Who funds Arkansas United ↗
- Who funds ILLINIOS WORKERS IN ACTION ↗
- Who funds Asociacion Guatemaltecos Sin Fronteras Inc ↗
- Who funds AIDS ALABAMA INC ↗
- Who funds TRANSNATIONAL VILLAGES NETWORK REDDE PUEBLOS TRASNACIONALES ↗
- Who funds WECOUNT ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR NEW AMERICANS ↗
- Who funds Center for Immigrant Progress ↗
- Who funds Florida Immigrant Coalition Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: National Immigration Law Center · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Phalarope Foundation Co Rebecca H Dent · Casa Inc · National Day Laborer Organizing Network · Hispanics in Philanthropy · United States Energy Foundation · New Venture Fund · The Ford Foundation · Tides Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Alianza Americas funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Alianza Americas?
Find your warmest path to Alianza Americas through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.